Mind Virus – The Aftermath of the Alien Love Bite – Soul Types and Predators – Audio and Text

Spread the love


by Eve Lorgen
August 29, 2016
EveLorgen Website

Spanish version

Many of my clients and correspondences are from people who experienced some form of anomalous trauma, especially “hyperdimensional interference” issues and especially Dark Side of Cupid love bite” relationships.

Many are disillusioned from the reality that these kinds of things even exist, where interference on levels “unseen” can predate upon our life force in a way that can either cause the person to “wake up”, or fall into unimaginable grief, confusion, embittered disillusionment or worse.

In fact, I often refer to a “love bite” experience as a kind of spiritual initiation, where you are thrown in a surreal, emotionally intense love connection, where a characteristic drama unfolds, causing such obsessive love, ecstatic highs, crashing lows and a deep psychic soul connection, that you believe you have met your soul mate or twin flame.

Soul Loss and Waking up from the Illusion

The flip side of the ecstatic highs and blissed out soul connection is deep emotionally wounded rejection, energy loss and incomprehensible grief so deep that it can throw one into a delirium of madness, or even sustained soul loss.

And in some cases, a kind of partial possession or entity infection can take place, if the Dark Side of Cupid love bite partner was “hosted” by a malevolent inter dimensional entity, who fed off of your energy for an extended period of time – or if you literally gave up to this predation, not understanding the consequences.

The more severe kinds of after effects have been reported, when, for example, the love bite partner was in actuality a practicing black magician, sorcerer or “reptilian host”.

When this occurs, I believe the love connection was intentioned as a strategic orchestration by the “vampiric attached entity” or sorcerer themselves because they seek to feed off of your energy.

This can give them power, expanded psychic abilities and awareness, and a great sexual partner/lover who will most likely fall in love with the hosted energy vampire.

The sad part about this, is that when such a cunning predator manages to link into deep levels of your being, such as the chakras, they can catalyze blissful energy sensations, elicit a profound love obsession, heart chakra expansion or even spontaneous kundalini activation.

When ones energy centers are blown open this way, there can be positive side effects, such as kundalini rising, blissful energy in various parts of the body.

One may experience expanded psychic awareness, love and other emotions. The sex drive can go through the roof. There can also be unpleasant emotional liability and a triggering of all ones inner psychological wounds all at the same time.

And when ones energy centers are exuding all this bliss kundalini energy it can also attract other beings in your life.

It’s actually quite amazing what people have reported to me about how magical things happen once their energy centers are open with more energy flowing and especially love. They may find themselves suddenly being noticed “by the opposite sex” when they had not really been noticed before.

They may have animals react to them differently, such as coming close to them for longer periods of time, instead of flying or running away. Things they think about may manifest more quickly, while experiencing telepathy or spontaneous remote viewing ability.

They may also start to notice feeling more exhausted, while at the same time feeling almost drugged with a kind of energy bliss, where the desire to meld and have sex with the partner is nearly constant.

It is akin to a powerful love spell – and perhaps that is exactly what it is.

As the relationship progresses, and depending on the degree of energy vampirism, emotional drama and narcissistic abuse factors, the soul energy loss and emotional wounding increases.

It may get to the point where a break up has to occur or ill health or possible death can result from this kind of soul loss and extreme emotional damage.

It is usually in the aftermath of such a relationship that a client will contact me, seeking healing and some explanation for how and why this can happen.

Many hold on to the hope that they will reconnect with their partner, believing that their unconditional love can change or “heal” the partner who is either narcissistically wounded or carries within them an attached entity, or both.

The desire to hold on to the illusion of the “soul mate/twin flame” partner is very strong in such situations, even despite abusive behaviors and consuming ill health. It is like an addiction that we grasp onto because having a connection like this is unlike any other.

Barbara Bartholic, my early mentor in my alien abduction research days, used to call this the “love drug” effect.

The drama of the love obsession seems to be proportional to the degree of how ones energy centers were melded and opened up, creating lots of bliss as if we were one soul. Our level of earlier emotional childhood wounding can also exacerbate the vulnerability we have for getting into such a love bite.

If we never really knew “true love” we often fall for the counterfeit and not perceive that it’s orchestrated.

Karmic Connections

We may even have spontaneous past life memories surface, when we meet or connect more deeply to our “love bite” partner. (Of course this can happen in non-love bite connections too.)

In fact, a very aware friend of mine had ET beings communicate to her during an abduction event, that one of the reasons they orchestrate such “love connections” is because the energy produced is a delicacy to them.

And for one of these catalyzed love relationships to work, they often need to have former “karmic connections” between the targeted partners.

These past life connections will often manifest as fine energy tendrils that will link up and in-between the people involved. So that the more karmic connections, the stronger or more effective a “love bite” will be.

It is not necessarily so, however, sometimes even when all the conditions for the orchestrated set up are present, some individuals just don’t “bite back” or generate strong feelings that result in a love connection.

A Strange Side Effect – Continued Energy Vampire Predations and Interdimensional Handling

One of the unfortunate things that can happen with someone who had an initial Dark Side of Cupid relationship, is that from that point forward in their life, even after they have broken up with that person, is that other “predator energy vampire” types will continue coming to them.

It is as if some magnetic “switch” has been flipped, or a kind of virus, that enables them to be found by other energy vampire types of people.

It makes one wonder if such “hosted” energy predators belong to a sort of hive mind egregore such that they can find these “prized” spiritual energy people by some kind of invisible network.

This is an observation with the more “high frequency” people who have innate spiritual gifts and a kind of high quality spiritual energy.

I will have to add also, that this is not the only explanation, because for those people who have not taken responsibility to do their own healing and recovery process for early life emotional wounding, they may fall into patterns of running into the same kinds of dysfunctional relationships.

In general, if the person does significant healing regarding their early life traumas and any relationship issues related to the first “love bite”, they can go on to establish good, healthy relationships in their lives afterwards.

One MILAB woman I knew who had the gift of clairvoyant vision, could “see” the different types of people and what they “hosted”.

Of course one of the reasons she was used as a “MILAB asset” was because she could telepathically link in with people, sometimes several at a time. She also could remote view situations when directed to do so, among other things.

Well, it just so happened that we sometimes attended UFO conferences together, and she could tell which persons to “be on the alert for” because they were hosting a reptilian being or perhaps other types of entities. She even knew that there were several types of reptilians, such as “yellow bellies”, who were the ones that were less “mean” but annoying and always the types of people vying for lots of attention.

She believed that many humans were actually reptilian hybrids in bodies, and many seemed to act in ways that appeared they were trying to “pretend to be human”.

We often laughed at this because it seemed so absurd but the more comical observations, she noted was when she went to Church.

She went to a fundamental Christian church in the Bible Belt area of the USA with her family. She used to joke about the reptilian hosts she would see at church “pretending” to be human and acting religious. She did say that not all “reptilians were evil” and that many were just trying to fit in and live as humans in human bodies.

She also saw how “reptilians in the workplace” often created miserable hierarchal environments and emotional dramas at work, feeding on the energy of others misery.

Another clairvoyant client who exudes that high quality, spiritual energy desirable by these energy predators, mentioned wanting to get back into the dating scene, after having gone through a terrible Dark Cupid relationship that nearly cost her her life.

She wanted to find men through church where perhaps a better quality man could be found, rather than the online dating sites, bars and other social environments for “normals”.

Well, lo and behold, she saw a good-looking man, who had been eying her several times, and seemed to have that alluring desire of connection, an excited look communicating a desire to meet each other. But as she observed closely, she was able to see that this man was hosting a reptilian entity, who would play the “energy games” that can happen with these types of people.

Even though he went to church – he still harbored an active reptilian entity, eager to get involved in a connection.

She was at first excited to find a man at church, but after she saw the entity within and the characteristic “reptilian energy” dynamics, she contacted me with her concerns.

“Will this ever stop? Why do they keep coming after me? Are they everywhere?”

Well, she had a good question…

There is something else happening, that goes beyond simple psychological explanations for those who find themselves repeatedly targeted by “interdimensionally hosted” energy vampire lovers or friends.

This goes into the phenomena of what I call “targeted inter-dimensional handling” and control of specific people who have been “target listed” for one reason or another.

It happens with authentic, spiritually gifted individuals, especially women who are from specific bloodlines who have been identified as starfire” women. It happens with men too of course.

This can include,

It can happen to people who have been identified by covert, experimental mind-control social engineering groups or independent black magicians as individuals who are identified as “different”, more aware or gifted spiritually.

Once targeted by one love bite relationship, they are often assailed by other “organic portal” types of people who are sent in by some kind of “hive minded” program to handle them in some capacity.

The handling may be specific to that individual, so that the “handler” is used to gather regular information about them, or their routine lives.

They may be involved just enough to keep them from establishing other relationships that could be more positive in terms of healing opportunities and sovereign spiritual empowerment.

Sometimes it is a relationship that dampens the frequency factor of the targeted persons psychological life, just enough so that the targeted person, (i.e.., a MILAB) remains in a lower vibration zone of consciousness to be continually “accessed” by their abductors.

Types of Souls

Of course this all sounds paranoid crazy, for those who haven’t experienced or witnessed it first hand.

In certain subpopulations of anomalous trauma, especially those who have had MK Ultra, ritual abuse and MILAB abduction histories it is more evident. But there is something else happening, that may be unrelated to these subpopulations, that indicates a deeper underlying reality of different types of “humans” that exist.

Some may call them ET hybrids, but I’m not certain that is what it is.

It seems to be more of a soul and spiritual difference between humans, that predisposes some to be natural “energy vampires” who predate specifically upon the more spiritually gifted types of humans who exude a type of energy highly sought after.

It wasn’t until I studied the research of Dr. Corrado Malanga on his regressive hypnosis findings with alien abductees employing the Triad Color Test, that I started to see that some people may not have a highly developed “higher self” component of consciousness. (Or a soul at all)

In Malanga’s work he attributes the Higher Self to the Soul or Anima. In other spiritual traditions the term used is Spirit, Higher Self, Atman or anandamaykosha.

In an earlier interview I conducted with Dorica Manu, a colleague of Dr. Malanga, I inquired about the distribution of people, as well as “aliens and ETs” who have Mind, Spirit and Soul components of the triad of consciousness.

Most of the “abducting aliens” who parasite humans only contained a mind component, sometimes a spirit component also but not a soul component. Most abductees contained all three components, since the aliens prefer to parasite those who have a good “Soul battery” of energy.

But not all the people assessed with the Triad Color Test appeared to have all three components in the triad of consciousness. Some had mind and spirit but not soul. Some had mind and soul and no spirit.

Some had souls who were tied into the Primordial Man.

Essentially we see that the distribution of “souled humans” is around 20-25% or a little less than one third of all humans.

“The secret of the Tree of Life is that the humans or human DNA, contains a compatibility with the frequency of the Soul. Apparently not all humans possess this DNA compatibility with the Soul.

Or to put it another way, Malanga discovered via the abductee Soul component testimonies, that only 20-25 % of humans are souled, or had this DNA soul compatibility issue.

(Alien Cicatrix, p. 21-26)

Another way to perceive this, which the latest discoveries of Dr. Malanga also confirm – is that the Soul of these people with apparently incompatible genetics stays behind in another dimensional reality, so that the “connect” aspect will not function within that life-genetic container. 

As Malanga would now say,

“These soul entities still remaining on the less dense energetic planes of existence – the so called ‘Higher Realms’ of Religion and New Age – are afraid to ‘come down’ and have the experience on the Earth plane”.

Gnostic Understanding of the Three Types of Humans

In the Gnostic literature mostly derived from the Nag Hammadi Library, it is written that three types of humans existed from the beginning.

They were the different offspring of Eve, two of whom were of Archontic origin, Cain and Abel. Some believe that these were also known as the Serpent Seed. The third and fourth offspring of Eve and Adam were Seth and Norea.

It is the latter two – the Norea and Sethian “incorruptible race” that is often mentioned as being the humans associated as the pneumatic or spiritual race. The spiritual race are those who have a greater degree of spiritual “remembrance or gnosis” of their eternal origins.

If this is true, then some Gnostic researchers say that one third of the human race is of the original “pneumatic race” while two thirds make up the psychic and hylic races.

Below is a multi scripture compilation describing the three types of humans and how they are mentioned and in what context.

Taken from A Gnostic Glossary by L. Carauana:

  • Gnosticism has developed a schema of three types of humans: the spirit-endowed Pneumatics, the soul-endowed Psychics, and the flesh-endowed Hylics.

  • The spirit-endowed Pneumatics (the Elect) are saved absolutely. The soul-endowed Psychics may be saved or damned.

    The flesh-endowed Hylics are inevitably ‘damned to destruction’:

“The spiritual race will receive complete salvation in every way.

The material will receive destruction in every way (…)

The psychic race, since it is in the middle when it is brought forth and also when it is created, is double according to its determination for both good and evil.”

(Tripartite Tractate 119:16)

  • The Apocryphon of John expands on this schema.

    There are two types of Pneumatics: those who avoid the corruption of the flesh and those who do not. Both as saved. Then there are the Psychics, who have souls but are without spirit.

    They are repeatedly re-incarnated until they acquire the gnosis. Then they are saved. Last of all those without the gnosis (the Hylics?), who are damned eternally.

  • First of all, those with the spirit (pneuma) who avoid corruption of the flesh – are saved:

“Those on whom the Spirit of life will descend (…) will be saved and become perfect and be worthy of the greatness and be purified in that place from all wickedness and the involvements in evil. (…) Such then are worthy of the imperishable, eternal life.”

(Apocryphon of John)

  • Second, those with the spirit (pneuma) who do not avoid corruption of the flesh – are still saved:

“Through the intervention of the incorruptible one, it is saved, and it is taken up to the rest of the aeons.”

(Apocryphon of John)

  • Third, those without the spirit (pneuma) are repeatedly re-incarnated until they acquire the gnosis – and are saved:

“After it comes out of (the body), it (the soul) is handed over to the authorities, who came into being through the archon, and they bind it with chains and cast it into prison (i.e. body), and consort with it until it is liberated from the forgetfulness and acquires knowledge. And if thus it becomes perfect, it is saved.”

(Apocryphon of John)

  • Fourth, those without the gnosis – are damned for eternity:

“(They will go) to that place where the angels of poverty go they will be taken, the place where there is no repentance. And they will be kept for the day on which those who have blasphemed the spirit will be tortured, and they will be punished with eternal punishment.”

(Apocryphon of John)

In “Jesus and the Lost Goddess” (Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy – 2001) the description of the psychic, hylic and pneumatic humans are also mentioned.

But rather than making this a literal genetic or race issue, it is described as a level of consciousness or spiritual initiation:

  • Hylics or materialists, identify themselves with the body – or circumference of the circle of self.

  • Psychics or ‘soulists’, identify with the psyche or soul – the radius of beingness.

  • Pneumatics, or ‘spiritists’ are aware of themselves as spirit or Consciousness – the center of the circle.”

(pp. 70-73)

If we can define the human as a central point of original consciousness with an expanding radius of being and awareness, we have the center point as spirit, central radius as psyche or soul and the outer circumference as body and ego identification.

“In Pagan, Jewish and Christian Gnostic traditions there are two basic stages of initiation which lead initiates progressively through these states of being. Christians called the first or psychic or soul initiation, because it initiates the journey from being a hylic to becoming a psychic.

They called the second the pneumatic or ‘spirit’ initiation because it initiates the journey from being a psychic to becoming a pneumatic.

Psychic initiates were taught the exoteric teachings or Other Mysteries of Gnosticism, which were openly available to all those interested in joining a particular Gnostic school.

Pneumatic initiates went on to be taught the secret esoteric teachings or Inner Mysteries. Literalist Christianity is the product of psychic initiates, uninitiated into the Inner Mysteries, making a religion out of the Outer Mysteries.

This is why the secret pneumatic teachings of Christianity which we are exploring seem so remote from Christianity as it is generally understood today.

The pneumatic teachings were kept a secret because the spiritually immature can easily be so baffled that they dismiss them as incomprehensible nonsense…”

To paraphrase, essentially the process of awakening began with the exploration of soul experience which was all about the psychic initiation process.

The essence was to know who you are from the personality standpoint, while developing empathy and good ethics. The pneumatic initiation was about discovering the experiencer or spirit Consciousness that is the ground of all experience.

The latter is similar to Buddhist higher level meditative insights where they realize there is no ego self per se, but rather a deeper connectedness to All. The larger Dreaming Self.

It is the All experiencing itself through the reflection of individual selves, and the sense of an all embracing love in this Oneness of being. It is a Mystery, and for those who have come to the place of Gnosis realize that they really know nothing, and instead realize this is an unfolding mystery of becoming and beingness.

Carl Jung often believed that the early Gnostics were really psychotherapists, who not only realized “Gnosis” by deep self-exploration, contemplation and compassionate activity, but they helped their spiritual-seeking brothers and sisters to self-discover the same thing.

Hybrids, Bloodlines and Reptilians

Today, we see that there is a huge emphasis on “genetics and bloodlines”, with a definite association with frequency quality of soul and spirit.

We also know that there are certain “supernatural gifts” and abilities which are passed only through certain “bloodlines”. This may actually have to do with the blood and bone marrow, (as well as genetics) and was understood by secret societies who followed bloodlines which passed on supernatural powers to their downline, such as children.

The blue blood is offered as an example of some blood “pneuma of numen” that can be passed on to immediate descendants (note that this is a Google translation from an original French article and references):

“The traditional interpretation of the blue blood is linked, by cons, to the transforming power of the Holy Spirit descending in the blood of those who make themselves worthy to receive it, such as in the traditional initiation, knightly accolade, the anointing, the anointing; but forgetting still not that the Spirit blows where he wills.”


This is why members of the same lineage seeking to protect their blood to prevent the dissolution of the “pneuma” of the “numen” linked to it.

But it also produces a degeneration, which may have led to the corruption of Zoroastrianism by the Chaldean/Babylonian. The concentration of “pneuma” produces the longest conservation body, particularly the bones, but if the transfer of this force is not completed or is corrupt, then the line is lost.

These transfer phenomena explain the sometimes instantaneous passage gifts of a healer to a member of his family.

“We have seen how the relationship between the numen of a lineage and descendants of the latter was maintained for centuries, and it must be said, a little too naturally, by consanguineous marriages, the blood ‘mixed’ (obtained by the union of individuals who are not related to each other) having the effect of forgetting the ‘blood memory’, which was particularly feared in these lineages.

It is this same quality that condemned to a sort of perpetual slavery descendants of a lineage as ‘prisoners of their blood’ which had only members of their lineage, not as individuals, such as rings of a chain link of prisoners and a past they would have to overcome to overcome individually, the power exercised by the animal soul through the blood.”


Such avoided if control is mentioned in the first book of Olga Kharitidi, where a shaman seeks to transfer the force of “egregore” of the line on a person who does not want to.

Also, if the pneuma of numen was weak in a person there were rites to increase this quality, based on ancient Egyptian and Jewish practices:

“If contact with the pneuma of numen becomes weak or broken, a rite can be done to revive it. This is palingenesis.

This is done ‘with the magical job centers of the ancestor, that is to say salts extracted from his bones. The origin of this practice dates back to the dawn of time’ (…)”

“It is also curious that in Egyptian magic remains perpetuated in Sudan was talking Guenon, we find the phenomenon of transformation of men into animals, especially from an entire population, demonstrating that among other there unquestionably has a hereditary passing of such power through the blood.”


With some survivors of ritual abuse histories, MK Ultra, MILABs and “starfire women”, they assert that their bloodline families and the beings who have exploited them are both human and non human.

This is elaborated on in Elisa E’s books, Beyond our Life in MK Ultra“, Book One and Two.

In Elisa E’s experience, she has a profound and chilling connection to the “Cain” entity, a non human – yet humanlike – extremely powerful being, who may have been the original Cain from the Bible.

This being is present as a powerful bloodline ally and inter-dimensional “handler” as well as rapacious lover and enemy all at the same time.

It is still a mystery, yet opens up many questions as to the reality of an actual genetic, racial reality of such hybrid beings interbreeding with humanity in specific bloodlines carrying on ancient occult traditions.

In Elisa’s book she goes into detail how she understands and has personally witnessed the “inter-dimensional handling” phenomena in her own experience as well as with people well known in the “alternative whistleblowing and Exopolitics” community.

In Carolyn Hamlett‘s testimony of surviving in a Satanic Ritual Abuse bloodline family, she describes the origin and ancestries of the Reptilian race, often associated with the Dragonline family crests.

She also is one of the few who explains the origins of the Reptilian race, as being a genetically engineered race created by the Nephilim to be a super warrior race.

She says that the Nephilim are hybrids between the original humans and Fallen Angels, and that the Reptilians are a hybrid between Nephilim and some reptilian species. The Reptilians contain some human DNA since the Nephilim are offspring of humans and Watchers and so are compatible.

Could the Fallen Angels also be the Archons of the Demiurge as written in ancient Gnostic literature?

There are two good interviews by Carolyn Hamlett with Dan Duval, that go into detail about the Reptilian Replication process, which I believe can explain many anomalies witnessed by those who have been told that they are of some reptilian hybrid bloodline.

A July 2016 interview goes into more detail on the Replication process from a single reptilian red blood cell that is incorporated into the human ovum before conception.

In the aforementioned article on Carolyn Hamlett’s experience she talks about a 5th Fire Initiation between two “twin flame” partners in order to bring in a powerful being into our reality, a hybrid birth.

Excerpt taken from above link article on Carolyn Hamlett:

“One of the more revelatory aspects of Carolyn’s discussion on Reptilians was the connection between a higher level powerful dark being, an Arcturian called Rommel.

(It is unknown whether this particular cult group and their “dark lords” are mimicking the name of Arcturians or if indeed these Arcturians are essentially playing on the dark side.)

This powerful being had to be brought to our 3D reality through a ‘portal created via twin flame union sexual ritual.

“It took the energy of a combined twin flame union of two humans, coupled with what Satan’s spiritual hierarchy calls “the 5th fire initiation” to open up the portal where many of Satan’s highest and most powerful were waiting to be able to gain entrance into our 3rd dimensional earth.

They needed humans to open up that portal because Satan does not have the spiritual authority to open that portal. 

Quick explanation:

Although Satan and his fallen are powerful, they do not have the “natural born” spiritual authority that humans were created with. It’s just a fact.

The human spirit is different than all other created creatures. The human spirit has what I call “the God code”. We have an essence of God the creator himself as his children.

EL: This is the real deal, and I believe many “MILABs” and even “experiencers of alien encounters” who have had astral visitations are experiencing these unions and are directed by their “MILAB handlers” and/or ET guides in the astral to participate without full consent and awareness in these kinds of activities.

The portal opening seems to occur spontaneously in some cases –  as can immediate “bilocation” of the unionized energy bodies of the twin flame couple to another dimensional reality. I have had at least one report of this. It can also happen in the physical, where a portal opens up or is created via a tantric type of soul mate union and ritual.

Often times when a portal or other dimensional reality opens up through the higher energies and consciousness of the couple, it’s spontaneous, and not directed by a ritual.

And is not EVIL per se. It’s just part of the side effect of the energies created through these kinds of tantric unions.”

It is interesting to note the name of the ritual called a 5th Fire Initiation, must occur between two twin flame humans.

It is my guess that the woman conceiving and needed for one of these rituals possibly needs to be a “starfire woman” of a particular bloodline. I do not think that this “starfire bloodline” is in and of itself “evil”.

It is something that I believe originated from a good, organic spirit sourced human being, perhaps an androgynous female in very ancient Edenic times. And that this particular bloodline of people – and especially women – has been co opted, exploited and controlled by a powerful occult cabal for nefarious purposes for millennia.

In Michael Tsarion‘s article about the “Female Illuminati” he states that most of the secret societies such as the Templars, and bloodlines related to the Merovingians, goes back to ancient Egyptian Atonists, and to the “Sisterhood of Death”.

He goes to great lengths to show how the secret rites go back to the Cult of Venus, which is also the worship of Lucifer.

He mentions how the female Illuminati are implicated in the Holy Blood – Holy Grail legend:

The Grail was brought from Jerusalem to France by Hugh de Payens who, after allegedly finding it beneath Temple Mount, gave it and other treasures into her keeping.

Of course the Grail is simply a clever metaphor for the Female Illuminati. The word grail comes from gradus, meaning “by degrees,” “stages” or “steps.”

This alludes to the grades of a Masonic-type society. This is the society headed by Mathilde and many others before and after the era of Chretian de Troyes.

A secondary meaning of the word is Sang Rael or “Holy Blood,” again a reference to the Sisterhood.

The word gradus was later wrongly rendered cratis meaning basket or container, hence the connection with a cup. Suggestively, on the architecture of the north porch of Chartres Cathedral (dedicated to the female), we see the figure of the Old Testament demigod Melchizedek holding a chalice.

Melchizedek is a cryptic reference to Akhenaton and the order descended from his progeny.

We see then that the true significance of the so-called Holy Grail is to be primarily understood in terms of a hierarchical secret society, and secondarily as a container of royal female blood.

We also see the significance of the Templars as supposed keepers of the “Grail.”

It is my intuition that not all of the individuals who retain these spiritual or supernatural gifts, as detected by specific genetics or soul frequencies are all “evil”. And in fact most of them are relentlessly hunted down by these secret occult groups. And they have been for centuries.

What I believe is that there was an original bloodline, or genetic race containing some genuine supernatural qualities (as opposed to the bloodlines which receive psychic powers from entities, fallen angels and demons) which could be passed on via maternal bloodlines and also associated with the “starfire” blood of specific women.

And that this bloodline was almost completely co-opted, exploited and controlled by the dark Lords associated with the secret societies noted above by Tsarion.

Which brings me back to at least one point that has been repeatedly brought up by some Dark Side of Cupid love bite experiencers.

  • Why do they keep repeatedly being targeted by vampiric and especially “reptilian hosted” agents who seem to be run by these inter dimensional beings?

  • And of course the biggest question by these people is, “what can I do to keep these parasites away from me?”

  • How can I build my life and authentic love relationships with a human being who is benevolently compatible and not like “the other predators?”



In order to understand the mystery of seemingly blind compliance to authority, there is perhaps no better sample of human nature than the 1961 experiments on “Obedience to Authority,” conducted by Dr.
Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University. His studies were spawned by the recent trial and execution of Adolph Eichmann.

The results were posted in Milgram’s “Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View” (1974).

Milgram focused on the propensity for obedience to authority, versus the role of personal conscience. His work was in consequence of the rationalizations and justifications for the Nazi acts of genocide – as offered by the accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Crime trials. The perpetrators’ defense was typically based on “obedience” – claiming that they were “… just obeying orders” under the authority of their superiors.

However weak the claim may have appeared, it was firmly believed, by the accused. In particular, the Nazi perpetrators were well educated and members of the German aristocracy.

The Eichmann trial stirred the question as to how easy it would be for ‘good’ and educated (American) people (college degree) to be conditioned to commit even murder – in exchange for simple “acceptance and approval.”

What if Eichmann, and his accomplices were, in fact, “….just following orders.”

More directly, the Milgram study demonstrated the propensity for people to submit to even ‘mild,’ even “presumed” authority – let alone threat or even internal fears. (Not even notable amounts of money were required.) The psychiatrists of the day forecast that 2% of any population would be compliant – the ‘sickos;’ the Milgram Study demonstrated 65%!

The setup of the experiment called for so-called “teachers” (unknowing subjects of the experiment) to be recruited by a newspaper ad offering $4.50 for one hour’s work. The ‘price’ is worth noting. The recruits all had college degrees. It is also worth noting that the setup time was remarkably brief; there was no extensive ‘conditioning’ required. Both of these factors attest to an apparent pre-disposition for submission to “perceived” authority.

The experiments would remind most of the TV series, “The Twilight Zone.”

The volunteer ‘teachers’ thought that they were recruited to take part in a psychology experiment investigating memory and learning. The recruits were introduced to a stern looking “experimenter,” dressed in a white lab coat; as well as an ordinary and pleasant co-subject (actor, in fact) who was presumably recruited via the same newspaper ad. The true subject (“teacher”) was assigned to direct the ‘learning’ of the other ‘volunteer; using electric shocks as a learning motivator.

The teacher-recruit was led to believe that he/she had been chosen randomly, to be a scientific ‘teacher.’

Both the actor and the ‘teacher’ were given a ‘sample’ 45-volt electric shock, to set the realism of the ‘stage.’ The “teachers” were told that the experiment was designed to explore the effect of punishment, to prompt correct responses for manufacturing learning behavior.

The ‘teachers’ were advised that the electric shocks were to be of increased by 15 volts, for each mistake that the ‘student’ made during the experiment.

The ‘teachers’ control panel had 30 switches, clearly labeled in 15 volt increments; ranging from 15 volts, up to the maximum of 450 volts. Each switch also had a rating label, incrementing from “slight shock” to “danger: severe shock”. The final two switches were additionally labeled “XXX”. Thus, the subject could not be the least bit ignorant of the potential consequences of his/her deeds.

The experiment environment had the ‘student’ in another room; with the ‘teacher’ made aware of the “actor-student’s” discomfort by poundings on the wall.

The actors (“students”) pretended to be stupid, seemingly requiring (deserving) increasing shocks – feigning pain, misery and unconsciousness. The “teachers” abided by the background ‘authority’ until they were doing the deeds of sadists & murderers – a convincing simulation, of course.

In reality, no further shocks were actually delivered. Again, the ‘teacher’ was unaware that the ‘student’ in the study was actually an actor who would use his talents to fake increasing levels of discomfort; as the ‘teacher’ administered what he/she assumed were increasingly severe electric shocks, for the supposed mistakes made by the “student”.

The ‘experimenter,’ with the white lab coat, was in the same room as the ‘teacher.’ Whenever the ‘teachers’ asked whether the increased shocks should be delivered, he or she was verbally encouraged by the experimenter to continue.

Amazingly, the test subjects didn’t question as to why the ‘experimenter’ needed a surrogate, in the first place.

Using actors as the student-victims, the actual test subjects (“teachers”) were directed to ask questions of a presumed “student,” sitting in a sealed booth, with the “teacher” delivering increasing electrical shocks, if the ‘student’ got the wrong answer. A presumed torturous-fatal electric shock was incrementally delivered, by 65% of the unwitting “teachers,” punishing the student to the very end of the 450-volt scale! No ‘teacher’ stopped before reaching 300 volts!

Worried ‘teachers’ did question the ‘experimenter,’ asking who was responsible for any harmful effects. It is worth noting that the primary concern was personal accountability, versus the welfare of the perceived victim. The ‘experimenter’ assumed full responsibility, with the ‘teachers’ accepting the response as adequate; then continued shocking their ‘student,’ even though some of the ‘teachers’ were obviously extremely uncomfortable with their deeds.

Return to another fact of life – cultures hide the fact that in times of crisis, people have a third choice, beyond ‘fight-or-flight; specifically, “Submission.” (Consider the rape victim!)

In the Milgram study, the test subjects were unwittingly submitting to rather mild coercion of their ‘handlers.’ They assumed that they were factually torturing – even killing – the ‘students,’ preferring the acceptance-approval of their handlers, to their basic personal values and even morality, itself. They questioned, but with mild coercion, they complied with ‘authority.’

From Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience” (1974), it is learned that Milgram solicited predictions on the outcome, from various ranges of people; including psychiatrists, faculty in the behavioral sciences, graduate students, college sophomores and even middle-class adults. Those polled reliably predicted that virtually all of the chosen subjects (‘teachers’) would refuse to obey the experimenter.

The psychiatrists, predicted that most subjects would not go beyond 150 volt level, when the actor-victim made the first explicit demand to go free. The psychiatrists expected only 4 percent of the ‘teachers’ to continue to the simulated 300 volt level, estimating that only a pathological personality (one in a thousand) would administer the highest voltage.

The Milgram Experiment was continued in a number of variable scenarios; such as the ‘student’ indicating discomfort by way of voice feedback (versus pounding on the walls of his ‘chamber’) – starting at the “150 volt” level. At that point, the ‘actor-victim’ requested that the experiment be ended.

The ‘teacher’ was consistently told by the experimenter that – “The experiment requires that you continue. Please go on.” or verbiage, to that effect. In that scenario, the percentage of ‘teachers’ who were prepared to administer the maximum of 450 volts, dropped slightly – to only 62.5%. Desperate verbiage, versus pounding on the walls, made little difference.

The environment of the experiment was considered, as well. The surroundings of the experiments seemed to cast an “aura of authority,” as well. When the environment of the experiment was conducted in a nondescript office building – versus within the walls of a prestigious and ornate hall on Yale’s campus – the percentage of ‘teachers’ who were prepared to administer the maximum voltage dropped to 47.5%.

Immediate environment also played a key role, demonstrating the ‘personal’ role of authority “proximity,” In one environment, the “experimenter” was at end of a phone line; versus being present in the same room as the ‘teacher. In this scenario, the percentage of ‘teachers’ who were prepared to administer the 450 volt shock dropped to 20.5%. In another scenario, the ‘teacher’ could independently elect the magnitude of the shock level; in that scenario, the percentage of ‘teachers’ who were prepared to continue to the extreme of the scale dropped to 2.5%.

That scenario, in particular, clearly demonstrated the role of “authority,” as the major influence over the behavior of the subjects, given that the test subjects’ performance otherwise fell into the predicted range of the psychiatrists.

Return to another idea – that the radical majority of any population lives in response to their “Sacred Illusions.” The spouse would NEVER cheat, one’s child could NEVER grossly misbehave. We all have such illusions.

Thus in the Milgram Experiment, the “Sacred Illusion” was that once agreeing to take on the task, the subject was committed/compelled to submit to authority – and not much of it – even to the extreme of presumed sadism/murder.

What is not addressed, to any adequate degree, is the role of “accountability” – factual or ‘assumed.’ By any account of history, the subservience contained the assumption that ‘authority’ served as a firewall, between the deeds of the performer, versus such accountability as criminal prosecution. The seeming ‘chain-of-command,’ obviously pre-supposes a ‘chain-of-accountability.’

In particular, in the Milgram experiments, the presumed “authority” to commit sadism and even murder, was a simple verbal assertion, “I am responsible; you are not.” To the ordinary person, it staggers the imagination that college educated people could be that naïve/compliant. Clearly most are.

Milgram’s experiments tested how much pain an ordinary, well educated, citizen would inflict on another person; upon being ordered to so, by an experimental scientist. In those experiments, “apparent authority” was tested against the strongest moral imperatives forbidding hurting another.

Even with the ‘teachers’ hearing screams of the ‘victims,’ authority won more often than not – 65% of the time, in optimum conditions. The experiments demonstrated the willingness of ordinary and educated adults to comply with the command of “perceived authority.”

Next one must ask what the uneducated person might do, as well as those with a known history of social deviance.

Ironically, the Milgram “obedience to authority” experiments preceded the Viet Nam War, with its bizarre rationalizations, and millions of American soldiers “…just following orders.” Tragically, the American soldiers suffered the fate of lepers, when returning home. More tragically, no lessons were learned by the American public, versus the nefarious minds of the American military and related corporate players.

Milgram had plenty of company. The “Milgram Experiment” has been repeated around the world with similar results.

It must be particularly noted that there is an implied risk-reward factor in such cases. 65% of Milgram’s subjects essentially murdered for $4.50!

The significance of that figure indicates implies that money is GENERALLY a minor concern. However, money can be made to be a factor. As starving graduate student may ‘hurry-up’ if $100 was offered, if the experiment was concluded in ½ hour; with verbal taunting by his ‘experimenter.’ What is the reasonable estimate of an ‘experimenter’ asking, “Do you want to ask questions, or do you want to get paid – and how much? The clock is ticking.”

Thus, it must be observed that if the ‘65% percentile can be rather easily stirred into sadism & murder, what does it take to get 95% of a given population to submit to the acceptance of propaganda – and a mandate for just ‘silence?’

Where do such experiments lead?

Back to Contents



Stanford psychology Professor
Philip Zimbardo, said to be a high school classmate of Milgram, took the issue of simple “authority” to the level of “power over others,” in his 1971 “Experimental Prison” study.

The essence of that experiment demonstrated the propensity for ‘normal’ people to succumb to primal deviant behavior. Of particular note is that the director of that experiment, Professor Philip Zimbardo, fell prey, as well. It took his soon-to-be wife, to shock him back to a civilized mindset.

While the ‘experiment’ was intended to be a simple role-playing observation platform; the players – and the researchers – ‘psycho-morphed’ into a deviant mindset, as though passing through a time-warp; into another solar system. Again, the primary mechanism was “Perception Control.”

In the “Stanford Prison Experiment,” the distinction must be made between ‘externally incited’ perception, versus spontaneous self-perception. As with the Milgram experiments, environment played a dominant role.

Zimbardo’s stated reason for conducting the experiment was to examine the ‘power’ of such variables as roles, regulations, group identities, symbols and “…situational validation of behavior,” which would probably repulse and disgust the ordinary individual.

In the background of the “prison” experiment, Zimbardo previously conducted research on what he described as “…de-individuation, vandalism and dehumanization;” in an attempt to illustrate how easily that ordinary people could be incited to engage in anti-social acts. The associated environment of the earlier experiments embraced situations where the participating individual felt anonymous, or wherein they could perceive others to be less than ‘human,’ as ‘enemies’ or even ‘objects.’

In the subsequent/consequent “prison” experiment, 70 young men were “arrested.” Most were college students, paid $15 a day for two weeks.

The brief duration of the experiment is highly significant, relative to the noted transformation of character.

The participants volunteered as subjects for an experiment on prison life; advertised by a local paper. They were put through the expected interviews and a battery of psychological tests. Twenty-four of those ‘arrested,’ deemed to be the most normal, average and healthy, were selected. They were assigned randomly, as either ‘guards’ or ‘prisoners.‘ The “prisoners” were booked at a real jail, blindfolded and driven to the college campus makeshift prison.

Bear in mind, that the players (test subjects) ALL were consciously aware that the mission was role-playing; not reality. Yet, in the fashion of “Lord of the Flies,” they devised their own social value system.

The ‘guards’ were issued uniforms; instructed not to use violence. They were told that their job was to maintain control over the prison.

On the second day of the experiment, the ‘prisoners’ staged a revolt. Once the ‘guards’ had crushed the rebellion, the ‘guards’ spontaneously increased coercive aggression tactics, against the ‘prisoners.’ Their tactics included the humiliation and dehumanization of the ‘prisoners.’ In consequence, the college staff had to frequently admonish the ‘guards’ against such tactics.

In particular, the worst noted instances of abuse took place in the middle of the night, when the guards believed that the college staff was not watching over the experiment. The treatment of the prisoners went to such tactics as forcing the ‘prisoners’ to clean out toilet bowls with their bare hands; acting out degrading scenarios. The ‘guards’ also urged the ‘prisoners’ to become snitches.

The loss of control caused the college staff to note the extreme stress reactions, forcing the release of five prisoners, one per day, prematurely.

See video:

 Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford prison experiment psychology of imprisonment 1970



Back to Contents



During the experiment, Zimbardo’s fiancé, Dr. Christina Maslach, began her observation of the experiment, starting the evening of the fifth day. Her role was to conduct subject interviews. In her words, she initially found it “dull and boring.”

During her assignment, she encountered what was described as a pleasant conversation with a “charming, funny, smart” young man awaiting the start his guard work shift. Independently, other researchers had previously advised her that they were watching a particularly sadistic ‘guard,’ nicknamed by both prisoners and the other guards as “John Wayne.” Dr. Maslach later discovered that “John Wayne” was the same young man that she had previously talked with.

The “compartmentalization” was extreme. In his “John Wayne” role, the person radically transformed; even speaking with a Southern accent. Even his body motions were different, as was his interaction with the ‘prisoners.’

She said, “It was like [seeing] Jekyll and Hyde…. It really took my breath away.”

It was clear that this ‘guard’ had gone to the adaptive extreme of inventing his own mythology, even in a known ‘make-believe’ world. His dissociative adaptation served as a firewall, between his actions and his conscience; even in a known time-limited environment. That, in turn, empowered his actions. Again, he was consciously aware that he was in a role-playing experiment – only.

Christina described that several prisoners engaged “John Wayne” in a debate; accusing him of enjoying his job.

He claimed that he wasn’t really like that; that he was just playing his assigned role. One ‘prisoner’ challenged “John Wayne” on the matter, citing the history that he had tripped him earlier, as he was taking the prisoner down the hall to the bathroom. The ‘prisoner’ addressed the fact that no researchers were around to witness the treatment, indicating that the act came out of “John Wayne’s” true character and disposition. “John Wayne” defended himself, insisting (rationalizing) that that if he let up, his role wouldn’t remain powerful.

Maslach described that she became sick to her stomach, while observing the ‘guards’ marching ‘prisoners,’ with paper bags over their heads, to the bathroom. She reported that her fellow researchers teased her about her reaction. Given the nature of the experiment and the credentials of the researchers, the divergence in ‘professional’ attitude is no small indicator.

After a later emotional encounter with her fiancé, Zimbardo was forced back to reality, becoming aware of the transformation of the researchers, ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners,’ alike. Thus, the experiment was terminated, given Maslach’s illumination of the matter of “professional accountability.”

Maslach married Zimbardo in 1972.

Automatically, one’s mind goes to the Iraq Abu Grhaib scandal; questioning how such events could happen, against such well-known studies as Milgram and Zimbardo; let alone the known Nazi horrors of W.W. II. There is a reasonable presumption that such would be far beneath the dignity of American troops.

However, it should not be lost that the deeds were not only admitted by the Pentagon and White House (with extreme reluctance), but were defended, with an insistence that the U.S. forces had a unique “right” to conduct torture, certainly levels of coercion, which clearly violated the Geneva Conventions. The world ignored the Geneva Conventions’ prohibition on the military use of penitentiaries; the prison use continued.

It should be noted, also, that Abu Grhaib was not the first, nor the exclusive location of such atrocities. Among other matters, the U.S. forces had bombed an Afghan POW facility, during the Johnny Spann/John Walker Lindh debacle, at Mazir I Sharif. Such was a grievous violation of the Geneva Conventions.

Yet, what does the global public believe?

Back to Contents



Next, go to the study of W.W. I “shell shock” and the near-zombies which that effect produced – as studied by the Tavistock Institute. Next, visit the LSD and amphetamine studies of the CIA’s “MKULTRA” project. Move onward, to the sciences of Propaganda, Psychological Operations and “Coercive Persuasion” (Jonestown tactics).

One quickly arrives at the ease of manufacturing a “Manchurian Candidate!” Oswald, Ruby, Sirhan, James Earl Ray, McVeigh; there are plenty of examples in the USA, alone. However, these will be more astutely observed as “Manchurian Patsies.”

The suggestion is that a reliable transformation process is available, which begins with the “shock” of hallucinogens; followed by a regimen of amphetamines, hypnosis and reinforcement methods; possibly to the extreme of drug addiction to amphetamines, in particular.

Back to Contents



“Perception Control = Emotional Control = Mind Control”

“Control” is the operative term. Is information presented with frequent repetition and passion? Or; is information kept totally secret – or prejudicially enshrouded with shame (“A ‘good’ person wouldn’t go there”)?

Is the “controlled” information factual, or has an illusion been created? The American media re-packaged the Muslims in the Balkan region as “Ethnic Albanians,” ignoring the Islamic role and their association with both bin Laden and the CIA. No one of prominence questioned the descriptor. Overnight a previously unheard of organization, “The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe” (OSCE) “recognized” new Balkan countries – instantly admitted into NATO.

Thereafter, Yugoslavia’s put-down of an internal rebellion was re-packaged as an attack against a NATO member & the Balkan War was on. The “Serbs” were attempting to return to their traditional Balkan homes, in the fashion of Jews returning to modern Israel. The media re-packaged their attempts as some form of invasion & the war progressed against Yugoslavia.

In the end, the ‘new’ nations borrowed billions from the International Funds & all sins were forgiven. The illusions worked! It was all a matter of “Controlled Perception.” The ‘new’ nations were now ‘controlled’ through the banking system.

America was content to believe (perceive) that they had rescued the deserving and victimized “Ethnic Albanians,” who made a good living smuggling heroin out of Afghanistan. America didn’t figure out the last part. By any rational logic, when the Taliban shut down the associated opium production; 9-11 was “on.”

“Perception” implies “impressionability;” does factually presented information penetrate the psyche of the intended audience? If American War Crimes are broadcast in Swahili; will the message ‘reach’ the exposed American audience? Extremely unlikely – even when translated into English.

Perception is also a function of “registration,” or “depth of consciousness.” Senator Warner reported on “Larry King” that the Afghan high-altitude food drops were practiced for nearly a year, before taking place over Afghanistan. How many spotted the time-line, asking why the drops were practiced for nearly a year PRIOR to 9-11? The presented information didn’t “register.”

“Perception” is also a function of resistance to ‘registration,’ – “denial.” All the clues in the world point to 9-11 being an inside-job; yet, few on the planet will tolerate the information to penetrate their belief system. Just the suspicion alone, results in global “shell shock” being effected.

The sum of trustworthy post 9-11 information points to American War Crimes, in the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. The thought is too horrible for most to tolerate – “denial” takes the day; “registration” will be minimal. The elements of ‘time,’ ‘distance’ and ‘shielding’ protect against the exposure to horrible facts.

“Perception Control” also relies on the element of “identification.”

A tribal leader in Africa commits genocide on a rival tribe – to the tune of millions of deaths. “America” can’t ‘identify’ with the problem; little is said or done. With racial apartheid being reversed in Africa; war, civil war, starvation and the AIDS epidemic deny Caucasian ‘identification;” Africa has been cleared to die, save some profitable enterprises, benefiting American corporations – whether drug companies, diamond & mineral companies or arms dealers.

Conversely, with the coverage of 9-11, and the associated propaganda, America “identified” with the supposed threat of Saddam Hussein – per the media presentations. The factual non-connection of Saddam to 9-11 made little difference; fear ruled. “Perception Control” and “authority” took command of the American psyche. The UN reported that no viable evidence of Saddam’s alleged WMDs could be found. That information came from ‘boots-on-the-ground’ inspectors. The media didn’t report that finding to any appreciable degree; the war was on.

In Hermann Goerings famous description:

“All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

It was all in the “perception” and “authority.”

“Perception Control” additionally implies the element of “pertinence” and “regard.” If the media reports a tree falling in a forest; does anyone care? If an expose’ cites the media for NOT reporting that tree falling, does anyone care?

In the fashion of “..the dog that didn’t bark,” when something representing a major concern is methodically unreported, what pertinence and regard goes with that non-reporting carry – if any? Silence can be constructively ‘deafening.’ In the aftermath of 9-11, it was reported that the NSA furnished the FBI with only useless information. With second thought, it is worth asking whether that data, instead, represented the fact that the purported ‘terrorists’ simply didn’t exist, in the first place. Certainly, the last premise is more easily supported, than the ‘official’ version of 9-11.

As of the end of 2005, globally, somewhere around 160 people were killed over three years by the “Bird Flu.” The common cold and ‘regular’ flue kill radically more, with associated pneumonia. Yet, the American media keeps reporting the “Bird Flu” information, as though it was an airborne variant of HIV. To date, the American public is trying to discover the importance of such a minor killer, oblivious to the fact that the American tax coffers are being drained, as though there was a viable “Bird Flu” threat to America.

The media won’t track the “research” money, nor report on the low element of “pertinence” to the safety of Americans.

The media does NOT report the associated methodical draining of the U.S. tax coffers by war or other “government” expenses. The Pentagon, alone, hasn’t accounted for trillions of dollars – but the media won’t report information which is ‘pertinent’ to the American worker, or allow for adverse ‘regard’ for that information.

Similarly, the media evades the “pertinence” and “regard” behind the fact that $40 billion American tax dollars haven’t rebuilt a single “Katrina” home in New Orleans. Those who got rich on the “Katrina” money come under the ‘authority’ banner of “Don’t ask; don’t tell.”

“Perception Control” allows “distortion.”

The media doesn’t report the incremental shutdown of the Medicaid and Social Security System – ignoring the fact that the affected Americans PRE-PAID their own benefits. The recipients are, instead, treated as parasites. Imagine being labeled a ‘parasite’ for collecting on an automobile insurance policy, following a bad car crash.

“Perception” is a function of specific focus (control). In the current time frame, the NSA domestic spying scandal is the “American uproar” – ignoring the fact that the Pentagon had a comparable domestic spying program – both being illegal as hell. With the media being ‘focused’ on the NSA domestic spying scandal, America is distracted from the most important of the two issues, inadvertently ignoring the Pentagon domestic spying scandal – and the related “Posse Comitatus” law.

Applying “Perception Control,” the media authenticated “authority,” by relaying the ‘opinions’ of White House Lawyers – one of whom was conveniently made head of the Bush Justice Department. The “perception” is that attorney opinions somehow cancel laws and judicial rulings. America overlooks the fact that attorneys render only ‘opinions;’ courts render interpretations.

Psyops tactics aside, lying with passion in your voice doesn’t manufacture truth. Anything approaching “Gestapo” is as Anti-American as it can get.

So, how does one sort out the domestic “spy” business?

  1. Attorneys render legal OPINIONS: Courts render legal INTERPRETATIONS. Yet, a team of White House Lawyers is cited as the spying ‘authority’ to bypass the FISA law. Attorneys are constructively enacting laws.

  2. The Iraq campaign didn’t involve a “Declaration of War.” The authority was the “Authorization for Use of Military Force.” (AUMF) There is a radical difference between the two. [Note the term “military”]

  3. If the AUMF is cited as the “spy” authority, then note the AUMF provision – “….- Nothing in this resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.” (15 days, max on warrantless wiretapping.)

  4. If the NSA isn’t considered to be ‘military;’ then FISA mandates warrants.

  5. If the NSA is considered to be ‘military,’ then the “Possee Comitatus” statute and the associated military guidance additionally prohibit the “search and seizure” MILITARY authority, that Bush claims.

  6. Remember that the Pentagon had an independent and illegal domestic spying program. While the military can legally receive domestic intelligence, as an act of opening its own mail, Title 18 mandates the relay of the information to the appropriate law enforcement agency (FBI). Failure to do so is “Misprision of a Felony,” under Title 18.

  7. With the White House keeping the Mexican border as wide-open, as possible, how much factual “terror” can there possibly be?

Back to Contents



In a broader ‘perception’ horizon, examine Stanley Milgram’s 1960s experiments on authority vs. obedience. The key factor being the associated “perceptions,” relative to that “authority.”

Milgram studied the rationalizations and justifications for the Nazi acts of genocide – as offered by the accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Crime trials. The perpetrators’ defense was typically based on “obedience” – claiming that they were “… just obeying orders” under the authority of their superiors. However weak the claim may have appeared, it was firmly believed, by the accused. Such was their “perception.”

Certainly, the “Stanford Prison Experiment” elaborated on the matter.

Perception is essentially a trinity – the self perception “…how I think of the matter,” the espoused perception, “…how I would like everyone else to view the matter;” and the public perception, “…how the preponderance of the public views the matter.”

The idea essentially goes back to the old adage,

“There are three sides to every story, yours, mine and the facts.”

The difference in the three is a matter of ‘filters;’ is the matter clear to all? If not; why not? Does anyone even know what actually happened? If not; why not? How is the “perception” filtered and/or directed?

How many times has an airplane disappeared – with no discoverable clue as to what happened? Was it hijacked? Was it stolen, did the pilot get lost, crash into a high mountain glacier, or at sea?

Is the factual information “controlled?” Ron Brown’s B-737 was reported to have crashed in the “…storm of the decade.” History records that the factual weather wasn’t particularly bad. Yet, what did/does the preponderance of America believe? The “Controlled Perception” ruled the matter.

Most importantly, the FIRST presented perception controlled the matter.

Disregarding intense propaganda, there is no viable evidence that a 757 crashed at the 9-11 Pentagon or in Pennsylvania. What does the preponderance of the entire world believe? Thereafter, it’s a matter of “Plausible Assertion” or “Plausible Denial.”

If one reads the Vince Foster documents, he killed himself with three different weapons, with his ghost later driving his car to the nearby parking lot.

In such cases, one is forced to formulate an estimate of probable history, based on available information, or reasonable assumptions.

“Perception” is obviously sometimes a unique function of “authority.” The Christian Crusaders went off to commit atrocities, under the “Church” message, “God wills it!” Nazi Storm Troopers did the same, being advised, “Gott mit uns!” (“God is with us!”) The role of “authority” was to serve as a perceived reliable barrier against possible accountability and punishment; even unto God.

However, the “perception” and “authority” have to be credible. George Bush Jr. is more selfish. According to him, God told him, personally, to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. He later stated that God acted through him. Given the media “dropping” the matter (Perception Control), no one cares to talk about those claims.

Bush’s claims exceeded the assertions of Hitler!

Hitler’s Nazis serve as a classic example of the extremes of human behavior – and how it comes about; how “perception” blended with “authority.”

A typically unmentioned part of nefarious deeds is the matter of “accountability.” When ‘institutionalized’ authority takes a wrong turn, where does the issue of accountability fall, relative to time. Had Hitler won, for example, his leaders and soldiers would have had no accounting. Yet, in the immediate time of a nefarious decision-making, the issue of accountability takes on the aura of context, relative to time.

History often frames “context;” convicted criminals are routinely put to death as ‘historic’ villains – by the “authority” of the State. The Nuremberg trials executed ‘deserving’ criminals. Many cases of raw street revenge are overlooked, given the ‘context’ (perception) of history – versus personally estimated probability of accountability.

It is no secret that the Nazi “obedience” was commonly motivated by fear of execution, prison internment; or at least a transfer to the dreaded Russian Front. Few verified the potential consequence of questioning or refusing, versus “…just following orders.” The extended concern is the fate of the affected individual’s family, for better or worse. One can only ponder what they might do, under similar fear levels. Openly or subtly, “authority” controlled “perception.”

The S.S. executioner had to evaluate the effect of time, as a factor in his accountability. If he was certain that his side would win, he proceeded with minimal interference of human conscience. Or, he may have been uncertain of victory, but he may have been quite certain of his own fate on the Russian front, if he disobeyed – or questioned – an order to kill. Add the fate of his family. “Authority” assured him that he was on the winning side.

The ‘conscience test’ of all time seems to be in the personal estimation of “…what people will say.” (AND – the estimate as to whether or not “they” may never find out; or figure it out?)

Another factor which is rarely addressed, is the matter of “stakes;” personal risk or actual expenditure. In current times, the religious zealots are betting their life and their fate in all of eternity, to perform suicide bombings – even against innocent women and children. The implication is that the bombers perversely view themselves as ‘holy’ martyrs, favored by God; no sacrifice being too great for God.

There also exists a “personal identification gap” between those who monstrously committed the Nazi atrocities, of their own accord, and those who did the same, under extreme duress. The Nazi monsters had their share of conscience-driven suicides.

However unpopular (and little-known) the issue may be, it is also necessary to objectively observe the history of Jews participating in such organizations as the “Jewish Committees,” who selected other Jews for the Nazi death camps; add the “Jewish Police” of the Nazi ghettos. Those participants continued to live amongst their own; their ‘authority’ was remote, however reliable. Certainly, they had to think it terms of their fate; and that of their family.

In modern times, a little-known driver behind the modern corporation is the fact that a high percentage of employees are as positively responsive to a letter of commendation from ‘authority’ in their personnel file, as they would be to a sizeable check.

Taking that idea further, the ‘value’ in such letters is often reduced by ‘authority’ employing impotent descriptors as “acknowledge,” versus “recognize,” “applaud” or “congratulate.”

Obviously, pay levels, benefits and retirements are a huge determining factor. ‘Authority’ determines whether a military General abides by White House insistence, with an associated promotion, or retires two pay grades early.

Thus, it is also necessary to observe the dynamic of authority, versus propensity for subservience.

One of the major lessons of Hitler’s Nazism was that the true ‘force’ behind that monster was the “perception” of the populace – asking, “What does the Fuhrer want?” The key was in controlling the associated “perception.”

Thinking to the electric battery, what happens when a “political battery” (potential energy – with positive and negative terminals) of Nazi methodologies is ‘hooked-up’ to a given populace?

The world should never forget that Hitler nearly won. Currently, the world is compelled to think to the forces behind this re-designed version of Nazism, referred to as the “New World Order.”

“Those who refuse to think outside the proverbial ‘box’ are imprisoned in it; and destined to be buried in it.”

Back to Contents



Except for two aircraft hitting the WTC towers, try to think of an ‘official’ position on 9-11 which has turned up as fact.

  1. The FBI’s Robert Mueller cited the fact that no documentation linked al Qaeda to 9-11. Later phony al Qaeda “assertions” didn’t hold up under scrutiny.

  2. There is no documented record of the purported 9-11 terrorists making a plane reservation; there is no “record locator,” complete with details.

  3. There is no documented record of the purported 9-11 terrorists buying or using a ticket. (IDs required)

  4. There is no hard-copy of a printed ticket ‘copy.’

  5. There is no record of the purported 9-11 terrorists on any of the passenger manifests, with all legitimate passengers being accounted for.

  6. There is no record of the purported 9-11 terrorists in the autopsies.

  7. There is not as much as a suggestion that the purported 9-11 terrorists had the needed pilot skills – but rather the contrary.

  8. At least seven of the purported 9-11 terrorists are known to be still alive – with no questions being asked.

  9. No rational person can believe that the supposed lead hijacker’s passport could survive the WTC strikes, let alone be ‘immediately discovered’ in the 9-11 rubble.

  10. The presented ‘security’ pictures of the 9-11 hijackers don’t match the purported terrorists.

  11. Despite the origins of the alleged hijackers, there was no in-country (Saudi Arabia & Pakistan) follow-up on the alleged hijackers’ links to terrorists. In some fashion, the alleged hijackers either disappeared, or were alleged to have used the names of seven living persons (with no identity ‘discovery’ follow-up.)

  12. Bush’s frantic escape via Barksdale Air Force Base went un-explained, as it emerged that the “”…real, specific and credible” threats turned up as imaginary – and methodical.

  13. The convenient ‘bureaucratic fog” – alleged to have allowed 9-11 to happen – went unexplained and un-investigated, as the American segment of the bin Laden family was immediately whisked away on private aircraft – amidst “instant” bureaucratic efficiency. Certainly, the ‘convenient’ failures went unpunished – if not rewarded.

  14. For the first time in history, not one, but THREE steel-framed buildings were taken down by fire; magically falling onto their own footprint. The events involved two different architectural design styles, two different causes, but owned/controlled by a single entity. NO QUESTIONS ASKED & NO ASSOCIATED INVESTIGATION!

  15. A stopwatch says that THREE buildings at the WTC came down as controlled demolition. Add the video captures of the sequenced controlled-demolition blasts.

  16. There is no way to account for the purported WTC ‘collapse’ temperatures alleged by the ‘official’ line.

  17. There is no viable evidence of a plane crash at the 9-11 Pentagon or in Pennsylvania – versus salted wreckage pieces. In the case of the Pentagon, they were even the wrong color! NO QUESTIONS ASKED & NO ASSOCIATED INVESTIGATION!

  18. Despite the alleged failures of Airport Security, the situation methodically deteriorated to a Gestapo joke, as huge amounts of tax dollars were insanely spent on the TSA.

  19. For all the failures, no official has been punished for 9-11. (with trivia such as a general who had an affair being sacked, in the background.)

  20. The “official” 9-11 investigation was grossly under-funded, producing approximately 800 pages of documents after the White House censorship and interference.

  21. In the end, the 9-11 Commission also failed to identify foreign terrorists as the perpetrators of 9-11. The so-called “investigation” was so much political rhetoric – hardly anything more.

  22. That left the Afghan and Iraq invasions as blatant War Crimes. America fell into an identical “denial” mind-set of 1939 Nazi Germany. That was no coincidence of history!

  23. There were no WMDs. Prior to the invasion, the ‘boots-on-the-ground’ UN teams reported no significant findings. Saddam has been long deposed. Iraq had no possible connection to 9-11. For all the horrors of the USA-made Saddam, his crimes are dwarfed by the tribal genocide of Africa. How did Saddam become the ‘humanitarian’ priority?

  24. Given the above, Bush’s invasions continue as War Crimes!

  25. For all the “terror” threat levels posted, the Mexican border has been forced wide open from the White House; a “terrorist’s” dream-come-true. How much “terror threat” can possibly be factual?

Yet, repeatedly, the world is SUCCESSFULLY inundated with the assertions of “terrorism.”

One is left to question, with so many inescapable indicators of 9-11 being a “Reichstag Fire,” why nothing was said, for all intents & purposes? Because the nefarious science of PSYOPS was cleverly and effectively foisted upon America – and the world – by the mass media!

The harsh truth behind the obvious “mission” is hiding in plain sight! It’s to be discovered in such books as Brezinski’s “The Grand Chessboard,” Barnett’s “The Pentagon’s New Map,” and the documentation of the so-called “Project for a New American Century.” (PNAC) In essence, “Amerika Uber Alles!” No denial is possible!

America’s legacy is destined to be found in the mental- emotional wilderness between “Don’t ask; don’t tell” and “We didn’t WANT to know!”

Back to Contents


“Perception Control = Emotional Control = Behavior Control.”

Lord Acton probably answered that question in the most simple terms – “Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts – absolutely!” The experienced attest that in “power” environments, there is a mysterious and overwhelming aura which seemingly ‘posseses’ the individual.

As with the physical weapons of war, psychological operations have legitimate uses. But, when those means are used on a domestic population, what then?

To give a wartime pistol to a policeman, telling him to keep the domestic peace is effective. When that same pistol is then used to coerce, intimidate or threaten the domestic populace, something has to be done. It starts with knowing how that pistol operates.

It may seem strange to suggest that the study of propaganda has relevance to contemporary domestic politics and issues. When most people think about propaganda, they think of the enormous campaigns waged by Hitler and Stalin in the 1930s – or McCarthy in the 1950s. Since nothing comparable is being disseminated in our society today, many believe that propaganda is no longer a pertinent issue. WRONG!

Propaganda can be as blatant as a ‘peace symbol’ or as subtle as a song or poem. Propaganda’s persuasive techniques are regularly applied by politicians, advertisers, journalists, radio personalities, and others who are interested in influencing human behavior. Propaganda messages can be used to accomplish positive social ends, as in campaigns to reduce drunk driving, but they are also used to win elections and to sell beer.

Propaganda isn’t inherently nefarious or suspect. Often, as in typical advertising or political campaigns, propaganda is totally expected!

  • “Propaganda” is an advantageous presentation of information – factual or otherwise.

  • “Psyops” takes unfair advantage of human psychology. Therein lays the difference – “INTENT.”

The propagandist is a clever researcher and writer. The disinformationist has the added background of a psychologist – to some extent – as well as being a ‘resourceful’ and ‘surgical’ communications specialist. He operates from a time-constrained mission.

Whether we want to admit it or not, PSYOPS is in our daily life – it is a serious threat.

Thus, we are in a comparable position of a banker. He knows that there will always be robbers and swindlers. The gimmick is in being smarter and more resourceful than the robber-swindler. The chief effort is to let the would-be robber-swindler know that the defense mechanisms are too strong; add the risks and probability of getting caught.

PSYOPS is generally about the control of human emotions; the resulting ‘processed emotions’ translating into desired intellectual (logical) decisions and subsequent actions.

Think to the statement,

“Nobody can MAKE you feel a certain way; each person has to DECIDE how they feel about something – decide for themselves.”

Great logic!

  • Now, go to the major sales corporations & ask them why they spend millions per year on advertising!

  • OR; call an “ethnic” type by their least-favorite name and see what decision is made – over the span of a split second!

The reality is that we all have the ability to inspire or persuade thoughts or emotions in others. The trick is to inspire advantageous decisions. Ask the husband/boyfriend who brought home the flowers to his lady. Were some ‘results’ forthcoming? Of course they were, whether romance – or forgiveness. Emotions = action.

The technical advance of communication tools such as the Internet, accelerate the flow of persuasive messages – dramatically. For the first time ever, citizens around the world are participating in uncensored conversations about their collective future. This seems like a wonderful development; but there is a risk.

“Information overload” is often the result of people being regularly confronted with hundreds of intense messages, each day. Common sense and personal experience dictates that many people respond to the induced pressure by processing messages as quickly as possible and, when possible, by taking mental short-cuts.

That kind of response leaves the modern propagandist or disinformationist with a mandate to devise accommodating short-cuts, so as to be effective in dealing with typical thought or emotional processing. The disinformationist reacts with an effort to effectively control/agitate emotions, exploit insecurities, capitalizing on language ambiguity – inherent or induced – and by bending or re-manufacturing the rules of logic.

History demonstrates that the disinformationist can be quite successful. Gaining attention and controlling perception is the disinformationist’s first priority, in the modern mind-control equation:

“Perception Control = Emotional Control = Behavior Control.”

That leaves specialists and even common people with the task of detecting and analyzing the disinformation and/or propaganda, so as to create the needed awareness of the tricks which disinformationists employ. The secondary obligation is to devise ways of readily recognizing and resisting the subsequent short-cuts that the disinformationists promote.

In brief, disinformation/propaganda analysis is the best immediate antidote to the nefarious excesses of the Information Age. Just as the military deals with “Information Warfare” as a major munition in their arsenal, the civilian world is comparably involved in the topic – like it or not.

As an example of the seriousness associated with the modern application of domestic propaganda, the Institute for Propaganda Analysis (IPA) published a series of books, including:

  • The Fine Art of Propaganda

  • Propaganda Analysis

  • Group Leader’s Guide to Propaganda Analysis

  • Propaganda: How To Recognize and Deal With It

The IPA centers its illustrations on seven basic propaganda devices: Name-Calling, Sparkling Generality, Transfer, Testimonial, Plain Folks, Card Stacking, and Band Wagon.

In “The Fine Art of Propaganda,” the IPA makes the point that,

“It is essential in a democratic society that young people and adults learn how to think, learn how to make up their minds. They must learn how to think independently, and they must learn how to think together. They must come to conclusions, but at the same time they must recognize the right of other men to come to opposite conclusions. So far as individuals are concerned, the art of democracy is the art of thinking and discussing independently – together.”

Another interesting book was written by Richard Brodie, “The Virus of the Mind.”

The book carefully describes the creation and conditioning of certain social and political values, logic processes and seeming behavioral mandates in the mind of the American culture. The essence of the book cites the automatic mental and emotional reflexes which have been methodically conditioned into the ‘norms’ of the American society.

How many times in American society has the statement “You can’t say that” successfully stopped a conversation? It’s quite common. Imagine that statement being controlling in the proverbial ‘land of the free.’ Certainly the constraining descriptor, “Politically Correct” has been dramatically effective, amidst often mandated “diversity training.”

The book describes the “reflexive” intellectual, emotional and social reactions in terms of “memes.”

While the term seems to distract, the content of the book is otherwise quite good.

Imagine the traditional American society being taken away, one slice at a time. Those old enough can testify that America has seen just that. In one secretly planned operation, “
Operation Northwoods,” the comparable description is “time-phased changes.” Rather like the alcoholic asking, “Oh, what is one more drink going to hurt?” Take enough pennies away from a dollar, and the dollar is totally gone!

Conversely, the effect can be equally dramatic. Compare the tax rate of the Korean War era to today’s world! Then note the tax-dollar rip-off programs – if you can spot them!

The incremental increase of tax rates leaves America working for the ‘government,’ not themselves. Yet, Americans are worse off, by far, than the early 1950s.

Common techniques

In real estate, the three guiding rules are “Location, location, location!” In the world of PSYOPS, the comparable rules are “Timing, timing, timing!” In the world of PSYOPS, the weakest tool can be effective, given the element of TIMING.

One of the most important applications of ‘timing’ is the dynamic of ‘first-up;’ the proverbial ‘early bird.’ Given the dynamics behind the events of 9-11, they become a classic for all time. 9-11 was an inside-job; get used to that.

With no documentation linking al Qaeda to 9-11, per the FBI’s Robert Mueller, al Qaeda became the instant villain. Osama bin Laden issued a formal denial in an audio tape; but the ‘first-up’ effect was already in place. With that background, an obviously phony video tape was played before America, attempting to implicate bin Laden.

We know it worked – that’s PSYOPS. AND, look at what that PSYOPS accomplished!

(Don’t get enthralled by the effect, the 9-11 PSYOPS story is very ugly. It may mean the death of America, as we knew it. If in doubt, read the “Patriot Act.”)

“Timing” can also be a major clue to the astute observer. To be ‘first-up’ may also indicate who the villain actually is. Those who support the ‘first-up’ may be peripheral villains.

In the immediate aftermath of 9-11, the ‘official line’ was,

“There were no warnings. When that was illustrated as a lie, the claim was changed to “….specific warnings.”

As though any perpetrator is going to advertise his intentions in the Sunday Times!

As time went on, more and more ‘warnings’ were illustrated; along with the history of the warnings being silenced with prejudice – from within. Out of the Hollywood version of “Godfather,” comes the same dynamic – “…the first person…”

Timing is important for many reasons.

“Bad names” have always played a tremendously powerful role in the entire history of the world; as well as in our own personal development. Names have ruined and killed people; but, they have also stirred men and women to outstanding deeds and accomplishments. Names and labels have ruined the lives of people and have sent many to prison.

Names and labels have made men angry enough to enter battle and slaughter their fellow men – or to die for the declared named or labeled cause. Names and labels have been applied to people, groups, associations, churches, tribes, gangs, colleges, political parties, neighborhoods, states, regions of the country, nations, and races. Many tremendous results have been effected – just with a name or label.

In American history, the “McCarthyism” ruined lives of truly great people, just with the simple implication of “Communist;” no proof required! Even today, descriptors such as “Commie,” “Pinko” and “Leftist” bring a programmed emotional reaction.

In Current politics, “politically undesirable” has been labeled as “evil” or “terror.” Laws have been passed on these elements, as though one could comparably outlaw the darkness of night. Yet, the strategy worked, the draconian laws were passed!

The name-calling technique of the disinformationist usually links a person, or idea, to a negative symbol, of some type. Beyond pure propaganda, the disinformationist crafts the name-calling into a form which has an emotional effect on the targeted audience. The usual style is to inject ‘distrust,’ into any association with the targeted individual/issue.

The disinformationist who uses this technique hopes that the targeted audience will mentally AND emotionally reject the person or the idea on the basis of the negative symbol, instead of objectively looking at the available evidence.

Again, the element of “INTENT” is key. To cite some of Bush’s cabinet members as ‘felons,’ warns the listener, however negative the image is.

The most obvious type of name calling involves generally accepted ‘negative’ names.

For example, consider the following:

  • Commie

  • Nazi

  • Fascist

  • Pig

  • Yuppie

  • Queer

  • Terrorist

  • Leftist

  • Neocon

However, the relative position of the name-calling ‘assailant’ or the ‘victim’ is a factor. “Expensive” is bad to a buyer, but wonderful to a seller. A more subtle form of name-calling involves words or phrases that are selected because they possess or create a negative emotional charge.

A responsible Pentagon official may propose specific military budget cuts. Instead of being labeled as “wise” or “fiscally conservative,” the official gets labeled as “stingy.” Either description can refer to the same behavior – with an extreme of different connotation.

Other examples of negatively charged words include:

  • politically correct

  • social engineering

  • connected

  • radical

  • corrupt

  • cowardly

  • counter-culture

The name-calling technique leaves the casual observer with the logical mandate to ask intelligent questions when spotting “name-calling.” Not all “name calling” is inappropriate or counter-productive. If a female politician cites a colleague or opponent as a ‘sweetheart,’ the connotation isn’t particularly inappropriate or negative.

To cite Saddam Hussein as a ‘monster’ is dynamic; although a highly negative imagery. However, subjectivity is important in such matters. Referring to a man as a ‘sweetheart’ may ruin the day of a feminist. Referring to Saddam as a ‘monster’ may stir a Muslim supporter to violence.

The appropriate questions:

  • Is the name calling appropriate?

  • Would a reasonable person find the name-calling personally tempting?

  • What is the intention behind the name calling?

  • What does the name imply?

  • Does the idea in question have a legitimate connection with the typical association behind the name?

  • Is an idea or thought process which serves a given person’s or group’s best interests being discounted/dismissed through such name calling?

  • Omitting the name calling, what are the merits in the remainder of the message?

Almost any culture claims to believe in, fight for and live by “virtuous words.” These “words” are normally associated with deeply set attitudes and ideas. In the USA, such words include: civilization, civic, morality, justice, equality, Americanism, God, Christianity, good, proper, right, democracy, patriotism, family, motherhood, fatherhood, science, medicine, health, natural and love.

For the purposes of propaganda/disinformation analysis, call these virtue words “Sparkling Generalities” focusing attention upon the dangerous characteristic that they have: They mean different things to different people; thus they can be used in different ways. The trick being in the controlling of context or association of the generalities.

Disinformationists prey upon the selected words, as we typically understand them or relate to them. Through scientifically styled means/methods/techniques, disinformationists prostitute the cherished words and beliefs and attitudes of unsuspecting people.

When Americans hear the word ‘democracy,’ they typically think of their own definite ideas about democracy, the ideas learned at home and school. “Mom, apple pie and the girl next door” come to mind. The typical reflex is to assume that the term is being used in that particular sense. The ‘virtue word’ lowers the ‘caution threshold,’ deferring any suspicion or mistrust; particularly when listening about the things ‘the United States must do to preserve democracy.’

However, when one hears of ‘democracy’ in 2003 Iraq, the proverbial ‘red flags’ pop into view. The term is the same, the ‘association’ is different; very different. The image of a burning Humvee comes to mind, along with the image of dead or wounded GIs.

In essence, the employment of the “Sparkling Generality” is the reversal of “Name Calling.”

Name Calling seeks to make us fear and/or reject the cited entity. The intention is for the targeted audience to formulate a judgment to reject and condemn the victim of the name-calling, without bothering to examine the evidence. The Sparkling Generality device, conversely, seeks to make us identify with, approve and accept the generality without examining the evidence.

Exporting American Democracy to Iraq sounds noble to the typical American. However, given the “Patriot Act,” what is actually being exported? In examining the “Sparkling Generality Device,” all that is said regarding Name Calling / Labeling must also be kept in mind.

The observer should ask:

  • What image is the ‘virtue’ word intended to convey?

  • Does the presented idea in question have a legitimate connection with the general/typical meaning of the word?

  • Is this an attempt to prostitute an idea which does not serve the observer’s best interests?

  • Is it being “sold” or “spun” through its being given an association or name that the typical and reasonable observer isn’t likely to buy into?

  • Omitting the “virtue word,” what is contained in the remainder of the ‘message?’

An attitude is an imbedded personal style of dealing with information or events.

Think to the common expressions,

“Why should I?”

“What’s in it for me?”

“I could care less!”

“Live and let live.”

“No shame in my game!”

In that context, Americans are routinely conditioned to respond to information and events with a conditioned ATTITUDE. In the ‘first up’ style of the 9-11 presentation, America predictably responded in patriotic fashion. With the conditioning of such horrors as the 1993 bombing of the WTC and the Oklahoma City bombing, the mass media presentations stirred a revenge reflex; America seemingly had suffered enough “terrorism.”

The ATTITUDE was highly predictable – “I’ve had enough! Nobody is going to get away with this!”


A popular belief system asserts that it is wrong to ‘lay’ your expectations on another, demanding a specific accommodation. However, a clear mind quickly remembers that there is an animal known as the ‘reasonable expectation.’ For example, fidelity in a relationship or marriage. Reasonable expectations are all around us – but they are quickly being deleted from the American culture.

America regularly witnesses the exporting of the USA critical economic infrastructure. America’s sovereignty is being dissolved faster than Americans can detect the unmistakable pattern. Whatever ‘forces’ may be in operation, Americans are facing lower-paying jobs – if any. Political discussions of job ‘numbers’ evade any discussion of job ‘quality.’ The ‘normal’ job benefits are more routinely being subsidized by the employee – if any benefits are even provided.

The sovereignty of America is discounted, versus a strange and methodical imposition of an American “global responsibility,” which routinely excludes the welfare of Americans!

Thus, one of the apparent rules of the ‘system’ is, “…destroy all expectations; reasonable or otherwise.”

One of the deadliest of these efforts was the overturn of the American “Equal Protection” clause in the U.S. Constitution. In the Michigan college reverse discrimination case, the ruling hinged on a “compelling interest” in removing the equal-protection provision as the issue pertains to reverse discrimination in school admissions.

What America didn’t notice was the ‘style’ of the language; and what that language is destined to mean. Specifically, that phrase “compelling interest,” is destined to be applied to the selective enforcement of all American laws. That “selective enforcement” has been a relative norm for quite a while in American society. Now, however, there is essentially a Supreme Court precedent to anchor the debate for the “compelling interest” in enforcing the law only as “Politically Convenient.”

In essence, “social obligation” will be openly transferred to political “obligation,” in the controlled style of “political creep.”

disinformationists use sparkling generalities and name-calling symbols, they are attempting to impress their targeted audience with vivid, emotionally stimulating words. In certain situations, however, the disinformationist attempts to pacify the audience in order to make an unpleasant reality more palatable. This is accomplished by using words that are bland and euphemistic. The brutal is converted into the ‘kinder and gentler.’

For example, America changed the name of the War Department to the Department of Defense. “Queer” became “gay.” During war-time, civilian casualties are referred to as “collateral damage,” and the word “liquidation” is used as a synonym for “murder.” “Suspect” became “person of interest.” The U.S. Constitution was almost destroyed by the “Patriot Act.”

From the Vietnam War, “combat fatigue,” or “shell shock” became “post-traumatic stress disorder;” the descriptor being completely disconnected from the reality of war. The “suicide bomber” became the “homicide bomber.”

The “Muslims” (connected to Osama bin Laden) of the American/NATO Balkan campaign became “Ethnic Albanians.”

Back to Contents


The psychological mechanism of “Transfer” is used by the
disinformationist to boost an authority, sanction, and prestige of something we respect and revere to something he would have us accept.

For example, most people respect and revere their church and the nation. If the disinformationist succeeds in getting ‘church’ or ‘nation’ to approve a campaign in behalf of some program, he thereby transfers its authority, sanction, and prestige to that program. Thus, we may unwittingly accept something which otherwise we might reject.

The transfer device typically uses symbols for its best effect. The cross represents the Christian Church. The flag alludes to the nation. Cartoons depicting “Uncle Sam” allude to U.S. nationalism and an implied consensus of public opinion. Those symbols reliably stimulate emotions. (Don’t forget that concept.) The visual contact/association with such symbols will INSTANTLY arouse an entire menu of feelings we have with respect to community, church or nation.

A cartoon showing “Uncle Sam” as approving or disapproving something is powerful. Thus, the ‘Transfer’ device can be readily used both for and against the target causes and ideas. The key for the casual observer is in distinguishing the intent.

“Transfer” can be effected with deeds. When a political activist closes a speech with a public prayer, the attempt is to transfer religious prestige to the ideas being advocated – and the person/entity. As with all propaganda devices, the use of this technique is not limited to one side of the political spectrum. Pacifists can pray for peace, as quickly as a chaplain can pray for victory.

Authority can be “transferred” (or taken away). The disinformationist may attempt to transfer the reputation of “Science” or “Medicine” to a particular project or set of beliefs. A slogan for a popular cold medication serves to encourage the target audiences to “Applaud the miracles of medicine.” Most have seen many TV commercials, with an actor dressed in a white lab coat tell us that “Brand-X is the most powerful pain reliever which can be bought without a prescription.” In both of these examples, the transfer technique is being employed.

In the negative arena, the association of a Washington Post writer being a recipient of a Pulitzer Prize might be attacked by citing the faked story about the drug addicted child.

Transfer techniques can also take a nefarious/evil turn. A major engineering group prepared the Oklahoma City bombing report; using blatantly flawed data – yet, it sold! In history, the propaganda of 1939 Nazi Germany rationalized racist policies by appealing to anthropology, history, sociology and religion.

With a controlled ‘spin,’ even religion and science can be prostituted in almost any issue. The observer should be aware that any idea or program should not be accepted or rejected simply because it has been linked to a symbol such as Justice, Medicine, Science, Democracy, or Christianity.

When the observer is confronted with the “transfer device,” it is appropriate to ask the following questions:

  • What is the apparent – or not so apparent – intent/goal of the speaker?

  • What is the intended message which the disinformationist is seeking to ‘transfer’ the authority, sanction, and prestige?

  • Is there any legitimate association between the message of the disinformationist and the revered thing, person or institution?

  • Independent of the “transfer mechanism,” what are the merits of the message, when viewed alone?

Dissociation is the reverse of “Transfer,” usually serving to produce a “Plausible Innocence.” This technique is closely associated with Name Calling/Labeling.

Quoting someone who is reasonably assumed to be honest serves to effect the excuse – or a ‘safe’ distance,

“Hell, I didn’t know he was lying; why would ANYBODY suspect that?”

Displacing an arena allows the illusion of truth, via a shift in focus. To say that U.S. forces didn’t do something, serves to distance the Pentagon from condemnation.

The close association of U.S. forces to those who did the actual act (a guerilla group, for example) operates as a ‘breakout’ device.

“Nobody would have suspected that rebel bunch would do such a thing?”

The guerilla unit is referred to as a “cutout.” Often the “breakout” [action] effort is cleverly programmed; the Delta Force, for example. No matter what they do, their involvement is always protected under the flag of “National Secrecy.” Their involvement also serves as a peripheral insulation. To hold a secondary group responsible might “compromise” Delta Force – a “national security interest.”

Another tactic is to use disassociation to discredit a group or person,

“He/they are not qualified to say…”

“He/they have a reputation for being dishonest.”

“He/they are liars” “He/they are ridiculous/absurd.”

It is often enough seen that events, information or statements are methodically taken out of context. Often, context is presented with strategic information missing.

Early in the accident investigation of the Egypt Air 990 crash, a set of translators insisted that the copilot began his religious chant with the statement, “I’ve made my decision!” Yet, the ‘official’ account leaves that statement out. In the end, the report ‘diplomatically’ reads that mechanical failure could not be cited as the cause of the crash. The copilot was not cited as having committed suicide-murder. While all indications pointed to a suicide-murder, the FBI insisted that there was no criminal ‘element’ warranting their taking over the investigation.

The ‘official’ omission misled the public – to say the least.

Often, information or statements are methodically taken out of context. When citing regulations, for example, supporting information can often be quoted as though the particular statement is totally governing. In the FAA regulations, for example, there is a regulation prohibiting a pilot from leaving the flight deck for arbitrary reasons. Such events as a bathroom break or attending to an emergency are excepted.

However, by leaving out the stated exceptions, a captain couldn’t legally leave the cockpit – for any reason.

Absurd? It’s happened!

The FAA took the supporting language out of context, and successfully processed a violation – committing a felony, in the process!

Back to Contents



The alleged assassin of Bobby Kennedy plead guilty – now serving a life sentence.

The world bought off on the idea that Sirhan killed Bobby Kennedy. However, the autopsy demonstrated that Sirhan didn’t hit Bobby with a single round! The fatal bullets came from an alternate direction and range. The media recordings identified five more shots than Sirhan’s weapon was capable of firing.

Yet, what does the world believe???

Panic, confusion & chaos are opportunity environments for those who have the capacity to know – or estimate – the limits of the presented ‘threat.’ Survival and security become the first-up priorities, versus ‘facts.’

These scenarios also allow those in power to manufacture a reality, as the populace will normally grant leaders total ‘trust;’ even blind trust, hoping to receive survival and safety in return.

The world has rarely seen such panic and chaos as the events following 9-11.

The damage was factual – but the deaths were distorted out of proportion. Despite early and relatively accurate data, the actual number of deaths at the World Trade Center was kept hidden for months. The original figures being kept incredibly high – until after the Afghan invasion was well under way. During the ‘assumed fatalities’ period, several national charities received huge sums of money. Amidst that ‘chaos,’ it took an investigative reporter to reveal that the greater percentage of the charity money was being kept by the charities, versus being distributed to the intended victims.

In the shadows of the 9-11, the pre-written “Patriot Act” was scammed into law. Americans never dreamed that the ‘law’ would usurp the U.S. Constitution. Amazingly, most Americans related 9-11 to Pearl Harbor, without questioning the possibility of a similar internal government facilitation – which was factual. More amazingly, the early ‘official’ claims of “no warnings” were quickly debunked.

Even then, most America didn’t ask the obvious questions.

“Assumption” is a major element in the world of PSYOPS. The application of ‘Assumption’ is reliably operated from the “conditioning” of the targeted audience. One assumes that the President would never do anything wrong. It is assumed that the justice system works; after all, didn’t Clinton nearly get impeached?

Yet, the post 9-11 events are filled with Bush’s violations of his Federal Oath of Office,

“…to uphold and support the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Yet, he quickly signed the infamous “Patriot Act,” which removed America’s entitlement to the key elements in the Bill of Rights. With his knowledge and consent, at least two “suspects” rotted in a military prison, because there was no ‘evidence’ to charge them in a federal court. They were denied legal council, despite court orders.

They were interrogated relentlessly, under the guise of ‘national security.’

In the Iraq invasion, the assumption was that the USA would NEVER do something terribly immoral; let alone commit a war crime. Wrong, wrong, wrong! The invasion was a war crime, by itself. After the ‘formal’ combat was finished and Iraq had no army, the Hussein brothers were killed in a combat operation. There was no arrest attempt, they were just killed. Possibly, they deserved to die at the hands of a court; they didn’t deserve to be murdered in a U.S. military attack.


Because of the international agreements which the U.S. is a signatory to; however unpopular the idea ma be.

Yet, ‘Assumption’ worked for the ‘system’ – beautifully!

Too much of America’s history is fraught with false information. Thus, except for natural disasters, one should quickly ask:

  • Is there something which just doesn’t look right?

  • Is there a conflict between what’s seen and heard, versus the ‘official’ account?

  • Is there room for legitimate confusion in the information presented?

  • What might be missing in the presented ‘picture?’

  • What is the intent/goal of the ‘official’ account?

  • Do the observed actions support the ‘official’ account?

  • Could the reverse be more factual?

  • What is the intended message?

  • Who is delivering the ‘official’ account?

  • Is there any ‘salesmanship’ being witnessed, versus honest information?

  • Is there any more information obviously needed?

  • Independent of the ‘official’ account, what are the merits of the event(s), when viewed without the ‘official’ narrative?

  • Are the opposing viewpoints more reliable?

It’s unusual for the U.S. to uniquely conduct a military invasion, versus being part of a U.N. effort.

Given the horror of 9-11 (as presented) America was ready to take on the world – single-handedly. In hindsight, we discover many fallacies associated with 9-11, leading to the question,

“Was 9-11 an inside-job?”

The issues don’t end with the consideration of a simple possible mistake, made in the proverbial heat of battle. Given the facts – as they were known at the time – there was no legitimate provocation for war.

Although it appeared that there was a ‘time’ pressure, few looked past the end of their noses at such documents as the U.N. Charter, the Geneva Accords and the Nuremberg Charter. If they had, it would have been discovered that the Afghan and Iraq invasions constituted war crimes. In the assumption that America was totally above committing a war crime, few Americans ever looked at the pertinent documents – not even the military!

In the ‘convenient’ void of ignorance, Americans didn’t relate to the meaning of the opium fields of Afghanistan being re-planted (following the Taliban destruction of those fields). The replanting of those fields meant cheaper heroin being supplied to European and American drug dealers!

Assuming integrity in the White House, Americans couldn’t grasp the significance of the U.S. interests militarily seizing control of Iraq’s oil production. Few Americans have even heard of Zbigniew Brezenski’s book, “The Grand Chessboard.”

The book essentially lays out the American control/takeover of the Middle-East, in the spirit of “America’s Manifest Destiny.” Fewer Americans connect the “Corporate America,” versus the “American Government.”

Imagine the U.S. Military doing the dirty work for Unocal, Chevron, et al! They did it!

Few Americans know of Bush’s Presidential Executive Order No. 13303. That Order laid claim to Iraq’s oil production. Iraq could not even decide who could buy their oil! For all intents & purposes, Iraq became an American corporate colony.

Yet Americans believed that ‘democracy’ was the intent of the continued American military presence in Iraq!

While post 9-11 “Homeland Security” seemed to take on a mandatory mission, few Americans caught the political sleight-of-hand which substituted the content of the “Homeland Security Act,” at the last minute. The result was billions of dollars in “pork.” Amidst the ‘reliable ignorance,’ the tax-dollar rip off missions successfully flew.

Given the routine and convenient omissions in the American mass media, it’s clearly wise to ask:

  • Is the public up-to-speed with the pertinent issues?

  • Is there a credible outraged claim of ulterior motives?

  • If so, what are the details?

  • Does any one group have a monetary motive for lying?

  • Is there a sense that something is seriously wrong in the presented ‘picture?’

  • What is the stated intent/goal in the ‘official’ account?

  • Could there be a pre-existing secret agenda?

  • What is the intended message?

  • Who is conveying the ‘official’ account?

  • Independent of the ‘official’ account, what are the merits of the event(s), when viewed without the ‘official’ narrative (spin)?

The well-documented history of political events in America display a clear nefarious intent from the nation’s leaders; dating to at least Bill Clinton’s election. During the Clinton terms in office, a host of anti-terror laws were written; tailored to 9-11, including the “
Patriot Act.”

Likewise, the military “Project for a New American Century” was developed. BUT, not by a military group!

Among other matters, the PNAC – as it’s called – cites America’s global military “Constabulary Duties.” Holding North Korea at bay is one thing, but playing “Globo-Cop” is another! Post 9-11 was pre-planned in the shadows of the Clinton years!

Amazingly, America seems to be oblivious to another effort; the implementation of the Gestapo-style “Model Emergency Health Powers Acts;” alternately called the “Model State Emergency Powers Acts.” (MSEHPA) The “model” is a generic statute, intended to be enacted by the individual states. As “suggested,” the individual state health personnel could ultimately wind up under the control of the federal government; expected to act as an extended police force.

Their ‘emergency powers’ would be Gestapo in nature, including the power to arrest people who refuse to take prescribed “immunizations,” or carting them off to “Quarantine Camps.” The associated civil rights would not be worth talking about.

Doubts? Look to ‘Model Emergency Health Powers Act (MEHPA) Turns Governors into Dictators

For a copy of the proposed law, look to http://www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA.pdf

By June 30, 2005, the MSEHPA had been introduced in whole, or in part, by 44 states; 37 states had passed laws which include provisions from – or similar to – those in the MSEHPA. In fairness, the compliance varies, as to the extent of the MSEHPA provisions.

Any state which adopts such a ‘conforming’ law gets an immediate five-million dollar “signing bonus.” The federal subsidies increase dramatically, from there.

The questions:

  • Is this something which was methodically ‘low key,’ or possibly supposed to be nearly secret?

  • Does the presented account seem to come out of thin air?

  • Does the ‘logic’ hold up as being consistent? Did something ‘magically’ change?

  • Is there an important piece of information in-hiding?

  • Did something happen with a fortuitous timing – defying claims of ‘coincidence?’

  • Does the presented account smack of nefarious propaganda?

  • Is there any viable outraged claim of ulterior motives – including profiteering?

  • Is there ANY reasonably compelling suspicion amidst the information presented?

  • Is there a sense that something is seriously wrong in the presented ‘picture?’

  • Does the ‘official’ account meet a reasonable test of ‘integrity?’

  • Could there be a secret agenda?

  • What is the intended message – express or implied?

  • Who is ‘fronting’ the ‘official’ account?

  • Are there any people or groups protesting; and what do they have to say?

  • Independent of the ‘official’ account, what are the independent merits of the associated event(s)?

Babe Ruth is on the cereal box, promoting a breakfast cereal as part of a balanced breakfast. Britney is presented in a commercial endorsing a specific line of clothes. A church member attests to a ‘miracle.’

Such is the classic use of the “Testimonial Device” which readily comes to the minds of most, when the term ‘testimonial’ is used.

When we hear/read that,

“The New York Times said,”

“John L. Lewis said…,”

“Herbert Hoover said…,”

“The President said…,”

“My doctor said…,”

“Our minister said…”

The “Testimonials” may simply emphasize a legitimate, valid and accurate idea – a ‘fair use’ of the device. In other cases, however, the “Testimonial(s)” may represent the sugar-coating of a clever distortion, a blatant lie, a misunderstood notion; or any anti-social suggestion.

Such “Testimonials” may have the element of “association creep.” For example, when speaking to priests convicted of pedophilia, the overt expression may be, “…these God-hated priests…” when directly referring to the pedophilia issue. However, there is the risk/intent that the subconscious GENERAL association will uniquely be “…these God-hated priests.”

Thus, the discounting of priests, in general, can occur, whether by accident or design.

There is nothing inherently wrong with citing a qualified source; the testimonial technique can be used to construct a fair and well-balanced position or debate. However, it is often used in ways that are unfair and blatantly misleading.

With respect to a “Testimonial, the “Transfer” device can also be used as a “Trojan Horse,” in the case of a prominent personality duped into making a false statement. Or, conversely, such a prominent personality forced to issue a denial or distortion of an otherwise obvious fact.

Another PSYOPS application of a “Testimonial” – as a “Transfer Device” – is essentially a bank-shot. An alternate source is quoted (Testimonial) in such a fashion as to lead someone to believe that they are a uniquely qualified – or unqualified – source. The reader/viewer is misled into believing a given slant. Often, the intent of the quotation (Testimonial) is lost in an unwitting presumption of an honest debate.

For example, the American segment of the bin Laden family was factually evacuated by private aircraft, immediately following 9-11!

One person may cite the fact in a debate, while the clever disinformationist “bonds” the discussion to the same ‘revelation’ by America’s ‘favorite,’ Michael Moore. The ‘first-up’ effect tends to seal the fate of such discussions, despite the fact that the debate originator was actually quoting from the Tampa Tribune, but failed to cite the source, in the beginning.

A “Testimonial” can be centered on a seemingly authoritative document. For example, in the 9-11 affair, a Tom Kenney was quoted from a conversation with Dan Rather as implying – at least – that a FEMA rescue team arrived in New York the night before 9-11 – in preparation. In the ensuing debate, an individual polled FEMA – via the “Freedom of Information Act” (FOIA) – using an incorrect name, “Tom Kennedy.”

The FOIA response (authoritative Testimonial) came back in the essence of “No information was responsive to your request.”

The mis-spelling might have been deliberate. However, the real name was “Kenney,” not Kennedy.” The illusion (Testimonial) was that the assertion that FEMA rescue arrived the night before 9-11 was FALSE. The requested information was NOT forthcoming. The illusion of a straight-forward FOIA response served as a Testimonial, whatever the actual facts may – or may not – be.

In congressional testimony, Rudi Guiliani admitted that FEMA was already set up on Pier 92, under a conveniently timed “Operation Tripod.”

The most common misuse of the testimonial involves citing individuals – such as celebrities – who are not qualified to make judgments about a particular issue or person. In 1992, Barbara Streisand supported Bill Clinton; Arnold Schwarzenegger threw his weight behind George Bush. While both are popular performers, in their own right, there is no viable reason to think that they know what is best for America. The “Testimonial” takes advantage of the psychological device, known as “identification.”

The false testimonial is not bound by any restraints. In the Oklahoma City bombing, the FBI “expert” was caught both unqualified and in a lie, as to the explosive substance in the truck. His fate was a promotion!

Unfair testimonials are usually obvious; most people have seen through the obviously rhetorical trick at some time or another. In the experience of human nature, however, this probably happened when the testimonial was provided by a celebrity whom we did not respect. Conversely, if the testimony is provided by an admired celebrity, we are much less likely to be critical.

When encountering the obvious “Testimonial,” it is appropriate to ask:

  • What is the apparent – or not so apparent – intent/goal of the speaker?

  • Who’ or ‘what’ is actually being quoted in the testimonial?

  • Why should anyone regard this person/organization/publication as containing expert knowledge or trustworthy information on the subject in question?

  • Independent of the “Testimonial,” what does the message/idea amount to?

Honest people are vulnerable to the
disinformationist; the honest person thinks in honest terms. Honest people simply don’t expect to be given blatantly dishonest treatment, as a victim or an observer. Thus, there is the risk/probability that an honest statement can be methodically and forcibly associated with a bad source.

To cite the imagery of the burning Pentagon in the early AP picture, citing the lack of evidence of an aircraft impact can result in the claim,

“Oh, you’re obviously referring to the picture on the cover of that socialist Frenchman Theirry Meyssan – the conspiracy nut!”

The reality may be that the speaker had ONLY seen the AP photo. Still, the ‘first-up’ effect and the injected association will have a dramatic effect on the casual observer.

Even in text presentations, ‘passion’ and ‘tone of voice’ can be conveyed – and quite effectively. With that in mind, it’s academic that a passionately told lie creates the illusion of truth. Thereafter, the tactical use of language is important to observe.

An honest person rarely needs to resort to the tools used by the disinformationist. However, when passionate rhetoric is used in an obviously styled manner, suspicion – at a minimum – is in order. This is particularly true when associated with unreasonable discounting of an issue, source or personality.

Dynamic communication skills are to be admired – but not when they are utilized for a nefarious purpose. Again, the key is in distinguishing the intent of the message.

Long after the fact, the White House abruptly announced that they were dealing with faulty information, when deciding to invade Iraq. The presentation was in the spirit of,

“See, it wasn’t our fault; the information came from dishonest people, whom we were duped into believing!”

If one’s attention is fixed to that latest position (scope), the position sounds good, until one remembers (expanded scope) that – prior to the Iraq invasion – countries were lined up telling the White House that the information was false. France and Germany – in particular – trashed their diplomatic relationship with the USA, in an effort to prevent a senseless bloodbath.

Just prior to the invasion announcement, the U.N. inspection team was reporting increasing evidence that Saddam had – in fact – destroyed his prescribed weaponry; or at least transported it out of the country. “Selective trust” (limited scope) is no excuse in that picture; too many were attesting to Saddam’s actual compliance and the lack of any viable evidence of WMDs.

Yet, the White House statement would have the reader believe that there is only one side to the issue,

“See, we were lied to; it’s not our fault. It was an innocent mistake, see?”

The attempt was to “Repackage” the truth with the device of “Plausible Assertion.”

When encountering the obvious “Repackaging,” it is necessary to ask:

  • What is the intent of the statement/position? Clarification? Deceit? Excuse making?

  • How does the statement/position compare with other previous information?

  • Is this a radical perception/position change worth inquiring more deeply?

  • Is there a reliable opposing position worth comparing the statement/position to?

  • Does alternate information condemn the “Repackaging?”

Back to Contents