Text
by Mark M. Rich
2009
from TheHiddenEvil Website
Overview
Throughout this book I will be presenting evidence on what I’ve discovered to be highly organized, covert, psychological warfare campaigns being carried out on the civilian population in all NATO countries.
Upon researching this phenomenon, I found that it led to elite organizations that have instigated wars, manipulated major historical events, and have wreaked havoc on a population that is largely unaware of their existence. After reading this book you may draw your own conclusions.
I will be explaining something that resembles insanity, but isn’t insanity, yet is caused by those who are insane. This will become evident later. The information in this book will be uncomfortable to most people. Some of it will be scary. I do not present the information for the purpose of scaring you, but it is a peripheral result of explaining something this repulsive in detail. It appears that the more areas of a horrific phenomenon you attempt to illuminate, the more you discover how horrifying it really is.
There are multiple websites now devoted to this topic which are listed in the Resources section of this book. Some independent talk shows such as The Grassy Knoll, The Power Hour, The Investigative Journal, and a few others, have covered this topic. But it is not yet recognized by the mainstream media, the legal community, or mental health professionals, for reasons which I will explain.
Some of the people I’ll be referencing have been labeled conspiracy nuts by the mainstream media in order to be discredited.(*) Interestingly, I’ve found that some of those engaged in the paranormal are partially responsible for the creation of this program. So, as I’ll demonstrate, the financial elite recruit the services of these individuals when required, but attack them when they expose their operations. These are standard discrediting tactics. This will be explored in the Tactics and Techniques to Discredit chapters.
Each person or organization used as a source may not necessarily agree with my overall estimation of this, or with other sources listed. They are used to illustrate specific points. If you’re on the receiving end of this policy, or even if you’re not targeted but have researched it, you may not completely agree with my findings. I’m just presenting the information that I’ve compiled. I don’t propose to have the absolute truth regarding this phenomenon, but my aim is to obtain it.
There are people who will have a vested interest in discrediting me or the information in this book. I’ve taken much caution to minimize the amount of informational errors that it contains. But most books contain some errors.(**) I have taken little liberty when making certain points that I believe are pertinent by doing my best to document this phenomenon as much as possible.
But, as much as I’ve done my best to do this, the media, and “experts,” may find something wrong with it and begin a relentless campaign to discredit me. Some words or phrases may be twisted around and quoted out of context. Small irrelevant inconsistencies may be blown out of proportion. There may also be a pervasive effort by multiple respectable “victims” to discredit me, or this information. As I’ll demonstrate, these are predictable tactics. But keep this in mind–after absorbing the information, ask yourself; does it ring true to you?
I will be referencing the work of doctors, former federal law enforcement, politicians, and researchers. Some of these individuals have seen how this planet really works due to their experience on the front lines. This experience has given them a glimpse of matters that will eventually affect everyone. They have issued warnings to the public in their books and publications. But apparently too many are asleep.
During this presentation you’ll see evidence from both the political Left and the Right. Because there are often barricades which prevent people who have adopted a political side from receiving information, I ask that you briefly abandon any identification with a political party. This is necessary for two reasons. First, mainstream conservative and liberal news sources both occasionally publish useful information. Second, as I’ll demonstrate, both political parties are controlled by the same source. The left/right political spectrum is a control mechanism.
Acknowledging this trap in his book, America’s Secret Establishment, Professor Antony C. Sutton stated, “Above all the reader must-at least temporarily while reading this work-put to one side the descriptive clich s of the left and right, liberal and conservative, communist and fascist, even republican and democrat. These terms may be important for self-recognition, they do provide a certain reassurance, but they are confusing in our context unless seen as essential elements in a game plan.”
The first part of this volume (Volume I), explains how the Hidden Evil can be allowed to exist in our society. This volume will cover the controlling financial elite, who they are, what they’ve done, and what their plans are. It will provide evidence to support my premise that, unknown to the masses, elite groups control their governments.
The second part of Volume I is an overview of historical events that have been kept from mainstream publications. It provides an outline which explains how the Hidden Evil is part of a recurring historical pattern. It also explains how these elite groups control the media, schools, and have rewritten history. Furthermore, it documents their financial support for Russian and German dictatorships, as well as a string of lies they’ve used to cover their tracks.
Volume II will focus on the structure, tactics, and purpose for the Hidden Evil, as well as how people can be persuaded to serve it. Also in Volume II, we’ll explore the high probability that it was created by these elite organizations. I’ll also cover the subject of Satanism which has surfaced many times during my research, and manifests itself on multiple levels within this program. But, it is not necessary to believe in Satan, Christ, or any religion in order to recognize that the Hidden Evil exists.
This book is not a complete coverage of the Global Union (New World Order), or of the global financial elite. Neither is it an in-depth coverage of history, or Non-lethal Weapons (NLW), also called Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). But it’s necessary that these subjects are touched upon to show a pattern which suggests that the Hidden Evil is a foundational element for the maintenance of a dictatorship, and was created by people who have funded dictatorships in the past.
Why would I want to focus on such a dark area of humanity? There is the argument by some mystics or New Agers that much of reality is an illusion. They insist that perception is reality, and if you choose to change your interpretation of an event, then it will have whatever meaning you assign to it. I think that is the case. Many things can be changed by choosing a different belief system.
But I also think there are principles and circumstances which exist no matter what. They exist regardless of our beliefs or knowledge of their existence.
The Hidden Evil is one of them.
Footnotes
* Dr. Rauni Leena Kilde, who has written about this phenomenon, has been labeled a conspiracy nut (wikipedia.com), for believing that there may be intelligent life in the universe besides human beings.
** This book will contain grammatical & spelling errors. Some of them are my responsibility. In addition, the manuscript for this book has undergone frequent sabotage. This occurred from the time I began writing it, up until (and including) the time it was uploaded to the publisher’s server.
Volume I – Part I
Introduction to the Financial Elite
Before covering the specific groups which are likely responsible for creating the Hidden Evil, it’s necessary to explain that the United States and other NATO countries are not run by their respective leaders.
The power structure does not operate in the manner taught in public schools. The evidence I’ll be presenting suggests that these nations are run by an elite cabal of wealthy individuals who prefer to operate from behind the scenes.
This group has been called the Establishment, the Secret Brotherhood, the Alliance, the Invisible Government, the Shadow Government, a legal mafia, the New World Order, the Illuminati, the Insiders, the Military-industrial Complex, etc.(*)
In an article entitled, Elite Clique Holds Power in the U.S., which appeared in the Indianapolis News on December 23, 1961, Edith Kermit Roosevelt wrote,
“The word ‘Establishment’ is a general term for the power elite in international finance, business, the professions and government, largely from the northeast, who wield most of the power regardless of who is in the White House. Most people are unaware of the existence of this ‘legitimate Mafia.'”
She described,
“The power of the Establishment makes itself felt from the professor who seeks a foundation grant, to the candidate for a cabinet post or State Department job. It affects the nation’s policies in almost every area.”
Most people can sense that something is wrong, but can’t quite put their finger on what it is.
Despite changes in administration every four years, the planet continues to fall apart. Professor Sutton stated in his book, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler,
“Wars are started (and stopped) with no shred of coherent explanation. Political words have never matched political deeds.”
The reason, he asserted, is,
“because the center of political power has been elsewhere than with elected and presumably responsive representatives in Washington, and this power elite has its own objectives, which are inconsistent with those of the public at large.”
On March 26, 1922, the Mayor of New York City, John F. Hylan said,
“The real menace of our republic is the invisible government which, like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimly length over our city, state and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses generally referred to as ‘international bankers.’ This little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run our government for their own selfish ends.”
Congressman Lawrence P. McDonald wrote in November of 1975,
“Money alone is not enough to quench the thirst and lusts of the super-rich. Instead, many of them use their vast wealth, and the influence such riches give them, to achieve even more power. Power of a magnitude never dreamed of by the tyrants and despots of earlier ages. Power on a worldwide scale. Power over people, not just products.”
In his book Dark Majesty, Professor Texe Marrs added,
“The men at the top of the empire are billionaires many times over. Yet they still want more money.”
Author James Perloff describes the typical path of one of these individuals, in his book, The Shadows of Power. He writes that it “begins in private schools, the most famous being Groton.
From these they have typically proceeded to Harvard, Yale, Princeton, or Columbia, there entering exclusive fraternities, such as Yale’s secretive Skull and Bones… From academia they have customarily progressed to Wall Street, perhaps joining an international investment bank, such as Chase Manhattan, or a prominent law firm or brokerage house.”
He continues,
“Some of the politically inclined have signed on with the establishment think tanks like the Brookings Institution and the Rand Corporation,” and “a few have found themselves on the boards of vast foundations.”
From there, states Perloff, they ascend into,
“high positions in the federal government,” which requires membership in a “New York-based group called the Council on Foreign Relations.”
Professor Marrs declared,
“Five major groups-Banking and Money, Political, Intelligence, Religious, and Educational-are under the immediate direction and control of this small band of men.”
Everybody has heard of the “they” who seem to be in control of things.
“Whatever we call this self-perpetuating elitist group,” explained Professor Sutton, “it is apparently fundamentally significant in the determination of world affairs, at a level far behind and above that of the elected politicians.”
Before we explore who they are, I should point out that throughout this book you’ll notice a steady pattern of the following:
-
They disguise themselves and their intentions by creating groups which profess only the most innocent objectives. In this manner, they masquerade as humanitarians.
-
They frequently resort to lying and deceiving to accomplish their objectives.
-
They often use the National Security Act to justify their destructive deeds and to provide cover when they get caught.
So who are “they?”
Apparently, Wall Street, multinational corporations, international banks and wealthy people have formed elite groups to serve as vehicles for their interests.
These include Think Tanks such as,
-
the Council on Foreign Relations
-
the Trilateral Commission
-
the Bilderbergers,
…and others, which are interlocked with the Tax-exempt Foundations and the Federal Reserve.
According to Professor Sutton, Think Tanks, the Federal Reserve, the Executive Branch of the White House, Law, Education, and Media are all interlocked at the top, and controlled by an elite cabal.
“We should realize that many of these groups are closely allied together,” agreed Professor Marrs.
“In some cases,” he said, “the same man may simultaneously serve as either president or on the board of directors of a banking and money institution, a political group, an intelligence organization, a religious denomination or organization, and a foundation or educational group.”
Perloff acknowledged this interlock too, when he stated that their members serve “on the boards of vast foundations,” such as “Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie.”
Rene Wormser, General Council to the Reece Committee which investigated Tax-exempt Foundations, provides us with an example of interlocking directorates. In his book, Foundations: Their Power And Influence, he sites a report from a congressional investigation by the Reece Committee, concerning the Rand Corporation.
He states,
“This is a corporation in the nature of a foundation, which plays a very important part in government research. It would warrant special attention in connection with any study of the extent to which foundation interlocks have influenced government.”
“Among the trustees and officers of The Rand Corporation,” continues Wormser, “were found [by the Reece Committee] the following who had material connections with other foundations: Charles Dollard (trustee), Carnegie Corporation; L.A. Dudbridge (trustee), Carnegie Endowment National Science Foundation; H. Rowan Gaither, Jr. (trustee) Ford Foundation; Philip E. Mosely (trustee), Ford Foundation… Frederick F. Stephan (trustee), Rockefeller Foundation … Hans Speier (officer) (Ford) Behavioral Science Division…”
These Think Tanks hold regular meetings, which are not open to the public. According to a book entitled, Who’s Who of the Elite, by Robert Gaylon Ross, topics of conversation include wars.
He explained,
“[they] decide when wars should start, how long they should last, when they should end, who will and will not participate, the changes in boundaries of countries resulting from the outcome of these wars, who will lend the money to support the war efforts, and who will lend the money to rebuild the countries after they have been destroyed by war.”
“They own the central banks,” continued Ross, “such as the Federal Reserve System in the US, and similar organizations in all major countries throughout the world, and therefore are in a position to determine discount rates, prime rates … [&] what countries should receive loans (guaranteed by the taxpayers of the respective countries)…
They decide who will be allowed to run for the offices of President, Prime Minister, Chancellor, Governor General, or other names applied to the leaders of all major countries around the world.” In addition, they, “directly or indirectly own all the major news media, and can therefore tell the public exactly what they want them to hear, and deny the public information they do not want them to see, hear, or read.”
If the general population knew that a handful of unelected people were running their government they would probably be outraged.
This “legitimate mafia” prefers to remain behind the scenes, apparently so people will still believe they live in a constitutional republic. But their existence is not completely hidden. By incident, or accident, people such as targeted individuals, corporate/government whistleblowers and others, have directly experienced how government really works and who controls it.
Their experience on the front lines have given them insights into approaching situations that the general population is not yet aware of.
“Secret elitist groups always censor, or try to censor, news about their covert activities,” declared Antony Sutton and Patrick Wood in their book, Trilaterals Over Washington.
“Censorship stems from the overall need for secrecy, to conceal from the world at large. As long as Trilaterals (and Bilderbergers and other elite groups) skulk around the world convening closed meetings in secluded corners with security guards to keep out the press then we may conclude that Trilaterals, Bilderbergers, and the rest have something to hide.”
Most members of these elite organizations are not aware of their true objectives.
According to these researchers, there is an inner-core of members that are.
“These members are aware of only about 50%, or less of the goals, and objectives of the Global Union movement,” proclaimed Ross. “A large number of these people are members for ego, and social reasons only,” and would probably resign if they were to “find out what the Global Union is ‘really’ up to.”
These elite organizations have been called Think Tanks or modern secret societies.(**)
Some receive their funding from Tax-exempt Foundations.
“The existence of groups like the Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, and the Bilderbergers is well documented,” stated Jim Marrs in his underground bestseller, Rule by Secrecy. “The only question is the extent of their control and manipulation of major world events.”
“Likewise,” said Marrs, “there is no question that members of these societies exert inordinate control over many of the largest corporations and banks in the world. These corporations, in turn, control essential minerals, energy, transportation, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, telecommunications, and entertainment-in other words, the basics of modern life.”
When these policies are set at the top by the controlling elite who have been known to promote a one-world socialist order, then it’s understandable how destructive policies, which appear to be positive, can be filtered down to local and state governments.
Marrs explained,
“If the top leadership of government and business is controlled … then the activities of subservient agencies and divisions must be of little consequence. Government bureaucrats – honest and well-intentioned workers for the most part – simply follow orders and policies set by superiors.”
Former FBI Agent Dan Smoot acknowledged this covert power structure in his book, The Invisible Government, when he wrote,
“Somewhere at the top of the pyramid in the invisible government are a few sinister people who know exactly what they are doing…”
The invisible government that Smoot refers to has established identifiable groups, which it uses as vehicles to carry out its policies.
In his bestselling book, None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Author Gary Allen, declared that they have “established some very special and highly influential organizations, many of which have clandestine aims and goals.”
He lists some of these groups as,
“the Bilderbergers, the Club of Rome, the Aspen Institute, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, [and] the Bohemian Grove.”
Local, state, and federal law enforcement are reportedly controlled by these Think Tanks.
“The Elite control our courts, the Pentagon, the U.N., NATO, N.S.A., C.I.A., F.B.I., B.A.T.F., our Senate and House of Representatives,” charged Ross, “and directly or indirectly control all local law enforcement agencies.”
Author Marrs agreed that government agencies under control of these elite groups include,
“not only the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA),” he said “but the National Security Council (NSC), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), National Security Agency (NSA), Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and many others.” He added, “These agencies are themselves secretive, citing reasons of national security, [&] executive privilege.”
“The Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and a few others – numbering less than a dozen leaders of international finance are the real power behind the visible thrones of world government,” observed Professor Marrs.
“No major policy is formulated without their input; no major plan of action is implemented without their specific ‘go’ signal.”
One of my goals is to show you who “they” are, what they’ve done, how they’ve covered it up, and what their plans are.
Throughout the rest of this book, myself & other authors will periodically refer to these interlocking Think Tanks using the abbreviations, BB for Bilderberg, TC for Trilateral Commission, and CFR for Council on Foreign Relations.
Now I’ll explain these elite groups in more detail. Let’s meet your unelected rulers.
Footnotes
* From the information I’ve come across, the term New World Order has been used to describe three things: a political movement, a group of individuals bringing about the movement, and joint reference to both the movement and the group fostering it. My understanding is that the term refers to the movement.
** Some literature describes these organizations as think tanks or modern secret societies, and others describe them as foundations. Carnegie Endowment is listed as a foundation in Foundations: Their Power and Influence by Wormser, but also listed as a think tank in Who’s Who of the Elite by Ross, and Trilaterals Over Washington by Sutton and Wood. Author Marrs describes the CFR, TC and Bilderbergers as modern secret societie
The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski. It has headquarters in New York, Paris, and Tokyo.
It is said to be funded by the tax-exempt giants like Ford, Lilly Endowment, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the German Marshall Fund, and corporations such as Time, Bechtel, Exxon, General Motors, Wells-Fargo, etc.
Its membership is composed of past and present presidents, ambassadors, secretaries of state, Wall Street investors, NATO and pentagon military personnel, international bankers, foundation executives, media owners, university presidents and professors, senators and congressmen, and wealthy industrialists and entrepreneurs.
“The Trilateral Commission was formally established in 1973 and consisted of leaders in business, banking, government, and mass media from North America, Western Europe, and Japan,” wrote James Perloff.
“David Rockefeller was founding chairman and Brzezinski founding director of the North American branch, most of whose members were also in the CFR,” he added. Author Jim Marrs announced, “With the blessing of the Bilderbergers and the CFR, the Trilateral Commission began organizing on July 23-24, 1973 at the 3,500-acre Rockefeller estate at Pocantico Hills, a subdivision of Tarrytown, New York.”
Its existence is a proven fact as verified by mainstream news sources such as Time Magazine, the Wall Street Journal, U.S. News and World Report, and The Washington Post, as well as multiple books including,
-
Trilaterals Over Washington, by Professor Antony Sutton and Patrick M. Wood
-
America’s Secret Establishment, by Professor Antony Sutton
-
Dark Majesty by Professor Texe Marrs (no known relation to Jim Marrs)
-
The Shadows of Power, by James Perloff,
…and others.
Professor Antony Sutton wrote,
“The organization is completely above ground. In fact,” he stated, “this author has openly debated with George Franklin, Jr., … of the Trilateral Commission on the radio. Mr. Franklin did show a rather ill-concealed dislike of the assault on his pet global New World Order – and made the mistake of attempting to disguise this objective.”
The Trilateral Commission has an official publication called, Trialogue.
It also issues multiple Task Force Reports (also called Triangle Papers) per year. Although its meetings are invitation-only, its membership list is publicly available and can be obtained by contacting them at: 345 East 46th Street, Suite 711, New York, NY 10017.
Authors Sutton and Wood comment about the seemingly innocent objectives of the Trilateral Commission. Quoting from the objectives which appear in every issue of Trialogue, they wrote,
“The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Western Europe, Japan and North America to foster closer cooperation among these three regions on common problems. It seeks to improve public understanding of such problems, to support proposals for handling them jointly, and to nurture habits and practices of working together among these regions.”
Sutton and Wood then explain that the rest of their book is devoted to telling the truth about the commission.
Referring to the Task Force Report entitled, The Crisis of Democracy written in part by Harvard political scientist Samuel P. Huntington, author Marrs noted,
“The paper suggested that leaders with ‘expertise, seniority, experience and special talents’ were needed to ‘override the claims of democracy.'”
He added,
“Three years after his paper was published, Huntington was named coordinator of the 1979 presidential order creating the Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], a civilian organization with the power to take totalitarian control of government functions in the event of a national ’emergency.'”
Like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission has infiltrated the executive branch of the United States government.
Regarding the beginning of this pattern of infiltration into the White House, Sutton and Wood commented,
“On 7 January 1977 Time magazine, whose editor-in-chief, Hedley Donovan, is a powerful Trilateral Commissioner, named President Carter ‘Man of the year.'”
They added,
“Carter had already chosen his cabinet. Three of his cabinet members – Vance, Blumenthal, and Brown – were Trilateral Commissioners… In addition, Carter had appointed another fourteen Trilateral Commissioners to top government posts… These presidential appointees represented almost one-third of the Trilateral Commission members from the United States. Try to give odds to that!”
The January 16, 1977 issue of The Washington Post expressed,
“Trilateralists are not three-sided people. They are members of a private, though not secret, international organization put together by the wealthy banker, David Rockefeller, to stimulate the establishment dialog between Western Europe, Japan and the United States. But here is the unsettling thing about the Trilateral Commission.
The President-elect [Carter] is a member. So is the Vice-President-elect Walter F. Mondale. So are the new Secretaries of State, Defense and Treasury. So is Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is a former Trilateral Director and Carter’s National Security Adviser, also a bunch of others who will make foreign policy for America in the next four years.”
The same issue of The Washington Post reported that,
“At last count, 13 Trilateralists had gone into top positions in the administration, not to mention six other Trilateralists who are established as policy advisers, some of whom may also get jobs. This is extraordinary when you consider that the Trilateral Commission only has about 65 American members.”
Author Perloff wrote,
“The new President [Carter] appointed more than seventy men from the CFR, and over twenty members of the much smaller Trilateral Commission.
Zbigniew Brzezinski acknowledges in his White House Memoirs:
‘Moreover, all the key foreign policy decision makers of the Carter Administration had previously served in the Trilateral Commission…’
“Brzezinski,” stated Perloff, “of course, became National Security Adviser, the same position Kissinger had held.”
Commenting on a June 18, 1974 article in the New York Times, which stated,
“the lives and fortunes of large numbers of human beings hang upon the outcome of decisions taken by a small handful of national leaders-on the Trilateral Commission,” Gary Allen warned that “it was time to pay more attention – a lot more attention – to the group.”
Regarding the consolidation process of the New World Order, Sutton and Wood commented,
“In September 1974 Brzezinski was asked in an interview by the Brazilian newspaper Vega, ‘How would you define this new world order?'”
Brzezinski answered,
“We need to change the international system for a global system in which new, active and creative forces – recently developed – should be integrated. This system needs to include Japan, Brazil, the oil producing countries, and even the USSR…”
When asked if Congress would have an expanded or diminished role in the new system, Brzezinski declared,
“The reality of our times is that a modern society such as the U.S. needs a central coordinating and renovating organ which cannot be made up of six hundred people.”
This man is telling you that this New World Order will be a consolidation of individual countries into a single world government, which will be controlled by a small clique of insiders, who believe they are fit to rule the planet. Anytime you have a consolidation of the power such as this, you have a dictatorship.
Quoting from Brzezinski’s book, Between Two Ages, Sutton and Wood wrote that Brzezinski described Marxism as,
“a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s universal vision… Tension is unavoidable as man strives to assimilate the new into the framework of the old. But at some point the old framework becomes overloaded.”
Brzezinski continued,
“The new input can no longer be redefined into traditional forms, and eventually it asserts itself with compelling force. Today, though the old framework of international politics – with … the fiction of sovereignty … is clearly no longer compatible with reality.”
According to Sutton and Wood, when Brzezinski uses the word “framework” he apparently means the U.S. Constitution; if this is so, then what he told us in 1971 is that the Trilateral Commission plans to make drastic changes to the U.S. Constitution.
“One of the most important ‘frameworks’ in the world … is the United States Constitution,” exclaimed Sutton and Wood.
So why is it so important to these elite organizations that the Constitution be changed?
Well, they’ve admitted in their own publications that they tend to merge the U.S. and other NATO countries into a single world government controlled by the big corporations. Would a constitution which guarantees individual freedom interfere with their plan? Before the amendments made by the U.S. Patriot Act, and other anti-terror legislation, the constitution made it impossible for a totalitarian regime to flourish in the United States.
Sutton and Wood wrote that the Trilaterals wanted to assemble,
“a national constitutional convention to re-examine the nation’s formal institutional framework,” in order to open up “a national dialog on the relevance of existing arrangements… The needed change,” said the Trilaterals “is more likely to develop incrementally and less overtly.”
Brzezinski himself declared,
“International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.”
Changing “existing arrangements” can be safely translated to existing freedoms, such the Bill of Rights.
And “less overtly” means they’ll be making these changes without your approval using deception.
Sutton and Wood commented,
“When Brzezinski refers to “develop(ing) incrementally and less overtly” he is specifically recommending a deceptive… approach to abandonment of the Constitution.”
After the current “framework” is removed, it will apparently be replaced with a world constitution furnished by the UN, which doesn’t guarantee personal freedom as a human right, but makes it a privilege, which is granted if possible.
When multinational corporations and banks run the planet, this is basically global fascism. Whether it’s called fascism, or communism, or socialism, it’s all the same, which is control by those in charge of the state, or super-state, in the case of the New World Order.
Again Sutton and Wood warn,
“Those ideals which led to the heinous abuses of Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, and Mussolini are now being accepted as necessary inevitabilities by our elected and appointed leaders.”
“Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.”
-Benito Mussolini
In his bestselling book, With No Apologies, Senator Barry Goldwater described the true intentions of the Trilateral Commission as,
“a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power-political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical [religious].”
He added,
“All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world.”
In other words by using a big lie.
The Task Force report put out by the TC entitled, The Crisis of Democracy stated,
“The democratic political system no longer has any purpose. The concepts of equality and individualism give problems to authority. The media is not sufficiently subservient to the elite. Democracy has to be “balanced” (i.e., restricted). The authority and power of the central government must be increased.”
These people are telling you that they’re going to restrict your individual rights and centralize power into corporate hands.
There can be no confusion over the objectives of this group that has infiltrated the executive branch since the 1970s. They are telling you in their own publications exactly what they intend to do.
They are setting up a worldwide fascist dictatorship!
“Trilateralism is the current operational vehicle for a corporate socialist takeover,” advised Sutton and Wood.
Likewise, Senator Goldwater calls the Trilateral Commission an “international cabal,” which,
“is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States.”
This covert takeover has been done, not by a civil war but by infiltration.
On July 23, 1976, the Greek newspaper Exormisis recognized this overthrow when they wrote,
“A new kind of fascism emerges with Carter. The oppression will not have the form we used to know, but it will be the ‘depoliticization’ of all citizens in the U.S., and the generating of all power in the executive branch, that is, the Presidency, without the President giving any account to the Congress or anybody else except the multinationals [Banks/Corporations], which have financed Carter’s campaign… The accession to power of Carter … would mean a new era of dictatorial policies.”
Carter Pictured left, Jimmy Carter of the Trilateral Commission chose fellow Trilaterals Zbigniew Brzezinski (center) for National Security Advisor, and Cyrus Vance for Secretary of State.(*)
“Like sheep going to slaughter, our people cannot smell the death that awaits them,” warned Sutton and Wood. “If we are about to be thrown into the pits of the dark ages, the most logical catalyst, or motivator on the horizon is the TRILATERAL COMMISSION.”
Summary
The Trilateral Commission presents itself as a humanitarian group, which seeks to promote world peace through understanding and cooperation.
However, its publications indicate that it plans to install a worldwide dictatorship, which will be dominated by the multinational corporations. This is being accomplished using deception.
Footnotes
Photo taken from Shadows of Power, by James Perloff.
The Council on Foreign Relations
Congressman James E. Jeffries wrote,
“If the Establishment is elusive in its identity, it certainly has a perceptible face in the Council on Foreign Relations…”
Like its counterpart The Trilateral Commission, the CFR is composed of Wall Street investors, international bankers, foundation executives, members of Think Tanks and Tax-exempt Foundations, ambassadors, past and present presidents, secretaries of state, lobbyist lawyers, media owners, university presidents and professors, federal and supreme court judges, and members of military leaders from NATO and the pentagon.
It was formally established in New York, on July 29, 1921, as a counterpart to a British group called, The Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA).
“The CFR and RIIA were originally intended to be affiliates, but became independent bodies, although they have always maintained close informal ties,” wrote James Perloff, in his well-documented book, The Shadows of Power.
CFR HQIts meetings are not open to the public and membership is by invitation only.
Like the Trilateral Commission, its membership list is publicly available. The CFR puts out a publication known as Foreign Affairs which has been called “the most influential periodical in print,” by Time Magazine. They are located at the Harold Pratt House, 58 East 68th Street in New York City, New York 10021. Pictured right is the CFR headquarters at the Harold Pratt House.(*)
It was originally dominated by J.P. Morgan interests, and began to gain momentum around 1927 with funding from the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations. The founding president was John W. Davis, millionaire and personal attorney of J. P. Morgan.
Some other early/founding CFR members included, Henry Davison, Thomas Thacher, Harold Swift, W. Averill Harriman, John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, Thomas Lamont, Paul Cravath, Federal Reserve architect Paul Warburg, Mortimer Schiff (Jacob’s son), Morgan partner Russell Leffingwell, and other Morgan partners.
Jim Marrs wrote in his book Rule by Secrecy that,
“Funding for the CFR came from bankers and financiers such as Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Bernard Baruch, Jacob Schiff, Otto Kahn, and Paul Warburg.
Today, funding for the CFR comes from major corporations such as Xerox, General Motors, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Texaco, and others as well as the German Marshall Fund, McKnight Foundation, Dillion Fund, Ford Foundation, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Starr Foundation, and the Pew Charitable Trusts.”
The CFR created junior chapters in most major cities called, Committees on Foreign Relations. These junior chapters hold periodic dinner meetings.
Many researchers on this subject agree that there is an inner and outer core of the CFR and its interlocking Think Tanks. Members of the outer ring are just window dressing or camouflage, and are not aware of the motivating factors of the inner-core. The inner-core appears to be members of the steering and advisory committees.
Similar to the TC objectives, those of the CFR seem humanitarian on the surface.
Describing this façade in his book, Who’s Who of the Elite, Robert Gaylon Ross explained,
“Let’s start with the smoke and mirrors furnished by the CFR in several of their Annual Reports.”
Quoting a CFR Annual Report from 1993-4, he said,
“The Council on Foreign Relations is a non-profit, and non-partisan membership organization dedicated to improving the understanding of U.S. foreign policy, and international affairs through the exchange of ideas.”
However, he states,
“if you are doing something illegal, immoral, unethical, unpopular, and/or unconstitutional, you will do whatever is necessary to see that it is kept secret.”
Professor Sutton describes the CFR as,
“superficially an innocent forum for academics, businessmen, and politicians, [which] contains within its shell, perhaps unknown to many of its members, a power center that unilaterally determines U.S. foreign policy.”
He states that their true “subversive” objective is,
“the acquisition of markets and economic power… for a small group of giant multinationals under the virtual control of a few banking investment houses and controlling families.”
Former FBI Agent Dan Smoot observed the same veil of deception. In his book, The Invisible Government, he wrote,
“The leadership of the invisible government doubtless rests in the hands of a sinister… few.”
Regarding the majority of members he stated,
“Many, if not most, of these are status-seekers.”
But warned,
“The ultimate aim” of the CFR, “however, well-intentioned its prominent and powerful members may be” is “to create a one-world socialist system.”
When you see the word socialism think tyrannical dictatorship, dominated by the big corporations and international banks.
“A number of individuals are apparently invited into the CFR simply because they have a distinguished name or other enhancing qualities,” stated Perloff. He continued, “[they] join without endorsing or even knowing the Council’s habitual viewpoint.”
“However,” he said, “The membership’s great majority… have been chronically pro-socialist and pro-globalist.”
Professor Sutton recognized,
“most members of the CFR have no knowledge of this diabolical plan. But there is an inner core within the CFR that… promotes it.”
Regarding the media blackout, Allen observed,
“During its first fifty years of existence, the CFR was almost never mentioned by any of the moguls of the mass media.”
“And,” he added, “When you realize that the membership of the CFR includes top executives from the New York Times, The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Knight Newspaper chain, NBC, CBS, Time, Life, Fortune, Business Week, US News and World Report, and many others, you can be sure that such anonymity is not accidental.”
Referring to the whitewashed Reece Committee investigations which feebly investigated the Tax-exempt Foundations interlocked with the CFR, Smoot wrote,
“The power of the Council is somewhat indicated by the fact that no committee of Congress has yet been powerful enough to investigate it or the foundations with which it has interlocking connections and from which it receives its support.”
He declared,
“In 1939, the Council began taking over the U.S. State Department.”
Admiral WardAdmiral Chester Ward, former Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy, remained in the CFR for about 20 years and co-authored a book entitled, Kissinger on the Couch, where he wrote,
“Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the U.S. Government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition.”
To the left we see Admiral Chester Ward (right) swearing in William Frankey as the Assistant Secretary of the Navy.
The Admiral also warned that the goal of the CFR is the,
“submergence of US sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.”
In the August 1978 issue of W Magazine, former CFR President Winston Lord is quoted as saying,
“The Trilateral Commission doesn’t secretly run the world. The Council on Foreign Relations does that.”
Rene Wormser who served on the Reece Committee investigating the multi-billion-dollar Tax-exempt Foundations and their interlocks, wrote in his book, Foundations, that,
“The Council on Foreign Relations” is “virtually an agency of the government,” and that it is “financed both by the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations, [and furthermore it] overwhelmingly propagandizes the globalist concept.”
Author Allen agreed when he wrote,
“The C.F.R. is totally interlocked with the major foundations and [other] so-called ‘Think Tanks.'”
Regarding the interlocking Think Tanks, Dan Smoot explained,
“All of the organizations have federal tax-exemption as ‘educational’ groups; and they are all financed, in part, by tax-exempt foundations, the principal ones being Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie. Most of them also have close working relations with official agencies of the United States Government.”
Referring to the CFR’s infiltration into the White House, Senator Goldwater wrote that the CFR has,
“staffed almost every key position of every administration since that of FDR.”
The senate was apparently concerned about the influence and infiltration of the CFR into the White House.
Quoting a Congressional Record, dated December 15, 1987, vol. 133, Perloff wrote,
“Senator Jesse Helms, after noting the CFR’s place within the Establishment, put it this way before the Senate in December 1987: The viewpoint of the Establishment today is called globalism… Mr. President, in the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything. Political philosophies and political principles seem to become simply relative. Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise of power…”
In an article called, School for Statesmen, which appeared in the July 1958 issue of Harpers, CFR member Columnist Joseph Kraft, proclaimed,
“It [the CFR] has been the seat of some basic government decisions, has set the context for many more, and has repeatedly served as a recruiting ground for ranking officials.”
Allen commented,
“The policies promoted by the C.F.R. in the fields of defense and international relations become, with regularity which defies the laws of chance, the official policies of the United States Government.”
“Today the C.F.R remains active in working toward its final goal of a government over all of the world – a government which the Insiders and their allies will control,” declared Allen.
“The goal of the C.F.R. is simply to abolish the United States with its constitutional guarantees of liberty. And they don’t even try to hide it.”
Study No. 7, published by the CFR on November 25, 1959, advocates,
“building a new international order [which] must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, [and] for social and economic change.” This new order will include, “states labeling themselves as ‘Socialist’ [Communist].”
Allen refers to the CFR as the “invisible government,” and says it is “unquestionably” the “most influential group in America.”
Former Agent Smoot concurs, writing,
“I am convinced that the Council on Foreign Relations, together with a great number of other associated tax-exempt organizations, constitutes the invisible government which sets the major policies of the federal government.”
Continuing, he said, the CFR,
“exercises controlling influence of government officials who implement the policies; and, through massive and skillful propaganda, influences Congress and the public to support the policies.”
He stated further that,
“the objective of this invisible government is to convert America into a socialist state and then make it a unit in a one-world socialist system.”
CFR Meeting This 1968 photograph on the right shows President Johnson consulting with advisors regarding Vietnam peace talks.
Except Johnson, all were members of the CFR. Left to right: Andrew Goodpaster, Averell Harriman, Cyrus Vance, Maxwell Taylor, Walt Rostow, Richard Helms, William Bundy, Nicholas Katzenbach, Dean Rusk, President Johnson.
Helms was not a CFR member at that time, but joined later.
“We shall have world government whether or not you like it – by conquest or consent.”
-CFR member James Warburg,
testifying at Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950
Regarding the CFR’s plan for a single world government, Perloff said,
“The CFR advocates the creation of a world government.” And, “Anyone who cares to examine back issues of Foreign Affairs will have no difficulty finding hundreds of articles that pushed… this concept of globalism.”
“For decades,” said Perloff, “the CFR pushed this ascending approach to world government, with Foreign Affairs carrying such titles as Toward European Integration: Beginnings in Agriculture, Toward Unity in Africa, Toward a Caribbean Federation, and so on.”
He quotes a 1974 article which stated,
“The house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down… an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
Very few people are aware of the existence of the CFR or its purpose. This appears to be the case with their interlocking Think Tanks such as the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission.
Perloff said,
“Today, probably not one American in five hundred can identify the CFR, despite the fact that it is arguably the most powerful political entity in the United States.”
And Allen’s estimate is higher; he comments,
“It is doubtful that one American in a thousand so much as recognizes the Council’s name, or that one in ten thousand can relate anything at all about its structure or purpose.”
Summary
The CFR is a supra-governmental organization that overshadows congress.
It is financed by the Tax-exempt Foundations, and portrays itself as a humanitarian group. But its objectives are to erode national sovereignty and merge America into a worldwide government under the control of its members, which include people of tremendous wealth. Basically, their goal is global fascism.
The CFR is responsible for setting major policy, which is activated without public knowledge or consent. It is beyond congressional investigation.
Footnotes
* All photos taken from Shadows of Power, by James Perloff.
The Bilderbergers are an international group composed of European Royalty, Wall Street investors, politicians, international bankers, prominent businessmen, media executives, and military leaders from around the planet. “Those in attendance include leading political and financial figures from the United States and Western Europe,” proclaimed Allen. Allen also says that it is probably “not accidental,” that less than one person in 5,000 is aware of this group. Jim Marrs wrote, “The Bilderbergers are a group of powerful men and woman-many of them European royalty – who meet in secret each year to discuss the issues of the day.”
Bilderberg HotelThe first official meeting of the Bilderbergers took place at the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Holland in May 1954. It was formed in part by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, a former Nazi. “The primary impetus for the Bilderberger meetings came from Dutch Prince Bernhard,” wrote author Marrs, “a former member of the Nazi Schutzstaffel (SS) and an employee of Germany’s I.G. Farben in Paris.” The Rockefellers and Rothschilds are said to have played an important part in its inception also. Pictured right is the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Holland.(*)
Veteran journalist James P. Tucker has investigated the Bilderbergers nearly 30 years. His book, The Bilderberg Diary, which includes photographic evidence, is a well-documented account of the results of his investigation. In it he writes, “The Bilderberg group is an organization of political leaders and international financers that meets secretly every spring to make global policy. There are about 110 regulars,” he says, including, “Rockefellers, Rothschilds, bankers, heads of international corporations and high government officials from Europe and North America.” These people meet at varying locations around the planet.
Referring to the financial elite’s various fronts, Professor Marrs wrote, “Comprising themselves in the form of the Bilderberger Group, they have met at least annually since 1954.” Their meetings are by invitation only, and according to Gaylon Ross, of the three interlocking Think Tanks, they are the most secretive. They are also the most influential. Their meetings are financed by the Tax-exempt Foundations. Allen asked, “Why do the Ford, Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations finance the meetings if they are not important?”
In 1964, Dan Smoot acknowledged this elite group when he wrote, “The ‘Bilderbergers’ are another powerful group involved in the internationalist web.” Speaking of the interlocking membership, he proclaimed, “American firms associated with the society are said to be among the large corporations whose officers are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and related organizations.”
The Bilderbergers have close ties to Europe’s nobility such as the British royal family, as well as royalty from Holland, Sweden and Spain. They also contain the same representatives in finance and industry as their counterparts, The Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations. There is also a heavy cross-membership with the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations.
“As with the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderbergers often carry cross-membership in two or more of these three groups, commented Marrs.” Allen remarked, “Those who adhere to the accidental theory of history will claim that it is sheer coincidence that every single one of those named as past and present members of the Bilderberger Steering Committee is or was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.”
The Bilderbergers are said to be the organization that sets global policy which is then passed on to the CFR and TC to implement. While the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations both publish their membership rolls, the Bilderbergers keep the meetings, goals, and membership lists secret. “Bilderberg does not publish membership lists but they have been obtained by investigative reporters working for The Spotlight,” wrote Ross.
SWAT Each year the hosting government is responsible for providing heavy security for three days, which includes: the military, the secret service, federal and local police, and private security firms. Allen explains, “The participants are housed in one location and are protected by a thorough security network. Decisions are reached, resolutions adopted, plans of action initiated…” A Swedish SWAT team member confronts Tucker during the 2001 Bilderberg meeting in Gothenburg Sweden.
“When they meet, they clear out all the guests, and employees in the building in which they are to meet,” Ross said, and added “they completely de-bug all the rooms, bring in their own cooks, waiters, housekeepers, heavily armed security guards, etc. and do not allow ‘outsiders’ anywhere near the meeting place just before, during and immediately after they meet.”
Police EscortContinuing he explained, “Each time they have met on US soil, the meetings were held on Rockefeller owned property.” According to veteran journalist Tucker, some hotel staff is allowed to stay but are given strict orders to never to speak to a Bilderberger unless spoken to, or look them in the eyes. The picture on the right was taken during the 2003 Bilderberg meeting in Versailles, France, where Bilderberg attendees received police escorts.
Police Escort The German police vehicles on the left are escorting Bilderberg members during the 2005 meeting in Rottach-Egern, Germany. And below that is a Swedish police officer with a guard dog patrolling the woods outside the 2001 Bilderberg meeting in Gothenburg Sweden.
The Rutland Vermont Herald apparently received notice of a Bilderberg meeting when local officials were given instructions on how to prepare for it. It declared on April 20, 1971, “A rather tight lid of secrecy was being kept on the [Bilderberg] conference.” “A closed-door meeting,” it described, “was held in Woodstock last week to brief a handful of local officials on some phases of the [future] conference… The Woodstock Inn will apparently be sealed up like Fort Knox… No press coverage will be allowed.”
Referring to the same meeting which took place on April 23, 1971 in Woodstock, Vermont, Allen wrote, “When Prince Bernhard arrived at Boston’s Logan Airport, he did admit to reporters that the subject of the conference would be the “change in the world-role of the United States.” Allen remarked, “Isn’t it nice to have changes in America’s role in the world decided upon by Bernhard, Rothschild and Rockefeller?”
The mainstream news will normally not report on these meetings. Speaking of the media blackout Tucker said, “Bilderberg has, at one time or another, had representatives of all major U.S. newspapers and network news outlets attend. They do so on their promise to report nothing. This is how Bilderberg keeps its news blackout virtually complete in the United States.” According to Tucker, as part of a disinformation strategy, mainstream newspapers in the United States may even portray these meetings as harmless talk-sessions of little importance.
Marrs commented, “Unlike their American counterparts, some members of Scotland’s news media found their voice. Under the headline, Whole World in their Hands, Jim McBeth of The Scotsman described the tight security surrounding the [1998] meeting [at the Turnberry Hotel near Glasgow, Scotland], commenting, ‘Anyone approaching the hotel who did not have a stake in controlling the planet was turned back.'”
“The press, naturally, is not allowed to be present, although occasionally a brief press conference is held at the end of the meeting at which time the news media are given in very general terms the Bilderberger version of what was discussed,” observed Allen. Reporters that are not invited and attempt to document these meetings have been arrested. Marrs added, “Despite the fact that many highly regarded American media members meet with the Bilderbergers, little or nothing gets reported on the group or its activities…”
Although there is a media blackout concerning these meetings, the news media are always present, agreed Ross. He lists past attendees, “such as: Peter Jennings (BB, and Anchor and Senior Editor of ABC News, World News Tonight), Joseph C. Harsch (BB, CFR, and former Commentator for NBC, Inc.), Bill D. Moyers (BB, and Executive Director of Public Affairs TV, Inc., and former Director of the CFR), [and] William F. Buckley, Jr. (BB, CFR, and Editor-in-Chief of National Review, and host of PBS’s Firing Line).”
Ross says other media personnel which have attended include, “Gerald Piel (BB, CFR, and former Chairman of Scientific America, Inc.), Henry Anatole Grunwald (BB, CFR, and former Editor-in-Chief of Time, Inc.), Mortimer B. Zuckerman (BB, CFR, and Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of the US News and World Report, New York Daily News, and Atlantic Monthly), Robert L. Bartley (BB CFR, TC, and Vice President of the Wall Street Journal).”
Washington PostMore media attendees, according to Ross, are Peter Robert Kann (BB, CFR) of Dow Jones and Company, Donald C. Cook of the Los Angeles Times, Thomas L. Friedman of the New York Times, and Katherine Graham owner of The Washington Post. Most of these attendees have cross memberships in the CFR and TC. Here to the right we see Washington Post publisher Donald Graham (center) during the 2004 meeting in Stresa, Italy.
Tucker commented that mainstream media apparently doesn’t think these meetings are newsworthy. Evidently, for decades the Post and most other major media outlets didn’t think the public would be interested in learning about these world leaders meeting to shape world events. Is it possible that there’s something else of major significance they’re not reporting or are being used to cover-up?
On May 26, 1995 the Swiss newspaper, Tagesschau, ran a story entitled, The Swiss Military to Protect International and Leading Economists and Statesmen. The article explained, “Prominent leaders from the world of politics and economics will be meeting at Nidwalden on Mt. Bergenstock, Switzerland, for the very secretive Bilderberg conference… [A]mong the participants are Leading Bankers, politicians and industrialists from Europe and North America. The Luminaries from the 1995 meeting include Kurt Furgler, Walter Scheel, Henry Kissinger, Helmut Kohl, Fiat Chairman Giovanni Agnelli, shipping magnate Stavos Niarchos, David Rockefeller and Prince Claus of the Netherlands.”
RockefellerThe 1994 meeting in Helsinki, Finland, Tucker wrote, included, “In addition to Rockefeller and Kissinger, other familiar faces… [such as] Lord Peter Carrington, Queen Beatrix of Holland, NATO chief Woerner, President Ahtisaari and Prime Minister Esko Aho of Finland, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, German central banker Hans-Otto Pohl and Atos Erkko, a well known Finnish publisher.”
To the top left we see David Rockefeller at the 2004 Stresa Italy Bilderberg meeting. Below it we see him again (seated right) next to Vernon Jordan. Standing is Richard Perle (far right), and Jessica Mathews of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Also in attendance says Tucker, were, “Franz Vranitsky, President of Austria; Percy Barnevik, President of ABB (Asea Brown Boveri Ltd.) of Sweden; Giovanni Agnelli, head of the giant Fiat firm in Italy; Max Jacobson and Jaakko Illoniemi of Finland; Rozanne Ridgway, Assistant Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget; and Volker Ruhe of Germany.” Tucker lists other attendees as, “Katherine Gram, owner of The Washington Post Co.; Louis Gerstner of IBM; Thomas Pickering, U.S. Ambassador to Russia; Brent Scowcroft, Adviser to Bush; Paul Allaire of Xerox; Peter Sutherland of Britain; [and] Queen Sofia of Spain.”
Referring to the meeting in Versailles, France in 2003, Tucker announced, “The following have been positively identified as participating: Queen Beatrix of The Netherlands; Ali Babacan, Minister of the Economy in Turkey; King Juan Carlos and Queen Sophia of Spain; Jacques Chirac, President of France, Kenneth Clark, former British Chancellor of the Exchequer and member of the Parliament; Etienne D’avignon, Societe General of Belgium; Jean Louis Debre, President of the French National Assembly; Kermal Dervis, Turkey; Sevein Gjerem, CEO of the National Bank of Norway.”
Gerald Ford attended Bilderberg meetings 1964 and 1966, and in 1974 became President. And while Governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton attended a 1991 meeting before becoming President in 1992. Regarding Clinton’s Bilderberg connection, Marrs wrote, “In 1991, then Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton was honored as a Bilderberg guest. The next year he ran for and won the presidency of United States.”
The plan for a common European currency, the Euro, is said to have been formulated by the Bilderbergers. Tucker claims that the plan for a “European super-state” and the “euro” had been on the Bilderberg agenda for years. “It was viewed as a major step toward their goal of a world government and creates a favorable climate for the huge banks to consume the small ones and for the huge, international conglomerates to absorb the small firms,” he observed.
Quoting a Bilderberger, Marrs added that, “Jack Sheinkman, Chairman of Amalgamated Bank and a Bilderberger member, stated in 1996, ‘In some cases discussions do have an impact and become policy. The idea of a common European currency was discussed several years back before it became policy. We had a discussion about the U.S. establishing formal relations with China before Nixon actually did it.'”
“Bilderberg has had a direct influence on the White House since President Dwight Eisenhower’s years,” wrote Tucker. “They are accustomed to owning the president-whoever he is and whatever party is in control of the White House. A look back: Clinton, Trilateral and Bilderberg; Bush, Trilateral; Regan, received the Trilateralists at the White House and had his Vice President (Bush) address their meeting; Carter [Trilateralist] and his Vice President, Walter Mondale, both Bilderberg; Jerry Ford and his Vice President, Nelson Rockefeller, both Bilderberg…”
Tucker further proclaimed that “Most presidents have been members of at least one of these two groups [Bilderberg or Trilateral Commission], and all have had representatives attend Bilderberg meetings to receive their orders.” Allen observed the same pattern; he stated, “While the ‘new world order’ is being built, the Bilderbergers coordinate the efforts of the European and American power elites.” So according to this information the leaders of the NATO nations are covertly controlled by this elite group of financial elitists.
A single currency is said to be in the planning for the entire Western Hemisphere by the Bilderbergers, which will eventually be followed by a world currency. The Bilderbergers, according to Tucker, are also in the process of implementing a global citizens’ tax which will be payable to the United Nations. He wrote, “Like the federal income tax, a UN levy would be so small at the outset the consumer would hardly notice. But establishing the principle that the UN can directly tax citizens of the world is important to Bilderberg. It is another giant step toward world government. It is openly discussed with little public notice or objection…”
The objective of the Bilderberg Group appears to be the same as its interlocking Think Tanks, which is a one-world dictatorship, dominated by the financial elite. Journalist Tucker asserts, “Leaders of Bilderberg and its brother group, the Trilateral Commission… together make up the word shadow government.” Tucker informs us that what the Bilderbergers really intend is “a global army at the disposal of the United Nations.” And that “it has been a long standing goal of Bilderberg for the UN to become the world government to which all nations will be subservient.”
Wolfowitz & DavignonTo the right we see Honorary Bilderberg Chairman Etienne Davignon (left) with Paul Wolfowitz, former Secretary of Defense and current head of the World Bank, at the Bilderberg meeting in Rottach-Ergen, Germany in 2005. Professor Texe Marrs, has lectured at the University of Texas, authored over 25 books, and has retired from the USAF as an officer with numerous decorations. Writing with authority, backed by careful research, he concludes, “The goal of the Bilderbergers is to create a pretense [fake] democratic World Government, controlled by them.”
Author Marrs noted that Bilderberg members that are not part of the inner-core, may not be aware of the true intentions or objectives of the group, and may be convinced that world government is the only way to peace. This also appears to be the situation with its interlocking Think Tanks, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations.(*) “Not everyone who attends one of the Bilderbergers’ secret meetings is an Insider,” agreed Allen. “Bilderberg policy is not planned by those who attend the conferences, but by the elite steering committee of Insiders.”
“Remember, the Bilderbergers are philosophically neither Republican nor Democrat, declared Professor Marrs. “Their only ‘party’ is filthy lucre… Money, in turn, brings them power, and these folks have a never satisfied appetite for raw power.” Apparently Gorbachev was influenced by the Bilderbergers and talked about a global union during a speaking tour in the United States. “Gorbachev’s speeches could have been dictated by Kissinger after being drafted by Rockefeller… as content was concerned,” charged Tucker. “Gorbachev held out the Bilderberg-Trilateral vision of a UN military force that could invade once-sovereign nations to enforce ‘human rights.'” “The New World Order means a new kind of civilization,” Gorbachev told the Chicago CFR on May 8, 1991.
Regarding how President Clinton pushed the Bilderberger objective in 1999, Tucker wrote, “It appeared in daily newspapers for all to read, but too many sleep. The developments were celebrated by The Washington Post’s Bilderberg representative Jimmy Lee Hoagland in a column on June 27, 1999… [When he proclaimed], ‘The president promises a future in which Americans stand ready to intervene militarily if they can stop wholesale racial or ethnic slaughter “within or beyond other nations’ borders”… He promises a new world order.'” The first American woman to attend a Bilderberg meeting was Hilary Clinton in 1997. Author Marrs senses they may have plans for her in the following years.
Summary
Presidents and prime ministers are selected by the Bilderbergers and controlled like puppets. Bilderberg meetings are guarded by the military, SWAT teams, local police and private security firms. Like the CFR, their policy is passed without public approval. Their goal is to create a world government under their control, which will have the illusion of freedom.
Their motives for establishing a global dictatorship using a fake democracy will be expanded upon when we examine a future chapter on psychopathy. Most are unaware of their existence due to a media blackout. Despite attending Bilderberg meetings, mainstream media owners have reported little on this group for over fifty years.
Footnotes
* All Bilderberg Photos were taken from Jim Tucker’s Bilderberg Diary.
** Authors, Allen, Ross, and Sutton, all agree there is an inner-core.
Apparently there were constant battles for control of the republic between the international bankers and presidents.
Controlling the central bank of a country seems to be a crucial part of installing a dictatorship.
Allen wrote,
“From the earliest days, the Founding Fathers had been conscious of attempts to control America through money manipulation, and they carried on a running battle with the international bankers.”
“Essential to controlling a government is the establishment of a central bank with a monopoly on the country’s supply of money and credit,” wrote Perloff.
Meyer Rothschild is said to have remarked,
“Let me issue and control a nation’s money, and I care not who writes its laws.”
Allen concurred,
“All those who have sought dictatorial control over modern nations have understood the necessity of a central bank. When the League of Just Men hired a hack revolutionary named Karl Marx to write a blueprint for conquest called The Communist Manifesto, the fifth plank read: “Centralization of credit in the hands of the state… Lenin later said that the establishment of a central bank was ninety percent of communizing a country.”
Senator Barry Goldwater described an international banker as one who makes money by extending credit to governments. This is more beneficial to the banker than loaning to an individual because governments borrow much more, and they can guarantee repayment by burdening the people with taxes. Also, instead of debt payment, a banker may receive political influence.
Perloff wrote,
“No turn of events is more lucrative for an international banker than war – because nothing generates more government borrowing faster.”
“Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry, and commerce… and when you realize that the system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation, and depression originate.”
-President James Garfield July 2, 1881
One attempt to gain control of the country by way of a central bank was with the Bank of the United States (1816-36), which was abolished by President Andrew Jackson. Jackson warned,
“The bold effort the present [Bank of the United States] had made to control the government, the distress it had wantonly produced… are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it.”
Note the semantic deception used with the naming of the bank, “Bank of the United States,” as if to imply that it was part of the government. This was not the last time this tactic was used.(*)
Senator Goldwater wrote, “In the early years of the Republic… Jefferson opposed Alexander Hamilton’s scheme for the First Bank of the United States, and Andrew Jackson abolished Nicholas Biddle’s Second Bank of the United States.” “America heeded Jackson’s warning for the remainder of the century,” wrote Perloff. But the “tide began to turn… with the linking of European and U.S. banking interest, and the growing in power of America’s money barons, such as J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, and Bernard Baruch.”
A German banker named Paul Warburg migrated to the U.S. in 1902. He was an associate of the Rothschilds and became a partner in Kuhn, Loeb, and Company, which was headed by Jacob Schiff. The Schiffs also had ties to the Rothschilds, which went back about a century. Warburg began to lecture widely on the need for a central banking system.
Apparently the international bankers became impatient over the unwillingness of congress to accept a central bank. So using the Problem-Reaction-Solution formula, Wall Street deliberately created a panic to force congress to create a central banking system controlled by private interests. This was done to eliminate competition and to seize control of the country by way of the Federal Reserve System.
Perloff wrote, “The Panic of 1907 was artificially triggered to elicit public acceptance of this idea. Snowballing bank runs began after J.P. Morgan spread a rumor about the insolvency of the Trust Company of America.” He added, “Tragedy is the mother of new directions. The Panic of 1907 spawned the Federal Reserve.”
Allen described J. P. Morgan as “an old hand at creating artificial panics.” He stated, “Such affairs were well co-coordinated. Senator Robert Owen, a co-author of the Federal Reserve Act, (who later deeply regretted his role), testified before a Congressional Committee that the bank he owned received from the National Bankers’ Association what came to be know as the Panic Circular of 1893. It established: ‘You will at once retire one-third of your circulation and call in one-half of your loans.'”
On April 25, 1949, Life Magazine ran an article entitled, Morgan The Great, where historian Frederick Lewis Allen reported that “certain chroniclers have arrived at the ingenious conclusion that the Morgan interests took advantage of the unsettled conditions during the autumn of 1907 to precipitate the panic, guiding it shrewdly as it progressed so that it would kill off rival banks and consolidate the preeminence of the banks within the Morgan orbit.”
This deliberately created (problem) caused a predictable panic (reaction), which forced congress to create a commission to investigate other banking options, which resulted in the Federal Reserve (solution). In a Congressional Record dated, December 22, 1913, vol. 51, Congressman Charles Lindberg declared, “The Money Trust… caused the 1907 panic, and thereby forced Congress to create a National Monetary Commission.”
Federal Reserve BoardPerloff describes the Money Trust as, Wall Street monopolists such as Rockefeller, Morgan, Warburg, and Schiff. Heading the National Monetary Commission was Senator Nelson Aldrich, who was under the control of the international bankers. “Aldrich was known as the international bankers’ mouthpiece on Capitol Hill,” wrote Perloff. There was apparently some bribery that took place too. Top left is Paul Warburg. Bottom right is Frederic Delano.(**)
The commission spent about two years studying central banks in Europe, and finally the “Federal Reserve became law in December 1913,” declared Perloff. The solution was drafted at Morgan’s hunting club on Jekyl (sic) Island off the coast of Georgia. “The Fed,” stated Allen, “was drafted on Jekyl Island in Georgia by Senator Nelson Aldrich; Henry P. Davison of J. P. Morgan and Company; Frank A. Vanderlip, President of the Rockefeller-owned National City Bank; A. Piatt Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; Benjamin Strong of Morgan’s Bankers Trust Company; and [Rothschild representative] Paul Warburg.” Tucker added “The ‘Fed,’… is allied with the Bilderberg group, which is composed of the world’s biggest moneychangers – led by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds.”
The naming of this bank was another tactic of semantic deception; there is no reserve, and it’s not federal. The Federal Reserve is privately owned, it makes its own polices and is not subject to the president or congress. Many of its members are from the CFR. “Probably 90% of the US citizens think that the Federal Reserve System is one of the branches of the federal government,” Ross said, and added, “most think that it is part of the Treasury Department… because of the term ‘Federal’ in its name.” “This is no accident,” he proclaims, but a “psychological ploy to con the Americans into accepting their deception. It is not ‘Federal’ and there is no ‘Reserve.'”
Perloff added, “Indeed, the Fed is authorized to create money-and thus inflate – at will. According to the constitution, only Congress may issue money or regulate its value. The Federal Reserve Act, however, placed these functions in the hands of private bankers – to their perpetual profit.” Senator Goldwater wrote, “The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside of the control of Congress and through its Board of Governors manipulates the credit of the United States.”
Federal Reserve board members serve 14-year terms and are appointed by the president. “Since these positions control the entire economy of the country they are far more important than cabinet positions,” said Allen. He continued, “These appointments which should be extensively debated by the Senate are routinely approved.” The results he says are “ever-increasing debt requiring ever-increasing interest payments, inflation and periodic scientifically created depressions and recessions.”
Also in 1913, the 16th amendment was passed which subjected citizens to a federal tax. “Because income tax has been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1895, it had to be instituted by constitutional amendment,” wrote Perloff. Again, Senator Nelson Aldrich who was handled by the international bankers proposed the amendment. “The man who brought forward the amendment in Congress was the same senator who proposed the plan for the Federal Reserve – Nelson Aldrich,” observed Perloff.
Apparently the American people agreed to this new tax because they believed it would have a minimal impact on the middle class and would impede the rich. “Initially, it was nominal,” Perloff described, “a mere one percent of income under $20,000 – a figure few made in those days.” According to Perloff the American people were assured it would never increase.
Another reason is that the public was deceived by clever propaganda that the Federal Reserve would stabilize the economy and prevent future panics. “It did nothing of the kind,” declared Perloff. “Not only has our nation suffered through the Great Depression and numerous recessions, but inflation and federal debt-negligible problems before the Fed came into existence – have plagued America ever since.”
On June 10, 1932 Congressman Louis McFadden, a former chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency warned, “When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is – the Fed has usurped the government.”
Usurp
“1 to seize and hold (as office, place, or powers) in possession by force or without right.”
-Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary
Congressman Lindberg informed the public in a Congressional Record dated December 22, 1913, vol. 51, that “This [Federal Reserve] act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth… When the President signs this act the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized…” He warned, “I have seen these forces exerted during the different stages of this bill” and “The money power overawes the legislative and executive forces of the Nation and of the States.”
“If the key to controlling a nation is to run its central bank,” asked Perloff, “one can imagine the potential of a global central bank, able to dictate the world’s credit and money supply. The roots for such a system were planted when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank were formed at the Bretton Woods Conference of 1944. These UN agencies were both CFR creations,” he added.
Dr. Johannes Witteveen, former head of the IMF, said in 1975 that the agency should become “the exclusive issuer of official international reserve assets.” In the fall 1984 issue of a CFR newsletter called, Foreign Affairs, Richard N. Cooper laid out a modern plan for international currency. He wrote, “I suggest a radical alterative scheme for the next century: the creation of a common currency for all the industrial democracies, with a common monetary policy and a joint bank of Issue to determine that monetary policy.”
In 1987 Senator Jesse Helms, stated,
“it is no secret that the international bankers profiteer form sovereign state debt. The New York banks have found important profit centers in lending to countries plunged into debt by Socialist regimes. Under Socialist regimes, countries go deeper and deeper into debt because Socialism as an economic system does not work. International bankers are sophisticated enough to understand this phenomenon and they are sophisticated enough to profit from it.”
“Many historians would have us believe that this trio of events – the income tax, the Federal Reserve, and the War – was a coincidence,” wrote Perloff.
“But too often history has been written by authors financed by foundations, in books manufactured by Establishment publishing houses.” He observed, “Many more ‘coincidences’ were yet to trouble the American people in this century.”
Summary
Congressmen McFadden and Lindberg, both clearly state that the “legislative and executive forces” had been “usurped” (taken over) by an “invisible government” consisting of international “bankers” and “industrialists” acting together to “enslave the world for their own pleasure.”
What these researchers and statesmen are saying is that the Federal Reserve is a privately owned corporation, which was created using lies and deceit. It exists to control the nation, and to eliminate competition using taxation, in order to prevent the middle class from rising to affluence.
Footnotes
* A term commonly used by Charlotte Iserbyt in her book, The Deliberate Dumbing-Down of America.
** Photo taken from the Shadows of Power, by James Perloff.
Tax-exempt Foundations
Tax-exempt Foundations were originally setup for humanitarian purposes to provide grants to existing institutions.
Rene A. Wormser served as General Counsel to the Reece Committee, which was a congressional committee that investigated the Tax-exempt Foundations from 1953 to 1955. His book, Foundations: Their Power and Influence, is a documented expose of his experience with the committee. In it he wrote, “Foundations were originally created to support existing institutions and to undertake certain ‘operating’ functions.”
Soon after (or possibly from their inception) foundations became a loop hole that the financial elite used to avoid taxes. “By the time the income tax became law in 1913, the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations were already operating. Income tax didn’t soak the rich, it soaked the middle class,” wrote Perloff. “Because it was a graduated tax, it tended to prevent anyone from rising into affluence. Thus it acted to consolidate the wealth of the entrenched interests, and protect them from new competition.”
Smoot pointed out that the primary purpose of some of the large Tax-exempt Foundations is no longer humanitarian in nature, but “predominately tax avoidance.” “One of the leading devices by which the wealthy dodge taxes” concurred Perloff “is the channeling of their fortunes into tax-free foundations.” He also charged that, “The major foundations, though commonly regarded as charitable institutions, often use their grant-making powers to advance the interests of their founders.”
The “independent, uncontrolled financial power often enables foundations to exert a decisive influence on public affairs,” wrote Wormser. He further testified that, “They have a power comparable to political patronage.” He cautioned “When they do harm, it can be immense harm – there is virtually no counterforce to oppose them.”
What other projects do they fund? According to the findings of congressional investigations, the foundations have been known to fund political movements in a direction inclined to favor a socialistic, one-world government. Individual foundations have also been known to merge themselves in a “cartel-like” fashion to fund their political projects, which tends “to endanger the freedom of our intellectual and public life,” warned Wormser. Wormser referred to this merging as the Tax-exempt Complex.
The first glimpse into foundation influence came under the Congressional Act of August 23, 1912, when the Commission on Industrial Relations studied labor conditions and the treatment of workers by the major U.S. industrial firms. They eventually examined the foundations, which were interlocked with them. “Starting with a study of labor exploitation, it [the Commission on Industrial Relations] went on to investigate concentrations of economic power, interlocking directorates, and the role of the then relatively new large charitable foundations (especially of Carnegie and Rockefeller) as instruments of power concentration,” wrote Wormser.
During the commission hearings, future Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis testified on January 23, 1915, that he was seriously concerned about the emerging danger of such a concentration of power. He said, “When a great financial power has developed… which can successfully summon forces from all parts of the country… to carry out what they deem to be their business principle… [there] develops within the State a state so powerful that the ordinary social and industrial forces existing are insufficient to cope with it.”
“Control is being extended largely through the creation of enormous privately managed funds for indefinite purposes, hereinafter designated ‘foundations'” declared Mr. Basil M. Manly, director of research for the commission. The commission’s report concluded that, “As regards the ‘foundations’ created for unlimited general purposes and endowed with enormous resources, their ultimate possibilities are so grave a menace… [that] it would be desirable to recommend their abolition.”
Congress has declared that these foundations, which can be used to fund anything, should be eliminated because they are potentially destructive to the republic. According to Rene Wormser, even though these congressional findings occurred in 1915, the time period is irrelevant – they are still quite important. He stated, “Under totally different economic and social conditions, the findings of 1915 are still significant.”
The second investigation into the Tax-exempt Foundations came from the Cox Committee which lasted from 1952 until 1953. Again, fears of subversive political objectives funded by these multi-billion-dollar organizations (acting in concert) were eminent.
On August 1, 1951, a motivated Congressman E. E. Cox (Democrat) of Georgia introduced a resolution in the House of Representatives to conduct a thorough investigation into the foundations. He asserted, “There are disquieting evidences that at least a few of the foundations have permitted themselves to be infiltrated by men and women who are disloyal to our American way of life. They should be investigated and exposed to the pitiless light of publicity…”
The Cox resolution to investigate the foundations was passed in 1952. Unfortunately, Congressman Cox died during the investigation. The commission met the same fate as the one before it. No actions were taken to prevent the expansion of these foundations, or provide means for future accountability to the public. And as Smoot described it, “the final report of his [Cox] committee (filed January 1, 1953) was a pathetic whitewash of the whole subject.”
However, it did still yield some important facts. Part of the final report on January 1, 1953 said some foundations “supported persons, organizations, and projects which, if not subversive in the extreme sense of the word, tend to weaken or discredit [our] system as it exists in the United States and to favor Marxist socialism.” Or in other words, they were found to promote Communism.
The third attempt to investigate the foundations lasted from 1953 to 1955, during the Reece Committee hearings. Smoot wrote, “On April 23, 1953, the late Congressman Carroll Reece, (Republican, Tennessee) introduced a resolution proposing a committee to carry on the ‘unfinished business’ of the defunct Cox Committee. The new committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations… was approved by Congress on July 27, 1953.” Author Perloff added, “For what was probably the… last time, the CFR came under official scrutiny.”
Other organizations which came under investigation included, The American Council of Learned Societies, The National Research Council, the Social Science Research Council, the American Council on Education, the National Education Association, the League for Industrial Democracy, the Progressive Education Association, the American Historical Association, the John Dewey Society, and the Anti-Defamation League.
During the investigation, Norman Dodd, Director of Research for the Reece Committee, was invited to the headquarters of the Ford Foundation by its president, H. Rowan Gaither. Gaither, a member of the CFR, revealed that the Ford Foundation was operating under directives from the White House to use their grant-making power to “make every effort to… alter life in the United States… to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.” Apparently Mr. Dodd was put under surveillance, stalked, and experienced character assassination.
The committee was attacked viciously and resulted in a whitewash. Recognizing another unsuccessful attempt to scrutinize the interlocks, Smoot said, “It went out of existence on January 3, 1955, having proven, mainly, that the mammoth tax-exempt foundations have such power in the White House, in Congress, and in the press that they are quite beyond the reach of a mere committee of the Congress of the United States.”
But the committee did yield some helpful information. It found that the Tax-exempt Foundations, their intermediaries and interlocks have “exercised a strong effect” on “public education,” which “has been accomplished by [using] vast propaganda, by supplying executives and advisors to government and by controlling much research in this area through the power of the purse.” And that, “The net result of these combined efforts has been to promote a ‘world government.'”
Quoting from the final report of the committee, Perloff wrote, “The report… observed that major foundations have actively supported attacks upon our social and government system and financed the promotion of socialism and collectivist ideas.” The Committee declared that the CFR was “in essence an agency of the United States Government” and that its “productions are not objective but are directed overwhelmingly at promoting the globalist concept.”
“The Reece Committee… proved with an overwhelming amount of evidence that the various Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations have been promoting socialism since their inception,” agreed Allen. The Reece Committee hearings also revealed that individual Tax-exempt Foundations often act in concert with each other in order to amplify the enactment of their goals.
Congressman Reece made a final report on Tax-exempt Foundations, which was published by the government printing office on December 16, 1954. He said that there was clearly an interlock between The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, and some of its associate organizations, such as the Council on Foreign Relations and other foundations, with the State Department. And that, “[the] foundations and organizations would not dream of denying this interlock. They proudly note it in reports.”
Reece details the infiltration into the government, stating, “They [CFR/foundation interlock] have undertaken vital research projects for the [State] Department… [and have] fed a constant stream of personnel into the State Department trained by themselves or under programs which they have financed.”
Finally Reece concluded that “the Rockefeller Foundation, The Carnegie Corporation of New York, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, [are] using their enormous public funds to finance a one-sided approach to foreign policy and to promote it actively… by propaganda, and in the Government through infiltration. The power to do this comes out of the power of the vast funds employed.”
The report clearly states that the CFR with interlocked foundations have infiltrated the government. And that they use enormous sums of money to propagandize “educate” the public in support of the policies which they decide we should adopt. What congress has told us is that the government has been infiltrated by the CFR using multi-billion-dollar private bank accounts known as Tax-exempt Foundations.
This means that when a major U.S. policy is filtered down from the federal government, into the local and state governments, that it may originate from the CFR/foundation interlock. Specifically, this means that it has come from the big corporations and the international banks, of which the CFR and other Think Tanks are composed.
The “State within a state” that Justice Louis D. Brandeis warned about in 1915, was part of the beginning of a government within a government, or, as FBI Agent Dan Smoot calls it, The Invisible Government. Other notable components include: the emergence of the Federal Reserve System, and the creation and infiltration of the CFR, the Bilderbergers and the TC into the executive branch.
The Reece Committee found that, “When their activities spread into the field of the so-called, ‘social sciences’ or into other areas which our basic moral, social, economic, and governmental principles can be vitally affected, the public should be alerted to these activities and be made aware of the impact of foundation influence on our accepted way of life.”
“The power of the individual large foundations is enormous,” they concluded. “It can exercise various forms of patronage which carry with them elements of thought control… It is capable of invisible coercion through the power of its purse… This power to influence national policy is amplified tremendously when foundations act in concert. There is such a concentration of foundation power in the united States.”
“Every significant movement to destroy the American way of life has been directed and financed, in whole or in part, by tax-exempt organizations, which are entrenched in public opinion as benefactors of our society,” warned Smoot. And Wormser stated, “By engaging ‘public relations counselors’ (ethically, and even legally, a questionable practice), it can further create for itself a favorable press and enthusiastic publicity.”
“As I see it, the foundations… have, nonetheless, become the ‘agencies’ of the principal organization which they finance – the Council on Foreign Relations,” said Smoot. So according to Smoot’s conclusion, which is backed up by two congressional investigations, the tax-exempt giants are basically the private bank accounts of the interlocking Think Tanks.
Perloff arrived at the same conclusion when he noted, “The Rockefeller Foundation, for example, has poured millions into the Council on Foreign Relations, which in turn serves as the Establishment’s main bridge of influence to the U.S. government.” Wormser wrote that “Dr. Hutchins… [former] President of The Ford Foundation’s off-shoot, The Fund for the Republic, stated in 1948… that ‘world government is necessary, therefore it is – or must be made – possible.'” Finally, Smoot summarized, “[foundations] do finance the vast, complex, and powerful interlock of organizations devoted to a socialist one-world system.”
Writing about the results of other independent organizations which have investigated foundations, Wormser observed that, “ideas and organizations [supported] by tax-exempt foundations… had become the breeding ground for socialist and related political movements and action.” And that there were fears, “over the danger of foundation support of various undesirable concepts and movements having political implications.” These fears included, “the impairment of our national sovereignty; and even subversion. Hence the support by a majority in Congress of both the Cox and Reece Committee inquires.”
The Reece Committee also found that foundations tend to support “moral relativity” (the end justifies the means), and “social engineering” (mind-control), which are “detriment of our basic moral, religious, and governmental principles.” Wormser indicated that they also supply grants to intermediary organizations, which they’ve created, in order to carry out private (political) projects. These organizations are essentially public front organizations, which are presented to the public as being humanitarian in nature.
Interestingly, the brutal MKULTRA experiments, which were carried out in prestigious hospitals and universities, were funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. In his book, The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, Jonathan Marks wrote, “He [Dr. Cameron] headed Allan Memorial since 1943, when the Rockefeller foundation had donated funds to set up a psychiatric facility at McGill University. With continuing help from the Rockefellers, McGill had built a hospital known far beyond Canada’s borders…”
Summary
So, as these investigations and independent researchers have found, the true purpose for some of these foundations which are used by the financial elite, is to bankroll the installation of a one-world socialist dictatorship, and tax avoidance.
These investigations were launched because Congress and others were concerned that these foundations were backing subversive socialist political moments by using vast propaganda and the power of the purse.
These investigations were launched because Congress & others were concerned that these foundations were backing subversive socialist political moments by using vast propaganda & the power of the purse.
This appears to be exactly what the Hidden Evil is – part of a subversive political movement toward the installation of a socialist one-world government.
There can be no denying that these organizations have infiltrated the executive branch.
According to this information, it began with the documented overthrow of the true government in 1913 and continued with the appointment of members of elite Think Tanks into the executive branch.(*) First with the CFR, then the Bilderbergers and finally the Trilaterals. The infiltration by the Tax-exempt Foundations and the interlocking Think Tanks was done by the “power of the purse,” according to the Reece Committee hearings.
There is a heavy cross membership between those in control of the foundations and the elite societies. The Tax-exempt Complex is essentially their private multi-billion-dollar bank account. There is a strong interlock between the elite societies, the owners of mainstream media, the foundations, the Federal Reserve, Wall Street, the multinational corporations, and international banks. This cabal controls the United States and other NATO governments.
Once the deciding members of these Think Tanks settle on a policy, significant resources are pooled to promote the policy, which filters down to the local government. Opposition is met with ridicule by an array of organizations which the elite use to confound and discredit their critics. And in their own publications, they’ve made their intentions perfectly clear – a removal of the constitution and individual freedom, and the creation of a one-world government with them in control. This will be an absolute nightmare of a dictatorship.
On August 30, 2003, Congressman Ron Paul was addressing an audience near Austin Texas and was asked if there existed a “deceptive conspiracy to overthrow the American Republic” and “Bill Of Rights” and to “usher in a totalitarian World Government,” under the control of the UN.
He answered,
“Yes. I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of power, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congress, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Government, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship.”
Obviously, no presidential candidate is allowed to get close to the White House without being owned by this cabal. Although voting fraud probably does exist, the elections themselves are apparently scams, which offer the illusion of choice.
This explains why there have been no major positive changes throughout multiple administrations.
“Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of the day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of… [administrations] too plainly proves a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing us to slavery.”
-Thomas Jefferson
In his book, How the World Really Works, Alan B. Jones wrote,
“the elites who wish to set up their world dictatorship recognize their main enemy to be the great middle class of the United States, which, being made up of individuals who have acquired a little education, property, and independence, will fight strenuously to keep them.”
“The strategy,” says Jones, “of the elites is to squeeze the middle class to death by creating or exacerbating the major problems facing the society, including class warfare, crime, education, moral decay, etc., and then creating in response spurious governmental programs to “cure” the problems that they just created.”
What Jones is describing here is the financial elite’s consistent use of the Problem-Reaction-Solution formula.
“I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the Bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe.”
-Abraham Lincoln
Now that you have an understanding of the real power behind the throne, in upcoming chapters we’ll explore how these organizations have manipulated some major world events. But first let’s examine their control of mainstream information more closely.
This will help explain why you may never have heard of them, or the authentic version of how some historical events occurred.
Footnotes
* Former presidents, such as Garfield and Lincoln have attested to having running battles for the republic with the international banks and corporations. So some researchers may contend that this overthrow occurred at an earlier date, and they may be correct. Other authors suggest that despite winning the Revolutionary War, the United States was never truly removed from the grip of British Royalty. They too may be correct. But I listed 1913 as it was documented as an overthrow in a Congressional Record dated December 22, 1913, vol. 51, and echoed by Congressman Louis McFadden. This evidence was provided in the Federal Reserve section.