Volume I – Part II
Centralized Control of History, Media, & Academia
Control of Media
In his book, The Rockefeller File, free-lance journalist and bestselling author Gary Allen declared,
“Rockefeller gang’s plans for monopolistic World Government are never, but never, discussed in the machines of mass misinformation.”
By now you probably already know why you haven’t heard of the Hidden Evil, or the coming socialist dictatorship in mainstream news.
The people who are installing it control the media.
“Why don’t investigative news shows like Sixty Minutes… tackle the… Trilateralist-CFR hold on our government,” asks Perloff. “Surely such material would have sufficient audience appeal.”
“The so-called founders of such giants as The New York Times and NBC were chosen, financed and directed by Morgan, Schiff, and their allies,” wrote Allen. Regarding the beginning of the takeover of the mainstream news, Perloff says, “A prime mover in this process was J.P. Morgan – the original force behind the CFR.”
Perloff quotes Congressman Callaway’s notation in Congressional Record volume 54, dated February 9, 1917, which stated,
“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests… got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers… to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.”
The record continued,
“These 12 men… found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers… Emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers… [and] an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding… things of national and international nature considered vital to the interest of the purchasers… This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests served.”
“The CFR needs to reach the mass audience of Americans who do not belong to, or attend the meetings of, or read material distributed by, the propaganda organizations,” declared Smoot. He continued, “[The] Council on Foreign Relations leaders are aware of this need, and they have met it.”
Allen agreed, when he wrote,
“Public opinion is manufactured by the CFR’s ventriloquists in the mass media.”
Former CFR member, Admiral Chester Ward, described the CFR’s influence in the mass media, too.
“They control or own major newspapers, magazines, radio and television networks,” and “the most powerful companies in the book publishing business.”
The Associated Press, New York Times, Washington Post, and LA Times have their own wire services, which most mainstream news outlets use. According to Allen, the CFR controls these wire services.
“The CFR could not accomplish their goals without complicity of the mainstream news media which they absolutely control with an iron fist.”
He explained that,
“Occasionally they will hold a public meeting, and invite the open press (including C-SPAN), in order to give the impression that they are a harmless group engaged only in social activities.”
Allen refers to the mainstream media as “CFR’s ventriloquists,” and writes,
“At the center of Insider power, influence, and planning in the United States is the pervasive Council on Foreign Relations.”
“The CFR was created by the Rockefellers and their allies to be the focus of their drive for a ‘New World Order.'”
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
-David Rockefeller, Bilderberg Meeting, Baden-Baden Germany, 1991
Other outlets allegedly under the control of the CFR include, the National Broadcasting Corporation, Columbia Broadcasting System, Time, Fortune, Look, Newsweek, New York Post, Denver Post, Louisville Courier Journal, Minneapolis Tribune, and the Knight Papers.
Publishing houses under CFR control include, McGraw-Hill, Simon & Schuster, Harper Bros., Random House, Little Brown & Co., Macmillan Co., Viking Press, Saturday Review, Business Week, and Book of the Month Club.
The mainstream media appears to serve multiple functions. First, to distribute information that the controlling cabal wants you to believe is real news. Secondly, to assist in the cover-up of information that has leaked out through other sources. In other words, Damage Control. T
hirdly, as a weapon to assassinate the characters of those who expose the practices of the Establishment. Also, to act as a firewall to prevent information detrimental to the elite’s control from reaching the public. Finally, to continue to reinforce mainstream accounts of current and historical events.
The mainstream news essentially serves as a primary tool for social conditioning or mind-control.
“It is through the press and the media that the lie is penetrating through to the masses,” declared Professor Marrs.
The media is used as a weapon. So when you watch, read, or listen to mainstream news, ask yourself,
“what will the CFR like me to believe today?” Allen sums up the real purpose of the mainstream news, stating, “These are the Establishment’s official landscape painters whose jobs it is to make sure the public does not discover the C.F.R. and its role in creating a world socialist dictatorship.”
According to Allen, “psychology and propaganda” used in the mainstream news, were,
“developed in the West in such places as the Rockefeller financed Tavistock Institute in England.”
“The hidden persuaders from Madison Avenue, the Rand Corp. think tank or Hudson Institute, can and do manipulate public opinion.”
“The Establishment elitists,” he explains “refer to it as ‘the engineering of consent.’ That means we are made to think the manacles they are slipping on our wrists are love bracelets.”
Allen charges that the techniques developed at these Think Tanks have been used successfully by Communist states.
“Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.”
-Dr. Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister
From the descriptions that these researchers have given, an accurate analogy could be drawn from the Wizard of Oz. America and other NATO are the great and powerful Oz, which appear to be run by their respective leaders. The mainstream news is the “curtain,” which prevents us from understanding that the real controllers behind it are Think Tanks, the Fed, Wall Street, and the Tax-exempt Complex.
Another role of the mainstream news is to project the illusion of a two party system. The grass roots Democrats and Republicans have their philosophical differences.
But, says Allen,
“as you move up the party ladders these differences become less and less distinguishable until finally the ladders disappear behind the Establishment’s managed news curtain and come together at the apex under the control of the C.F.R.”
“There is no such thing at this date of the world’s history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it… The business of journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright… We are the tools of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”
-Journalist John Swinton, New York Press Club 1953
Most people pay attention to the events illuminated by these corporate-owned spotlights because they’re big, common, socially accepted, and because they’re all most people have ever known. When you start listening to independent news broadcasts, your conditioning begins to come undone, you start to connect the dots and find that events that were puzzling and seemed unrelated are part of the same picture. These independent news outlets broadcast on shortwave, and web cast. Some have past MP3 shows available for download. These shows are extremely educational.(*)
By listening to these broadcasts you can become familiar with who really runs this planet, what they’ve done, and where they’re taking you. Most of the topics discussed on these shows will never be covered on mainstream news. If you do begin to listen to these shows, you may find yourself watching mainstream news less frequently due to its high rubbish content.
You may also become temporarily upset after realizing you’ve been deceived, you’ve been misled, conned, tricked – and that most of your friends and relatives have too.
Control of History & Education
“According to some, history is basically a jumble of events: blunders, coincidences, and happenstances that have brought us to where we are today,” wrote Perloff. “However, seen in the context of globalist influence and maneuvering, history… begins to make sense, as if snapping into place upon a calculated blueprint.”
In 1915, Mr. Basil M. Manly, director of research for a congressional investigation known as the Commission on Industrial Relations, observed that control of information was being extended by, the “endowment of colleges and universities, [and] through controlling or influencing the public press,” wrote Wormser. During the Reece Committee hearings, Professor Kenneth Colegrove at Northwestern University testified, “The officers of these foundations wield a staggering sum of influence and direction upon research, education and propaganda in the United States and even in foreign countries.”
The Reece Committee concluded, “The impact of foundation money upon education has been very heavy, largely tending to promote uniformity in approach and method, tending to induce the educator to become an agent for social change and a propagandist for the development of our society in the direction of some form of collectivism. Foundations have supported text books… which are destructive of our basic governmental and social principles and highly critical of some of our cherished institutions.”
Wormser exposed the profound influence that foundations have on public education, when he stated, “Foundation giving most obviously has an enormous impact on education, on social thinking, and ultimately on political action. This influence reaches the public through the schools and academies, through publicity, and through education and other associations dedicated to public and international affairs.” He sustained, “Foundation grants have become so important a source of support that college and university presidents cannot often afford to ignore the opinions and wishes of the executives who distribute foundation largess.”
Finally, he added, “This situation permits large foundations to exercise a profound influence upon public opinion.” Senator Goldwater agreed, writing, “The intellectual influence of the academic community… is subservient to the wealth of the great tax-free foundations.”
Observing the effort by the Establishment to lie about history, former FBI Agent Dan Smoot said, “The Reece Committee investigation threw some revealing light on the historical blackout which the Council on Foreign Relations has ordered and conducted.” Smoot gave one example which included a two-volume history of World War II, written in part by William L. Langer of the CFR and funded by grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
“Foundations have supported a conscious distortion of history,” revealed the Reece Committee. The phrase “conscious distortion” is a polite way of saying blatant lie. “Twentieth-century history, as recorded in Establishment textbooks and journals, is inaccurate,” stated Professor Sutton. “The prevailing Establishment version is seen to be, not only inaccurate, but designed to hide a pervasive fabric of deceit and immoral conduct.” Professor Sutton explained that they are effective, “Not so much because of outright censorship, although that is an important element, but more because of the gullibility of the American ‘educated public.'”
Professor Marrs concludes that these historical lies are deliberately manufactured so the public will be easier to control. He charges, “The rewriting and deceitful misinterpretation of American and world history is one of the main methods used to manipulate and shape public opinion.” “The establishment of the American Historical Society was no doubt an unprecedented step in instituting this diabolical plan to rewrite the past,” he observes.
The accrediting agencies themselves may also be controlled by the Tax-exempt Foundations, as suggested by the Reece Committee. It stated that the “so-called “accrediting’ organizations… are extra-governmental, yet… [influence] education to a considerable degree. For various reasons colleges, universities, and specialized schools and departments today require ‘accreditation,’ that is, approval of one or more of these organizations which presume to set standards. Some of these accrediting organizations are supported by foundations…”
“Universities, hospitals, institutes and learned societies sometimes supply nothing but their name labels affixed to what is actually a pet project of foundation managers,” announced Wormser. According to Wormser, they pick the professors, they pick the topics, and they even pick the research staff. And they already know what the outcome is going to be. These doctors, professors, research staff, etc. are made well aware in advance that there will be a particular conclusion that they must arrive at. Not adhering to this predetermined conclusion will result in a denial of grants.
Professor Sutton agreed, writing, “Through foundations controlled by this elite, research by compliant and spineless academics, ‘conservatives’ as well as ‘liberals’ has been directed into channels useful for the objectives of the elite essentially to maintain this subversive and unconstitutional power apparatus. Through publishing houses controlled by this same financial elite unwelcome books have been squashed and useful books promoted.”
“It is understandable,” continued the professor, “that universities and research organizations, dependent on financial aid from foundations that are controlled by this same New York financial elite, would hardly want to support and to publish research on these aspects of [authentic] international politics.” Books critical of the official account of history don’t get reviewed or are not available through mainstream outlets. And according to author Perloff, historians that do not adhere to their version of history are often blacklisted.
Smoot asks, “Where will you find a college administration that will not defend the Ford Foundation against all critics – if the college has just received, or is in line to receive, a million-dollar gift from the Foundation? How far must you search to find college professors or school teachers who will not defend the Foundation which gives 25 million dollars at one time, to raise the salaries of professors or school teachers?”
In a future chapter called, The Satanic Influence, we’ll find evidence that the AHA was setup by an Establishment organization known as The Order of Skull and Bones. This organization, like its elite Think Tank counterparts, works toward the objective of a one-world socialist dictatorship under elite control. The mainstream media is used as a weapon by these groups.
Allen, observed that the Rockefellers “do not pour money into local school board races; they put their bucks into the schools that train the teachers and they finance the writing of textbooks.” He stated, “The family couldn’t care less who controls the local school board.” According to Allen, the publishing houses under CFR control also specialize in publishing school textbooks.
Speaking of the movement by the Council on Foreign Relations to use professors in their deliberate campaign to rewrite the past, author Perloff noted, “The council’s [CFR’s] steering committee moved to distinguish the roster by adding college professors… They hailed from campuses beholden to J.P. Morgan. As Dr. Quigley observed: ‘The Wall Street contacts with these professors were created originally from Morgan’s influence in handling large academic endowments.'”
This evidence suggests that mainstream schools and media are conduits for historical lies. It also suggests that they are a medium for social conditioning, also known as mind-control. Professor Sutton observed, “The existing system of education is little more than a conditioning mechanism. It has little to do with education in the true sense, and a lot to do with control of the individual. This requires suppression of individualist tenancies and a careful spoon-feeding of approved knowledge.”
Professor Marrs declared, “Few of us are aware that such techniques are being utilized against us since we’re constantly being led to believe… that we are independent, resourceful, intelligent, and fully able to make up our own minds.” Many of us have operated most of our lives on a filtered version of history. Or, in essence, lies.(**)
So, according to the results of congressional investigations and independent researchers, mainstream history is written by the financial elite. The CFR and interlocking Think Tanks have literally rewritten history using schools and publishing houses which they control by grants from their private multi-billion-dollar bank accounts (Tax-exempt Foundations).
I’m not an expert on history, but the information I’ll be presenting in future chapters will be more accurate than some mainstream accounts. Now that you understand that a financial elite does exist and that they exercise an enormous amount of control over mainstream publications, it will be easier to understand why the following events did not unfold as presented in schools and mainstream media. Although some of this information pertains directly to the U.S., it is relevant to all NATO countries, because as goes America, so goes the rest of the world.
* I would highly recommend the Republic Broadcasting Network (RBN), at www.republicbroadcasting.org, and the Genesis Communications Network (GCN), at www.gcnlive.com.
** I include myself in this category, researching information for this book has been a learning and sometimes shocking experience. And there is still much to learn.
Professor Sutton stated,
“Western textbooks on Soviet economic development omit any description of the economic and financial aid given to the 1917 Revolution and subsequent economic development by Western Firms and banks.”
“In the Bolshevik Revolution we have some of the world’s richest and most powerful men financing a movement which claims its very existence is based on the concept of stripping of their wealth,” declared Allen.
“[M]en like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Schiffs, Warburgs, Morgans, Harrimans, and Milners.”
“Jacob Schiff, the head of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., heavily bankrolled the [Communist] revolution. This was reported by White Russian General Arsine de Goulevitch in his book Czarism and the Revolution.”
“According to his grandson John,” described Allen, “Jacob Schiff… long-time associate of the Rothschilds, financed the Communist Revolution in Russia to the tune of $20 million.”
“According to a report on file with the State Department, his firm, Kuhn Loeb and Co. bankrolled the first five year plan for Stalin,” and added, “Schiff’s descendents are active in the Council on Foreign Relations today.”
Referring to the emergence of a communist dictatorship which resulted from the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, Professor Marrs wrote that they were funded by,
“Germany and America… Their repugnant campaign to purify and cleanse Mother Russia and to seek world domination resulted in… [millions of] human beings wiped out and brutally purged…”
“Brown Brothers Harriman” helped finance it with “money made possible by it and the affiliated Guaranty Trust Company.”
Professor Sutton agreed, writing,
“W. Averell Harriman was a director of Guaranty Trust Company” and “was involved in the Bolshevik Revolution.”
On February 3, 1949, the New York Journal-American stated, “Today it is estimated even by Jacob’s grandson, John Schiff, a prominent member of New York Society, that the old man sank about $20,000,000 for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia. Other New York banking firms also contributed.”
Referring to a June 15, 1933, Congressional Record, Allen wrote “Congressman Louis McFadden, chairman of the House Banking Committee, maintained in a speech to his fellow Congressman:
“The Soviet government has been given United States Treasure funds by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank and the Guaranty Trust Company and other banks in New York City…
Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg, the general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and of the State Bank of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and you will be staggered to see how much American money has been taken from the United States’ Treasury for the benefit of Russia.”
“Now our textbooks tell us that the Nazis and Soviets were bitter enemies and their systems are opposites,” observed Professor Sutton.
But in the,
“1920s, W. Averell Harriman was a prime supporter of the Soviets with finance and diplomatic assistance… [and] participated in RUSKOMBANK,” which was “the first Soviet commercial bank. Furthermore, Max May, the Vice President of Guaranty Trust, which was dominated by Harriman and Morgan, became the first Vice-President of Ruskombank.”
However, declared Professor Sutton,
“Averell Harriman, his brother Roland Harriman, and… E.S. James and Knight Woolley, through the Union Bank… were prime financial backers of Hitler.”
“How could a rational man support Soviets and Nazis at the same time?”
A curious dilemma arises when faced with the documented fact that Wall Street funded both Communists and Nazis.
First, it would seem these two forms of government are at opposite ends of the political spectrum. And that capitalists would see them as a threat to their growth.
Allen provides a possible answer, writing,
“But obviously these men have no fear of international Communism. It is only logical to assume that if they financed it, and are willing – even eager – to cooperate with it, it must be because they control it. Can there be another explanation that makes sense?”
“Remember that for over 100 years it has been a standard operating procedure of the Rockefellers and their allies to control both sides of every conflict.”
Before Winston Churchill became Prime Minister of Great Britain, he acknowledged a conscious effort of wealthy people to install a communist dictatorship in Russia.
He wrote in the February 18th, 1920 issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald, that,
“From the days of Spartacus [Adam] Weishaupt… to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bella Kuhn, Rose Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this world-wide conspiracy has been steadily growing.”
“It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century; and now at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”
After the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street ensured the communists would retain control of Russia. Professor Sutton described this effort when he wrote, “On may 1st, 1918, when the Bolsheviks controlled only a small fraction of Russia (and were to come near to losing even that fraction in the summer of 1918), the American League to Aid and Cooperate with Russia was organized in Washington, D.C to support the Bolsheviks. This was not a ‘Hands off Russia’ type of committee formed by the Communist Party U.S.A or its allies. It was a committee created by Wall Street with George P. Whalen of Vacuum Oil Company as Treasurer and Coffin and Oudin of General Electric, along with Thompson of the Federal Reserve System, Willard of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, and assorted socialists.”
“The Bolsheviks were not a visible political force at the time the Czar abdicated,” Allen wrote. “And they came to power not because of the downtrodden masses of Russia called them back, but because very powerful men in Europe and the United States sent them in. “They [Lenin and Trotsky] joined up, and, by November, though bribery, cunning, brutality and deception, they were able (not to bring the masses rallying to their cause, but) to hire enough thugs and make enough deals to impose out of the gun barrel what Lenin called ‘all power to the Soviets.'”
“Having created their colony in Russia,” said Allen, “the Rockefellers and their allies have struggled mightily ever since to keep it alive. Beginning in 1918 this clique has been engaged in transferring money and, probably more important, technical information to the Soviet Union.” Perloff agreed, writing, “Probably no name symbolized capitalism more than Rockefeller. Yet that family has for decades supplied trade and credit to Communist nations. After the Bolsheviks took power, the Rockefellers’ Standard Oil of New Jersey bought up Russian oil fields, while Standard Oil of New York built the soviets a refiner and made an arrangement to market their oil in Europe. During the 1920’s the Rockefellers’ Chase Bank helped found the American-Russian Chamber of Commerce, and was involved in financing Soviet raw material exports and selling Soviet bonds in the U.S.”
According to Senator Barry Goldwater, Chase Manhattan built a truck factory in Russia which could also be used to produce armored vehicles such as tanks and even rocket launchers. Perloff echoed, “American technology helped the Soviets construct the $5 billion Kama River truck factory… [which was] successfully converted by the Kremlin to military purposes.”
Wall Street continued to aid the Russian communists as they supplied the Vietnamese communists that Americans were fighting in Vietnam, says Allen. In the late 60s Rockefeller and other industrialists built synthetic rubber plants and an aluminum factory totaling about 250 million dollars. Professor Sutton observed, “these American capitalists were willing to finance and subsidize the Soviet Union while the Vietnam War was underway, knowing that the Soviets were supplying the other side.”
An article appeared in the New York Times on January 16, 1967, which carried the headline, Eaton Joins Rockefellers to Spur Trade with Reds. Perloff summed up the story, “The ensuing story noted that the Rockefellers were teaming up with tycoon Cyrus Eaton, Jr., who was financing for the Soviet block the construction of a $50 million aluminum plant and rubber plants valued at over $200 million.” He added, “The Chase, which maintains a branch office at 1 Karl Marx Square in Moscow, has gained notoriety for financing projects behind the Iron Curtain.”
StalinPictured left is Averill Harriman of the CFR (center) with Stalin (right) & Winston Churchill.(*) W. Averill Harriman was made U.S. Ambassador to the USSR in 1941. Allen wrote, “Sutton quotes a report by Averell Harriman to the State Department in June, 1944 as stating: ‘Stalin paid tribute to the assistance rendered by the United States to Soviet industry before and during the war.'” “It is not an exaggeration to say that the USSR was made in the USA,” observed Allen.
Referring to Professor Sutton’s book, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, he wrote, “No one has even attempted to refute Sutton’s almost excessively scholarly works. They can’t. But the misinformation machines that compose our mediacracy can ignore Sutton. And they do.” The book, added Perloff, “is based on assiduous research, including a deeper probe into State Department files.”
Professor Sutton warned,
“The synthesis sought by the Establishment is called the New World Order. Without controlled conflict this New World Order will not come about… And this is being done with the calculated, managed, use of conflict… This explains why the International bankers backed the Nazis, the Soviet Union, [and] North Korea… against the United States. The ‘conflict’… [builds] profits while pushing the world ever closer to One World Government. The process continues today.”
The evidence that these researchers present, which includes mainstream news and State Department records, suggests that Communist Russia was not only heavily funded by Wall Street, but was the actual creation of Wall Street.
The Communist Revolution was instigated by Wall Street. Wall Street continued to build Russia even as they supplied aid to a country that America was at war with. Because they created communist Russia, they must have known about the millions of people being murdered.
* Photo taken from the Shadows of Power, by James Perloff.
Pearl Harbor was Allowed to Happen
The following evidence suggests that the attack on Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen to justify the entry of America into WWII. At this point in history, the CFR had infiltrated the White House and was in control of FDR.
“The Council on Foreign Relations played a significant role in the Roosevelt administration,” declared author Perloff.
This was done through the War and Peace Studies Project, which was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. For instance, Henry Stimson was War Secretary for FDR, and George Messersmith was Secretary of State. So when you see FDR, think “CFR.”
U.S. intelligence cracked the radio code that Tokyo used to communicate with its embassies. The decoded messages, which were usually known to Washington on a daily basis, revealed that spies in Hawaii informed Tokyo of the exact locations of warships at Pearl Harbor. Washington was also aware that the attack would come on or around December 7th.
“These intercepts were routinely sent to the President and to Army Chief of Staff General George Marshall. In addition, separate warnings about the attack – with varying specificity as to its time – were transmitted to these two men by or through various officials, including Joseph Grew, our ambassador to Japan; FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover; Senator Guy Gillette… Congressman Marin Dies; Brigadier General Elliot Thorpe… Colonel F.G.L. Weijerman… and other sources.”
On December 6th, Captain Johan Ranneft of the Dutch naval attach in Washington acknowledged that U.S. naval intelligence informed him that Japanese carriers were about 400 miles northwest of Honolulu.
Apparently Ranneft informed Washington, but no alert was passed to the commanders in Hawaii. At least on hour before the attack, a Japanese submarine was sunk at the mouth of the harbor by a US Navy destroyer called the USS Ward. The captain of the USS Ward, Lieutenant William W. Outerbridge, sent a message to Admiral Kimmel. But it seems that there was some communications trouble between Outerbridge and Kimmel.
The Times (UK), wrote,
“Outerbridge sent a report of the attack to Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet.”
Outerbridge’s report to the US Navy stated that,
“Damage was seen by several members of the crew. This was a square positive hit… [and the] submarine was seen to keel over to starboard.”
The sighting of the submarine was confirmed by a minesweeper called the USS Condor. But Admiral Kimmel decided to “wait for verification of the report” before raising the alarm to the rest of the US Pacific Fleet in Pearl Harbor, they reported.
Prior to the attack, Admiral Richardson was stripped of his command of Pearl Harbor by FDR, for warning of the fleet’s vulnerability. Command of the base was given to Admiral Kimmel.
“Kimmel’s predecessor, Admiral Richardson, had been removed by FDR after protesting the President’s order to base the Pacific Fleet in Pearl Harbor, where it was quite vulnerable to attack.”
“Roosevelt and Marshall [also] stripped the island of most of its air defense shortly before the raid, and allotted it only one third of the surveillance planes need to reliably detect approaching forces.”
Japanese SubAn article in the BBC dated August 29, 2002, entitled Japanese Pearl Harbor Sub Found, stated,
“The 78-foot (24-metre) submarine could provide the first physical evidence to back US claims that it fired first against Japan in World War II and inflicted the first casualties.”
Also on August 29, 2002, the Chicago Sun-Times ran an article entitled Japanese Sub Sunk Before Attack Found in Pearl Harbor. It declared,
“Researchers said Wednesday they found a Japanese midget submarine sunk nearly two hours before the aerial attack on Pearl Harbor.”
And The Times reported,
“Daniel Martinez, a historian for the USS Arizona Memorial who has interviewed the sailors who shot at the submarine and a pilot who saw it sink, says there is now no doubt the attack took place.”
A congressional investigation known as The Roberts Commission was appointed by FDR to investigate the intelligence failure.
It consisted of a four-member team. Two were members of the CFR. Like other congressional investigations puppeteered by the CFR, it was a whitewash. According to Perloff, Supreme Court justice Owen Roberts (a globalist), headed the commission.
“Two of the other four members were in the CFR.” The commission absolved Washington of any blame and declared that the attack occurred due to “dereliction of duty” by Kimmel and Short.
“At the court-martials, attorneys for the defendants dug up some of Washington’s secrets. The Roberts verdict was overturned: Kimmel was exonerated; Short received a small reprimand; and the onus of blame was fixed squarely on Washington,” wrote Perloff.
Apparently the Roosevelt administration repressed the results of the commission for reasons of “national security.”
Below are posters symbolizing the propaganda, which was successfully used to solicit support for the involvement of the U.S. in WWII.
The Times described,
“Despite testimony from Lieutenant Outerbridge and the seamen on the Condor… [the account was] ignored by military and congressional tribunals investigating the attack on Pearl Harbor – including nine wartime commissions of inquiry – and the incident has since been omitted from historical accounts.”
“Incriminating memoranda in the files of the Navy and War department were destroyed. The court-martial findings were buried in a forty-volume government report on Pearl Harbor, and few Americans ever leaned the truth.”
Exploding ShipsOn the right we see the USS Arizona in flames, and the exploding USS Shaw below it.
Could this have been avoided? According to the BBC, the,
“attack on Pearl Harbor left 2,390 people dead, 1,178 wounded, 21 US ships heavily damaged and 323 aircraft damaged or destroyed.”
“The council on Foreign Relations has heavy responsibility for the maneuvering which thus dragged America into World War II.”
The CFR had what they needed to get us into WW II, now just a small amendment needed to be made to the constitution, so they could continue to legally fund the Nazis.
Six days after the Pearl Harbor attack, President Roosevelt amended the Trading with the Enemy Act.
“All this [funding] was done legally thanks to President Roosevelt,” wrote Marrs.
“This meant any kind of business transaction could be made legal with the approval of Roosevelt’s Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, whose father helped found the Council on Foreign Relations,” he stated.
Entire books and documentaries are available on this subject. Most people have an understanding that things may not have occurred exactly as they have been told. Many believe they have been lied to in some way. And some believe that it may have been allowed to happen in order to facilitate a global war.
The reality of the situation is much worse. But rather than make claims which would require an entire book to support, I’ll simply state that there are some very serious questions that need to be answered regarding not just 9/11, but the Okalahoma City Bombing.
To that I will add that the 9/11 Commission was chaired, vice chaired, and directed by members of the Council on Foreign Relations.
I urge anyone interested in finding out what happened to view the documentaries, 9/11: Rise of the Police State, by Alex Jones, 9/11: The Great Illusion, by George Humphrey, and Loose Change.
So, not only did the U.S. crack the Japanese code and know what day the attack would occur, they had at least a one-hour advanced warning on the day the attacks took place.
The CFR/Wall Street sacrificed over 2,000 people on December 7, 1941 for the sake of globalization. Then they used their history books to lie about it.
If they really wanted to defeat the Nazis, they would not have continued to fund them up until 1944.
* All photographs used on this page have been taken from www.honoluluadvertiser.com, www.history.navy.mil, and www.time.com
Professor Antony Sutton in his book, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Professor Antony Sutton (pictured right), author of nineteen books, provides a thoroughly documented account of the role played by Morgan, Rockefeller, General Electric Company, Standard Oil, National City Bank, Chase and Manhattan banks, Kuhn, Loeb and Company, General Motors, Ford, and other industrialists, in helping to finance the Nazis.
To prove his point, Professor Sutton provides bank statements, letters from U.S. ambassadors, mainstream media sources, Congressional Records, excerpts from Congressional Investigations, and statements from the Nuremberg trials. Wall Street’s funding of the Nazis is part of authentic history.
Professor Sutton wrote that,
“General Motors, Ford, General Electric, DuPont,” and other “U.S. companies intimately involved with the development of Nazi Germany were… controlled by the Wall Street elite,” such as “the J.P. Morgan firm, the Rockefeller Chase Bank and to a lesser extent the Warburg Manhattan bank.”
“The deal bringing Hitler into the government was cut at the home of banker Baron Kurt von Schroeder on January 4, 1933,” wrote author Marrs.
Other notable figures that are said to have appeared at this meeting include Council on Foreign Relations members John Foster Dulles, and Allen Dulles, of the New York law firm Sullivan and Cromwell, which represented the Schroeder bank.
Allen Dulles would eventually become a member the Bilderbergers and director of the CIA.
Zyklon B”Max Warburg,” stated Marrs, “a major German banker, and his brother Paul Warburg, who had been instrumental in establishing the Federal Reserve System in the United States, were directors of Interssen Gemeinschaft Farben or I.G. Farben, the giant German chemical firm that produced Zyklon B gas used in Nazi extermination camps.”
On the left we see used canisters of the Zyklon B gas found by the allies after WWII.
The gas was apparently produced with the full support of American industrialists.
“The financing for Adolph Hitler’s rise to power was handled through the Warburg-controlled Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam and later by the J. Henry Schroeder Bank with branches in Frankfurt, London and New York,” wrote Gary Allen. “Chief legal council to the J. Henry Schroeder Bank was the firm Sullivan and Cromwell whose senior partners included John Foster and Allen Dulles.”
Author James Perloff concurs, and reveals the role that the Council on Foreign Relations played in aiding the Nazis.
“In 1939, on the eve of blitzkrieg, the Rockefellers’ Standard Oil of New Jersey sold $20 million in aviation fuel to… I.G. Farben [and] even had an American subsidiary called American I.G.” Describing the CFR’s connection to the Nazis, he lists the directors of the American I.G. as “ubiquitous Paul Warburg (CFR founder), Henry A. Metz (CFR founder), and Charles E. Mitchell, who joined the CFR in 1923…”
Other U.S. companies which contributed heavily to the Nazi war machine include Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH) and Union Banking Corporation (UBC), both of New York.
Prescott Bush (grandfather of President George W. Bush) was a partner at BBH and director of UBC. UBC of New York, which was founded and chaired by E. Roland Harriman, is now confirmed to have been a Nazi front company.
In a story called, Bush-Nazi Link Confirmed, on October 10, 2003, The New Hampshire Daily Gazette announced,
“After 60 years of inattention and even denial by the U.S. media, newly-uncovered government documents in The National Archives and Library of Congress reveal that Prescott Bush… served as a business partner… for the financial architect of the Nazi war machine from 1926 until 1942.”
A similar article appeared in the London Guardian on September 25, 2004, it was entitled, How Bush’s Grandfather Helped Hitler’s Rise to Power.
“Prescott Sheldon Bush… father of the [former] President George [H. W.] Bush… was a partner in the Wall Street firm of Brown Brothers Harriman for 40 years,” wrote Professor Marrs.
“It was Brown Brothers Harriman that helped to finance… the 1917 communist revolution in Moscow and the rise of Hitler and Nazism, through money made possible by it and the affiliated Guaranty Trust Company.”
Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands who served in an intelligence unit for the German branch of Farben was also a member of the Nazi SS. Bernhard eventually became a founding member of the Bilderbergers.
Death ChamberIn his book, The Rockefeller File, Gary Allen wrote,
“The alliance between Nazi Germany and the Rockefellers is truly shocking.”
“Hitler’s Luftwaffe ran on Standard petrol, and the Rockefellers were partners in I.G. Farben Industries, whose thousands of war products included the poison gas used in Nazi death camps.”
Professor Sutton added,
“American I.G. Farben, General Electric, Standard Oil of New Jersey, Ford, and other U.S. firms” were “directly responsible for bringing the Nazis to power.”
The Russian soldier on the right is standing on top of a death chamber, near the opening from which the gas was dropped.
“German bankers on the Farben Aufsichsrat (the supervisory Board of Directors) [of I.G. Farben] in the late 1920s included the Hamburg banker Max Warburg, whose brother Paul Warburg was a founder of the Federal Reserve System in the Unite States,” revealed Professor Sutton.
“Not coincidentally, Paul Warburg was also on the board of American I.G., Farben’s wholly owned U.S. Subsidiary.”
So what this means is that Paul Warburg aided the Nazis while working for I.G. Farben in the U.S., while his brother helped them while working for the same company in Germany.
“The two largest tank producers in Hitler’s Germany were Opel, a wholly owned subsidiary of General Motors (controlled by the J.P. Morgan firm), and the Ford A.G. subsidiary of the Ford Motor Company of Detroit,” wrote Professor Sutton.
“In brief,” he affirmed, “American companies associated with the Morgan-Rockefeller international investment bankers… were intimately related to the growth of Nazi Industry.”
HollerithOn March, 29, 2002, The Guardian ran an article entitled, IBM Dealt Directly with Holocaust Organisers.
They wrote that,
“Newly discovered documents from Hitler’s Germany prove that the computer company IBM directly supplied the Nazis with technology which was used to help transport millions of people to their deaths in the concentration camps at Auschwitz and Treblinka.”
According to this mainstream publication, IBM supplied the Hollerith machines (pictured right) that determined when people would die, according to their weight, height, age, and other attributes.
Hitler & Watson Meeting
Similarly, an article entitled, How IBM Helped Automate the Nazi Death Machine in Poland, appeared in The Village Voice on March 27, 2002, alleging that there was,
“a strategic business alliance between IBM and the Reich, beginning in the first days of the Hitler regime and continuing right through World War II.”
“Recently discovered Nazi documents… make clear that IBM’s alliance with the Third Reich went far beyond its German subsidiary. A key factor in the Holocaust in Poland was IBM technology provided directly through… IBM New York, mainly to its headquarters at 590 Madison Avenue.”
Pictured above is a 1937 meeting between Adolph Hitler (left), and the head of IBM, Thomas J. Watson (center).
One excuse used by the industrialists that supported the Nazis, is that they had no idea what was going on. Unveiling this falsehood, Professor Sutton explained,
“This financial and technical assistance is referred to as ‘accidental’ or due to the ‘short-sightedness’ of American businessmen.”
However, he stated,
“the evidence presented… strongly suggests some degree of premeditation on the part of these American financiers.”
He further noted,
“The general impression left with the reader by modern historians is that this American technical assistance was accidental and that American industrialists were innocent of wrongdoings.”
The Kilgore Committee under the United States Senate charged with post World War II investigations concluded that,
“the United States accidentally played an important role in the technical arming of Germany… Germans were brought to Detroit [Ford Motor Company] to learn the techniques of specialized production of components, and of straight-line assembly… The techniques learned in Detroit were eventually used to construct the dive-bombing Stukas.”
To the right we see the German Stukas used during WWII, which were apparently designed with the help of Ford Motor Company.
Reportedly, the planes ran on fuel supplied by Rockefeller. The report continued,
“At a later period I.G. Farben representatives in this country enabled a stream of German engineers to visit not only plane plants but others of military importance, in which they learned a great deal that was eventually used against the United States.”
Professor Sutton points out,
“[The Kilgore Committee] makes it clear that I.G. Farben directors had precise knowledge of the Nazi concentration camps and the use of I.G. chemicals.”
To illustrate his point, he quotes a 1945 interrogation of I.G. Farben director von Schnitzler in which Schnitzler stated,
“I was horrified” that the chemicals were being used in the camps but “kept it to myself because it was too terrible.”
Professor Sutton suggests,
“not only was an influential sector of American business aware of the nature of Naziism, but for its own purposes aided Naziism wherever possible” and “profitable.”
“The pleas of innocence do not accord with the facts.”
James Stewart Martin investigated the structure of the Nazi industry while working as Chief of the Economic Warfare Section for the Department of Justice.
In his book, All Honorable Men, published in 1950, he asserts that American and British businessmen got themselves appointed to key positions in the post-war investigation. Martin concludes that this was a deliberate tactic to divert, stifle and muffle investigation of Nazi industrialists and to hide their own involvement.
Regarding this matter Professor Sutton observed,
“The evidence suggests there was a concerted effort not only to protect Nazi businessmen, but also to protect the collaborating elements of American and British business.”
Referring to the Kilgore Committee in 1946, Professor Sutton wrote,
“Accordingly, it is not at all difficult to visualize why Nazi industrialists were puzzled by ‘investigations’ and assumed at the end of the war that their Wall Street friends would bail them out and protect them from the wrath of those who had suffered.”
Apparently these Nazis were angry that they were even on trial and boasted that their “friends” in Wall Street would rescue them.
The Kilgore Committee in 1946 described the attitudes of these Nazi war criminals stating,
“Their general attitude and expectation was that the war was over and we ought now to be assisting them in helping to get I.G. Farben and German industry back on its feet. Some of them have outwardly said that this questioning and investigation was… of short duration, because as soon as things got a little settled they would expect their friends in the Untitled States and England to be coming over. Their friends, so they said, would put a stop to activities such as these investigations…”
The Control Council which was given the task of preparing directives for the arrest and detention of war criminals, moved into Germany after the war. It was headed by the Council on Foreign Relations.
Professor Sutton observed,
“At the end of World War II, Wall Street moved into Germany through the Control Council to protect their old cartel friends and limit the extent to which the denazification fervor would damage old business relationships.”
“General Lucius Clay, the deputy military governor for Germany, appointed… Banker William Draper [to]… put his control team together from businessmen who had represented American business in pre-war Germany.”
The CFR/Wall Street managed these investigations from the top.
“So when we examine the Control Council for Germany,” wrote Professor Sutton “we find that the head of the finance division was Louis Douglas, director of the Morgan-controlled General Motors,” and the head of the “Economics Division was William Draper, a partner in the Dillon, Read Firm that had so much to do with building Nazi Germany in the first place.”
“All three men [Douglas, Clay, and Draper] were, not surprisingly… members of the Council on Foreign Relations,” he added.
“None of the Americans were ever prosecuted,” wrote Perloff.
“The story of American ties to German fascism has been avoided like the plaque by the major U.S. media.”
Professor Sutton declared,
“After World War II the Tribunals set up to investigate Nazi war criminals were careful to censor any materials regarding Western assistance to Hitler.”
“[At] the very core of Naziism,” says Professor Sutton, we “find Wall Street, including Standard Oil of New Jersey and I.T.T., represented… [up] to as late as 1944.”
Referring to Wall Street’s role in funding the Nazis as being one part of a consolidation plan for world domination, he concludes,
“This interplay of ideas and cooperation… was only one facet of a vast and ambitious system of cooperation and international alliance for world control.”
The professor quotes an Establishment insider; Georgetown professor Dr. Carroll Quigley, as saying that it was,
“nothing less than to create a world system of financial control, in private hands, able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.”
According to this information, the Council on Foreign Relation, played an important role in funding the Nazis, and orchestrated the investigations to prevent their connections from being made public. This is a major historical lie.
This evidence also suggests that Wall Street/CFR not only funded, but arguably, created the Nazi war machine.
* All photographs used on this page have been taken from the following sources: www.Wikipedia.com, www.reformation.org, www.theage.com.au, www.mindfully.org.
The Great Depression was Deliberately Created
Apparently congress was aware of the scheme of the international bankers and recognized the danger that the republic was in.
Congressman Lindberg said in a Congressional Record dated, December 22, 1913, vol. 51,
“This new law [the Federal Reserve Act] will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation. It may not do so immediately, but… if the trusts can get another period of inflation, they figure they can unload the stocks on the people at high prices during the excitement and them bring on a panic and buy them back at low prices… The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed.”
“That day of reckoning, of course, came in 1929,” said Perloff, “and the Federal Reserve has since created an endless series of booms and busts by the strategic tightening and relaxation of money and credit.”
Speaking about the historical disinformation regarding the crash, Perloff said,
“Establishment historians present the ’29 stock market crash as they do most events: an accident, evolved from erroneous policies, not from deliberate planning. We have all heard how foolish speculation bid stock prices high, but that the bubble finally burst, plunging brokers out of windows and America into the Depression.”
“Having built the Federal Reserve as a tool to consolidate and control wealth, the international bankers were now ready to make a major killing,” stated Allen.
“Between 1923 and 1929,” he described, “the Federal Reserve expanded (inflated) the money supply by sixty-two percent. Much of this new money was used to bid the stock market up to dizzying heights. At the same time that enormous amounts of credit money were being made available.”
“the mass media began to ballyhoo tales of instant riches to be made in the stock market. According to Ferdinand Lundberg: ‘For profits to be made on these funds the public had to be induced to speculate, and it was so induced by misleading newspaper accounts, many of them bought and paid for by the brokers that operated the pools.'”
Perloff concurred, writing,
“The Federal Reserve prompted the speculation by expanding the money supply a whopping sixty-two percent between 1923 and 1929. When the central bank became law in 1913, Congressman Charles Lindbergh had warned: ‘From now on, depressions will be scientifically created.’ Like two con men working a mark, the Fed made credit easy while Establishment newspapers hyped what riches could be made in the stock market.”
“Curtis Dall,” he continued, “himself a syndicate manager for Lehman Brothers was on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on the day of the Crash.”
Perloff quotes Dall as declaring,
“Actually, it was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the World-Money powers triggered by the planned sudden shortage of call money in the New York money market.”
The “shearing,” wrote Allen, caused a,
“despair [which] produced a willingness to accept a major expansion of government controls over the economy… In 1929, America was a long way from total government.”
“The next depression will be used as the excuse for complete socialist-fascist controls at home and the creation of a World Superstate internationally.”
Congressman Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, declared of the Depression,
“It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence.”
“The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all.”
The Great Depression is another example of the Problem-Reaction-Solution formula.
“Plummeting stock prices ruined small investors, but not the top “insiders” on Wall Street,” wrote Perloff.
“Paul Warburg had issued a tip in March of 1929 that the crash was coming. Before it did, John D. Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, Joseph P. Kennedy, and other money barons got out of the market… Early withdrawal from the market not only preserved the fortunes of these men,” said Perloff, “it also enabled them to return later and buy up whole companies for a song.”
“History shows that the Wall Street biggies came through very well indeed,” wrote Alan B. Jones in his book, How the World Really Works.
Quoting from G. Edward Griffin’s book, The Creature from Jekyll Island, he added,
“Virtually all of the inner club was rescued. There is no record of any member of the interlocking directorate between the Federal Reserve, the major New York banks, and their prime customers having been caught by surprise.”
Pictured below is a bread line in New York City during the Great Depression. Apparently the Wall Street insiders didn’t require this service.(*)
Jones quotes Herbert Hoover’s description of the Secretary of the Treasury, Andrew Mellon’s views,
“Mr. Mellon had only one formula: ‘Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, [and] liquidate real estate.'” [Mellon] said, “It will purge the rottenness out of the system. Values will be adjusted, and enterprising people will pick up the wrecks from less competent people.”
“For those who knew the score,” stated Allen, “a comment by Paul Warburg had provided the warning to sell. That signal came on March 9, 1929, when the Financial Chronicle quoted Warburg as giving this sound advice: ‘If orgies of unrestricted speculation are permitted to spread too far… the ultimate collapse is certain… to bring about a general depression involving the whole country.'”
“Sharpies [insiders] were later able to buy back these stocks at a ninety percent discount from their former highs,” he declared.
“FDR is probably best remembered for the New Deal,” stated Perloff.
“Of courser, since a large portion of the work force was unemployed, there was not enough tax revenue to pay for these programs. So the government turned to its other source – borrowing. In effect, the international bankers, having created the Depression, now loaned America the cash to recover from it.”
“Naturally, the interest on these loans would be borne on the backs of taxpayers for years to come.”
The migration of families & individuals due to lack of jobs was evidently common during the Great Depression.
Encyclopedia Britannica describes the Great Depression as the,
“Longest and most severe economic depression ever experienced,” which “precipitated economic failures around the world” and triggered “major changes in the structure of the U.S. economy.”
“To think that the scientifically engineered Crash of ’29 was an accident or the result of stupidity defies all logic,” concluded Allen.
This evidence suggests that The Great Depression was artificially created so the larger Wall Street firms, which control the stock market, could eliminate competition and make profits out of lending America money to recover from it.
“Competition is a sin.”
-John D. Rockefeller
All photographs used on this page have been taken from from www.Britannica.com and www.Businessweek.com.
An Attempted Overthrow of the U.S. Government
General ButlerIn 1934 General Smedley D. Butler went public after he was approached by Wall Street and offered up to 300 million dollars to lead an army of 500,00 veterans equipped with munitions from Remington Arms Company to Washington D.C., in order to overthrow the U.S. Government by force. The plot was investigated by the McCormack-Dickstein committee, which found General Butler to be telling the truth.(*)
During his 35 years of service in the Marine Corps, General Butler received the Congressional Medal of Honor twice. The Medal of Honor is the highest award for valor against an enemy force, which can be given to an individual serving in the Armed Forces of the United States.
Jules Archer’s book, The Plot to Seize the White House, was written with the cooperation of senators, reporters, former Speaker of the House of Representatives John W. McCormack, former editors of the Philadelphia Inquirer, and the Philadelphia Record, and the immediate family of General Smedley Butler who provided military records, scrapbooks, memorabilia, recordings, etc. In his book Archer states, “School texts… are uniquely silent about the powerful Americans who plotted to seize the White House with a private army, hold President Franklin D. Roosevelt prisoner, and get rid of him if he refused to serve as their puppet in a dictatorship they planned to impose and control.”
The backing of the revolution reportedly came from the American Liberty League, which was headed by Morgan and DuPont. “Heavy contributors,” says Archer, also included, “the Pitcairn family (Pittsburgh Plate Glass), Andrew W. Mellon Associates, Rockefeller Associates, E. F. Hutton Associates, William S. Knudsen (General Motors), and the Pew family (Sun Oil Associates).” The online encyclopedia, Wikipedia, added, “General Butler claimed that the American Liberty League was the primary means of funding the plot. The main backers were the DuPont family, as well as leaders of U.S. Steel, General Motors, Standard Oil, Chase National Bank, and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company.”
In his book, Facts and Fascism, investigative reporter, and author George Seldes wrote, “Most papers suppressed the whole story or threw it down by ridiculing it. Nor did the press later publish the McCormack-Dickstein report which stated that every charge Butler made… had been proven true.” Archer commented, “Press coverage of what was obviously a startling story of utmost importance to the security of the nation was largely one of distortion, suppression, and omission.”
So, as expected, the mainstream press was called upon to discredit General Butler. “On November 22 the Associated Press struck a low blow at Butler by getting Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia, of New York, to express an opinion of the conspiracy based on what he had read about it in the press,” wrote Archer. The AP ran this news item under the headline Cocktail Putsch. Explaining the contents of the article, Archer continued, “Mayor LaGuardia of New York laughingly described today the charges of General Smedley D. Butler that New York brokers suggested he lead an army of 500,000 ex-service men on Washington as ‘a cocktail putsch.’ The Mayor indicated he believed that some one at a party had suggested the idea to the ex-marine as a joke.”
Commenting on a November 21, 1934, article on the front page of the New York Times entitled, Gen. Butler Bares Fascist Plot To Seize Government by Force, Archer wrote, “This was followed by a whole string of denials, or ridicule of the charges, by prominent people implicated. Extensive space was given to their attempts to brand Butler a liar or lunatic. Only at the tail of the story, buried inside the paper, did the Times wind up its account with a few brief paragraphs mentioning some of his allegations.”
Continuing to quote denials from the article, he wrote, “It’s a joke – a publicity stunt.” “Thomas W. Lamont, partner in J. P. Morgan and Company, gave his comment: ‘Perfect moonshine! Too unutterably ridiculous to comment upon!’ J. P. Morgan himself, just back from Europe, had nothing to say. ‘A fantasy!’ scoffed Colonel Grayson M.-P. Murphy. ‘I can’t imagine how anyone could produce it or any sane person believe it. It is absolutely false so far as it relates to me and my firm.'” Time Magazine also ran a first-page story on December 3, 1934 that attempted to ridicule Butler under the headline Plot Without Plotters.
“If the press seemed overeager to emphasize denials of Butler’s charges,” wrote Archer, “the people of grass-roots America were far readier to believe the man who had exposed the plot. Letters of encouragement poured in from all over the country.” Fortunately not all mainstream publications demonized General Butler. “Paul Comly French broke the story [on November 20, 1934] in… the Philadelphia Record and the New York Post,” announced Archer.
Archer described French’s article entitled, $3,000,000 Bid for Fascist Army Bared, writing, “Major General Smedley D. Butler revealed today that he has been asked by a group of wealthy New York brokers to lead a Fascist movement to set up a dictatorship in the United States. General Butler, ranking major general of the Marine Corps up to his retirement three years ago, told his story today at a secret session of the Congressional Committee on Un-American Activities.”
Quoting Dickstein, Archer wrote, “General Butler’s charges were too serious to be dropped without further investigation… He is a man of unquestioned sincerity and integrity. Furthermore, in my opinion, his statements were not denied or refuted. I think the matter should be gone into thoroughly and completely and I intend asking Congress for funds to make such an investigation. The country should know the full truth about these reputed overtures to General Butler. If there are individuals or interests who have ideas and plans such as he testified to, they should be dragged out into the open.”
Unfortunately this was not the case. The committee, like all committees investigating the financial elite, was a whitewash. Wikipedia states that even though the committee, “did take the threat seriously and did verify that a fascist coup was indeed well past the planning stage, the Senate committee expired.” This is similar to the Reece Committee’s fate while investigating the Tax-exempt Foundations.
“Worst of all, no one involved in the plot had been prosecuted,” wrote Archer. “MacGuire had denied essential parts of Butler’s testimony, which the committee itself reported it had proved by documents, bank records, and letters,” he declared. This is blatant perjury. So, he asked, “Did the department intend to file a criminal prosecution against MacGuire for perjury or involvement in the plot?” The answer of course is no.
The online encyclopedia noted, “Portions of Butler’s story were corroborated,” by “Veterans of Foreign Wars commander James E. Van Zandt,” who attested that he too, had been approached by representatives of Wall Street to lead a “Fascist dictatorship” under the guise of a “Veterans Organization.” General Butler’s testimony was also supported by Captain Samuel Glazier – testifying under oath about a plot to install a dictatorship in the United States.
Of the committee’s findings, the encyclopedia, states, “The Congressional Committee report confirmed Butler’s testimony… In the last few weeks of the committee’s official life it received evidence showing that certain persons had made an attempt to establish a fascist government in this country.” It added, “There is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient.”
The director of the ACLU, Roger Baldwin, stated, “The Congressional Committee investigating un-American activities has just reported that the Fascist plot to seize the government… was proved; yet not a single participant will be prosecuted under the perfectly plain language of the federal conspiracy act making this a high crime.”
Reportedly, on February 25, 1935 Time Magazine ran an article entitled, Schnozzle, gimlet eye: Fascist to Fascist which stated that the HUAC found the plot to be true. Commenting on this, Archer stated, “In a tiny footnote at the bottom of the page, in five-point type that could barely be read, Time informed those of its readers with 20-20 vision, ‘Also last week the House Committee on Un-American Activities purported to report that a two-month investigation had convinced it that General Butler’s story of a Fascist march on Washington was alarmingly true.'”
In his broadcast over WCAU on February 17, 1935, Butler revealed that some of the most important portions of his testimony had been suppressed in the McCormack-Dickstein report to Congress. He said the committee had, “stopped dead in its tracks when it got near the top.” “There is strong evidence to suggest that the conspirators may have been too important politically, socially, and economically to be brought to justice after their scheme had been exposed before the McCormack-Dickstein Committee of the House of Representatives,” wrote Archer. He stated, “Powerful influences had obviously been brought to bear to cut short the hearings, stop subpoenas from being issued to all the important figures involved, and end the life of the committee.”
Archer quotes retired Representative John W. McCormack, former Speaker of the House as saying, “There was no doubt that General Butler was telling the truth… We believed his testimony one hundred percent. He was a great, patriotic American in every respect.” According McCormack, if General Butler had not exposed these plotters, Americans today could be living under a dictatorship.
When McCormack was asked by Archer why the Department of justice under Attorney General Homer Cummings failed to initiate criminal proceedings against the plotters. He answered, “The way I figure it… we did our job in the committee by exposing the plot, and then it was up to the Department of Justice to do their job – to take it from there.”
Not surprisingly, the alleged financial backing of this attempted overthrow includes a solid link to the CFR. “The founding president of the CFR was John W. Davis,” wrote Perloff, “who was J.P. Morgan’s personal attorney and a millionaire in his own right.” In addition, Thomas W. Lamont was a founding member of the CFR. He also aided in the bloody Bolshevik Revolution. Perloff added, “Among the other Bolshevik abettors in the CFR’s original membership were… Morgan partner Thomas Lamont who helped persuade the British government to accept the New Soviet regime…” John J. Raskob, a director of the Liberty League, was also an early CFR member.
John L. Spivak, a reporter assigned to cover the committee hearings, called the story “one of the most fantastic plots in American history… What was behind the plot,” said Spivak “was shrouded in a silence which has not been broken to this day… It would be regrettable if historians neglected this episode and future generations of Americans never learned of it.”
Archer echoed, “It would seem time that school textbooks in America were revised to acknowledge our debt to the almost forgotten hero who thwarted the conspiracy to end democratic government in America.”
According to this information, the CFR/Wall Street made an overt attempt to install a dictatorship by force. This plot was investigated by congress and found to be authentic. It is strikingly similar to the Communist Revolution which Wall Street is known to have funded, where an entire country was communized after a few major cities were seized.
“The Communists came to power by seizing a mere handful of key cities,” wrote Allen. “In fact, practically the whole Bolshevik Revolution took place in one city – Petrograd. It was as if the whole United States became Communist because a communist-led mob seized Washington D.C.”
* Photo taken from wikipedia.com.
The historical evidence you’ve just seen contains not just a couple of irrelevant details, that have for clarity sake been omitted, but major facts that have been deliberately left out of mainstream education.
These facts would cause most people to view this world in a very different manner. Major historical lies have been widely distributed through the school system and mainstream publications.
The lies have been relatively consistent, spanning multiple major historical events.
We’ve seen a pattern of the same financial elite (often the same families), lying, scheming, and instigating conflicts for their own profit and control. The media is their tool, used to attack their enemies, whitewash authentic history and keep people ignorant.
The controlling elite funded the savage Communist Revolution and the Nazi Holocaust, which resulted in the murder of millions.
They built the dictatorship in Russia, which resulted in the brutal slaughter of millions of people during the Russian Holocaust. The same cabal allowed the attacks on Pearl Harbor to take place and deliberately created the Great Depression.
There was at least one blatant attempt to overthrow the U.S. Government by force in 1933-34, which congress confirmed to be genuine. Entire volumes could probably be written on their evil deeds.
By control of the Tax-exempt Complex and other institutions, they control academia and have literally rewritten history.