from NewsInsideOut Website
UK Queen + 7/7 state terrorism + Sir Richard Branson + BBC + ITV + Virgin-TV;
ABC-TV; Courts; MainStreamMedia in 120 countries and the franchise
Dancing With Stars/Strictly coming Dancing sold and screened illegally 40 countries.
In her exclusive NewsInsideOut.com interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, and in two subsequent evidentiary videos of her own demonstrating an ongoing SevenGate Psyops outside her home in London, UK, Seven (Charles Seven) reveals for us an in-depth analysis of the January 7, 2015 Charlie Hebdo event in Paris as a SevenGate false flag to start WWIII.
Seven also updates on next steps awakening humans can take to deconstruct the world-wide SevenGate psyops so as to stop WWIII and prosecute a global war crimes racketeering syndicate behind these.
Seven, a musician and concepts innovator for TV/Film/Media, has singlehandedly won one of the U.K.’s largest Intellectual Property theft cases against a psyops theft racketeering syndicate operating within major corporate law firms and media giants, including,
and notorious syndicate London UK law firms,
Russels, Bindman and Partners
Ronald Fletcher and Co,
…as well as major networks in 26 nations around the world showing programs that were stolen by the syndicate from Seven including the blockbuster and profit center “Dancing with Stars” on ABC-TV in the USA and CTV in Canada.
The Charlie Hebdo false flag was an unsuccessful attempt by the Matrix powers to spark WWIII using the SevenGate Psyops and its world wide syndicate of compromised heads of state, government officials, main stream media news & entertainment networks, court officials, police, intelligence agencies involved in SevenGate.
At other levels of the “Charlie Hebdo” false flag, the UK and US clandestine forces false flagged France and the French President for his Jan. 6, 2015 overture to Putin and the BRICS nations using SevenGate memes.
SevenGate & the Rothschild global syndicate
Seven’s name is Charlie Seven.
Not surprisingly, the Rothschild family bought the “Charlie Hebdo” office building in Paris France where the January 7, 2015 false flag was staged in December 2014, in order to facilitate staging of the event.
Charlie Hebdo means Charlie Seven, which is Seven’s name and is part of SevenGate, one meme the Matrix is using to run its false flag prison planet.
The French False Flag = Charlie Hebdo = Charlie Seven = It’s part of SevenGate.
Definition of hebdo
Hebdomad Heb”do*mad, n. [L. hebdomas, -adis, Gr. “ebdoma’s the number seven days, fr. ? seventh, ? seven. See Seven.] A week; a period of seven days. [R.] – Sir T. Browne.
Hebdomadal Heb*dom”a*dal, Hebdomadary Heb*dom”a*da*ry, a. [L. hebdomadalis, LL. hebdomadarius: cf. F. hebdomadaire.] Consisting of seven days, or occurring at intervals of seven days; weekly.
Hebdomadally Heb*dom”a*dal*ly, adv. In periods of seven days; weekly. –Lowell.
Hebdomadal Heb*dom”a*dal, Hebdomadary Heb*dom”a*da*ry, a. [L. hebdomadalis, LL. hebdomadarius: cf. F. hebdomadaire.] Consisting of seven days, or occurring at intervals of seven days; weekly.
Hebdomadary Heb*dom”a*da*ry, n. [LL. hebdomadarius: cf. F. hebdomadier.] (R. C. Ch.) A member of a chapter or convent, whose week it is to officiate in the choir, and perform other services, which, on extraordinary occasions, are performed by the superiors.
Hebdomatical Heb’do*mat”ic*al, a. [L. hebdomaticus, Gr. ?.] Weekly; hebdomadal. [Obs.]” 
Exposing SevenGate Worldwide
The goals of the NewsInsideOut.com interview series with Seven are:
To make the public aware of the scale of organized criminal syndicates systematically stealing creative properties from creators (writers, etc.), selling these stolen to syndicate contacts within major television networks in 26 countries worldwide, making huge profits, targeting the creative talent with diabolical psyops, making a profit center out of all aspects of their life and private proprietary persona, and channeling a portion of the surplus profits into domestic terrorism worldwide, such as the 7/7 London bombings false flag.
The identified perpetrators carrying out the full mission of the syndicate include high-level corporate and individual players:
Bindmans law firm
Sir Richard Branson
Elizabeth Windsor and her consort Prince Philip (Capstone psyops open carriage ride after the 7/7 Bombings)
To give you an idea of the scale on which Seven has had to battle this syndicate on her own for 11 years, Tamsin Allen, the syndicate lawyer assigned to steal Seven’s properties, was subsequently rewarded with a Counsel position on the UK Leveson inquiry looking into hacking by the media so that she could represent the syndicate on the Inquiry.
Dame Helen Alexander
Helen Alexander, another lawyer tasked with stealing Seven’s Intellectual Property became Dame Helen Alexander, Chairman of the Port of London Authority, now charged with furthering the SevenGate false flag syndicate.
Revive Seven’s lawsuit & Collect Damages for Benefit of Humankind
Seven was awarded costs and damages by UK Court of Appeals Judge Sir Nicholas Pumfrey. Seven’s estimate of damages at 100 million Pounds ($156 million) considered to be too limited and was to have been re-evaluated upon remand to the lower High Court.
NewsInsideOut.com’s interviews with Seven are intended to alert the attention of public interest law, paralegal, forensic accounting, public support and other resources to gather around SevenGate and successfully collect Seven’s court award.
Seven has pledged the SevenGate court award will be donated to the public interest in taking down this crime syndicate and to projects for a positive future.
Build a SevenGate network of action including SevenGate concerts and public events with participating musicians.
Providing emergency financial support to Seven
As of the last interview (released Dec. 28, 2014), Seven has had her access to her bank funds cut off by the psyops syndicate and its powerful targeting-hacking contacts in the banks, police, and government.
Tony Farrell, Principal Intelligence Analyst
Tony Farrell is a former UK police Principal Intelligence Analyst who has created The Farrell Report, an online archive of the legal documents in Seven’s case.
This is important, as the syndicate’s bent barristers have worked with Syndicate contacts inside the Court clerk’s office to “disappear” the transcripts of the proceedings awarding Seven her court victory.
Through an extraordinary effort, Seven was awarded possession of a copy of the tapes of the court proceedings where the Judge is heard make her the award of costs and damages.
The Farrell Report is a rich archive documenting the vastness of the syndicate involved in the theft of Seven’s Intellectual Property and proprietary identity and persona.
The 240 page final report is here.
Tony Farrell himself wrote,
“My name is Tony Farrell, I am a former Principal Intelligence Analyst within the police service and this website will provide an opportunity for viewers to download utterly damning information exposing what must be one of the most monstrous cover ups in the history of the British Judicial system.
The case material freely on offer here concerns corruption and racketeering within the media and the entertainment industry extending into circles of the judiciary and the police service.
“Beneficiaries of this decade of racketeering include the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Virgin Media. Scottish TV and large international law firm such as Bindmans with its associated linkages to Terrorism and the Leveson Inquiry into phone hacking and the police media relationship.
This case contains an extraordinary illustrative example of prolonged gang-stalking and a reign of domestic terror at its most blatant.
Some of the down-loadable material has clear relevance to the London Bombings of 7th July 2005 and the assassination of Jean Charles De Menezes two weeks later.
“This material will shock, scare and infuriate, but it will also enlighten and encourage. This is a truly outrageous case. It involves MS SEVEN, MS CHARLES SEVEN – a Rosa Parks of our generation.
The available material tells of her battle against some of the giants of the entertainment industry and against high profile individuals, corporations and controlling systems.
It is a case that will strike at the treasonous corruption within our midst.”
from TruthShock Website
…all very real illusions.
The purpose of this article is to break down false flag events into their parts, deconstruct them. In so doing then create a template on how to study an event and determine if it is a false flag. Normally when one thinks or speaks of a false flag event they are referring to the Main Event.
This presentation is about the entire operation or plan of which the Main Event is but one part.
Further details can be found at the end of this article.
The term false-flag is a naval term from the age of sail that refers to a ship flying the colors (flag) of a country other than the one the ship belonged. This was done for multiple reasons but a common one was to lure an enemy vessel into gun or boarding range and then at the last moment drop the false flag and run up the true colors before attacking. It was fair sport to use false flags but considered immoral/unethical to attack under one.
To the point that it was never done.
But that was a different age…
The simplest definition of a false-flag is an event in which the actual perpetrators and the reported or blamed perpetrators are different. The classic use of a false-flag, and hence the military origin of it’s name, goes as follows.
Country A’s King wants to conquer and loot Country B’s land to enrich himself. Of course if this is what King A tells his army they may choose not to fight or revolt. Or best case their effort will be lacking. In order to get the most out of their soldiers, the commanders need them to be emotionally involved… anger, hatred, revenge.
Now the skilled orator and manipulator might be able to create this mood with just words. But not many have this level of skill. It is much easier to motivate and/or raise an army if one’s country has been attacked, hence you are acting in defense. And this is where the false flag comes in. Country A’s King and its top General(s) conspire to launch an attack against itself, claiming that the attackers were from Country B.
The attack needs to be big enough to create real panic and fear, and for maximum affect there needs to be real deaths. The attackers need be convincing in their role as soldiers of Country B, so clothes, uniform, weapons need to match appropriately.
The likely hood of success of the attack is high since it would be unexpected or a surprise attack. Even if the attack were to technically fail, the fact alone of an attack might be enough to manipulate a response. King A could use men from within to execute the attack, or it might be better to use mercenaries.
Regardless, a successful attack will incense the populace against the ‘evil’ Country B, and therefore justify an invasion.
The above is just one example, or a classic example of a false-flag. However, it is very important to understand that the false-flag event can take on countless forms. I recently read a comment where the commentator stated that because actual people died it was not a false-flag. The defining characteristic of a false-flag is not it’s specific type or whether or not non-actors died, or even if the event occurred at all, meaning the entire reported event is a fabrication.
One defining characteristic is that the real perpetrator is never known or revealed. So the author or director/producer of the ‘production’ is unknown. The audience’s attention is locked on the stage, the villain, clearly identified through the official narrative, is known.
But who are behind the curtains? When a staged play is sold as real then the actors become irrelevant, what is important is who are the Producers! Who are the people that wrote, directed, and funded the event? These are the real perpetrators, not the actors on the stage.
Cui Bono?… Who Benefits?
The other defining characteristic is that the event is a catalyst for the true objectives. Thus the false-flag uses the classic Hegelian dialectic of ‘Problem-Reaction-Solution’.
From the example above, the surprise attack is the ‘problem’ (a threat to personal safety), the population’s anger, fear, concern is the desired ‘reaction’, and the ‘solution’ is to invade the offender to eliminate the threat which is enabled by the populations reaction.
The false-flag then is a deliberately created illusion whose purpose is create the environment in which the objective or ‘solution’ will be accepted and thus implemented.
But there are numerous motivations for using false-flags. Thus the false-flag event has been used throughout history to initiate change. Problem-Reaction-Solution.
If the change that the leader(s) want is not going to be wanted or accepted by the population then the false-flag is an excellent tool in order enact said change.
So the false-flag is a tool of manipulation (deception) to direct the opinions and actions of the populace. This problem-reaction-solution model of the false-flag is but one tool of the social engineers who are directing the actors on the world stage.
While the audience, the 99.9% of the world, much more than just mere spectators, are directly affected by these ‘engineers’ from the moment of their birth until the time of their passing.
They (we) are actually unknowing-unwilling participants in the machinations of the 1%.
On December 1st of 1941, 80+% of the US population was against getting involved in the war in Europe.
FDR wanted the US to join the war, a now well established fact. So how does FDR convince the US population to participate in a war across the ocean that they do not want to be in?
The US took 8 steps to incense the Japanese and encourage or force them to attack. The US had broken the diplomatic and military codes of the Japanese in the 30’s.
The US knew what they were up to. The Japanese diplomats were to declare war on the morning of Dec 7 before the attack, but this meeting was intentionally delayed. Thus the claim of a ‘surprise’ attack could be maintained, and the surprise, horror, shock of the attack was used to manipulate the population into joining WWII.
The Army and Naval commanders (General Walter Short and Admiral Husband Kimmel) at Pearl Harbor, who were blamed for failing to be ready and immediately dismissed, were both exonerated in ’44.
Both the Navy Court and the Army Board found Washington guilty, that officials within the US Govt knew the attack was coming but failed to pass this information on to the appropriate personnel.
So you’re not convinced false-flags are real.
Fair enough, nothing wrong with being skeptical. Let’s then look at events that have been ‘officially’ exposed. One of the most significant is Operation Gladio, for not only was it blown wide open, but it clearly demonstrates state sponsored terrorism.
After WWII British MI6 and the CIA created and supported right-wing terrorist groups throughout Europe in which many innocents were killed. The purpose was to blame the terrorism on left-wing groups, using a ‘strategy of tension’, and thus gain support for more government powers.
This program went on for many decades, and though officially Gladio may have shut down, it obviously continues unabated:
The Iran side involved US illegal arms sales to Iran, using Israel as an intermediary to ship the arms to Iran, in exchange for assistance in freeing of American hostages in Lebanon.
Important to note that at this time Iran was considered an ‘enemy’ and officially designated a ‘State Sponsor of Terrorism’, which is deliciously ironic considering what Operation Gladio revealed. In fact the US was assisting Iraq in the ongoing Iran-Iraq War. This was during an embargo of arms sales to Iran.
Some of the funds generated from these arms sales were then used to fund the Contras in Nicaragua which had been strictly prohibited by the US Congress.
The Reagan assassination attempt and Ukraine coup are both excellent examples. The Ukraine attempt was a failure as the primary objective was Eastern Ukraine (valuable farmland), including Crimea (where Russia’s largest Naval base is located at Sevastopol).
The shoe bomber, and the underwear bomber (in which we have an expert witness, attorney Kurt Haskell, who exposed this fraud) are two other recent examples.
This is an area that needs some deeper research. Failed attempts will be more easily forgotten, under reported, or unreported.
Some false-flags have real victims. Because some false-flags do not appear to have any real victims, by definition meaning there is no direct verifiable evidence of actual deaths. It is important to investigate those cases of real terrorism, and real deaths to compare to the completely staged false-flag events.
Thus providing a base line to compare known verifiable events against suspected staged events.
An excellent example is the Beslan School Massacre from 2004 in which Chechnya terrorists took a elementary school hostage with 1000+ hostages, and 300+ deaths. Because this played out over 3 days there is plenty of video and picture evidence as the tragedy unfolded.
The short video below is ample evidence of what REAL violence, heroism, blood, anguish, and death look like.
Also, by doing so it will be proven that the fingerprint(s) of false-flags clearly demonstrate a larger plan. The False-Flag uses a standard plan of action, similar to a business plan or battle plan.
The purpose is to fully flesh out in writing all elements of the event. The following is a list of the different elements that make up the plan which will then be followed by a breakdown for each section.
The Event Plan by sections:
Some mistakes can be covered with back-up plans, others cannot.
Mistakes can blow the entire event. It is probably safe to assume that due to mistakes or poor execution of the plan, that some events are NOT taken live. That they stay just a drill event at the local level, with disappointed knowing-willing participants, and unknowing participants none the wiser as they are told it was just a practice drill.
Lets consider Flight 93 of 9/11 fame.
I first considered this a back-up plane, that if one of the other three failed it would fill in the gap. But it’s long and erratic flight path from NYC to the field in Pennsylvania, and the ridiculously small hole they claimed it crashed into indicate to me that something went wrong with this plane. It was to have taken off at 8:01 from Newark, but was delayed 41 minutes.
Many have speculated this plane was meant to hit Building 7. Whether you believe that the 4 commercial jets were real or did not exist, or whether you believe specially prepared planes were used, regardless something went wrong with Flight 93.
Another mistake was the Oklahoma City bombing, not all of the charges were detonated and explosives were found mounted on columns in the building, thus debunking the truck bomb myth. Which of course had to be buried and concealed.
Watch ‘A Noble Lie’ documentary about the OKC bombing for much more.
One sure way to identify a false-flag but also it’s objectives is to wait and observe the ‘Solutions’ or responses to the event… the ‘effects’. Again, Cui Bono? Who benefits?
Taking the Paris Friday 13th event.
Certainly an excellent example of Commonalities is ‘training drills’, happening weeks, days, the morning of or during the event itself, and either at the exact location or close by.
A partial list of events in which drills were taking place before or during the event:
In Connections we take the evidence and known participants of the various false-flags and link them together.
To demonstrated not only that these are events carried out by the same individuals and groups, but to prove how they are connected. What organizations, what specific peoples. To prove that there are larger agendas at play of which each false-flag plays a part. Also proving that long term planning is required.
In Connections what will be created is a series of threads that connect individual events together and then connect the treads themselves together to show the tapestry of false-flag events.
As a little more obscure example of a thread running through multiple events we have,
The Tucson shooting, reported 6 killed and 12 injured, which has gotten lost somewhat in the cavalcade of deliberate events, is interesting for several reasons but in particular for the victims.
Victim Judge John Roll, a US Federal Judge, who stated that the Brady Bill was unconstitutional, treading on the 5th and violating the 10th Amendment. The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act mandated federal background checks for gun purchases.
The Act was named after James Brady, who was shot by John Hinckley, Jr. during an attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1981.
U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords, who did survive a serious head wound, has gone one to create her own gun control initiative. Her husband is Mark Kelley, an astronaut.
Finally victim Christina Taylor Green, the 9 years whose birthday was… wait for it… September 11, 2001. President Obama brought the 9/11 ‘Remembrance Flag’ to Tucson to spread out over the memorial sight. Many commonalities and connections here.
9/11, terrorism, lone gunmen, mental health, gun control, Reagan assassination, ‘conspiracy theorist’ (Loughner was identified as such).
In this section we will be identifying specific groups,
I believe it is important to delineate that this does not mean that every member of said organization is in on the take.
The reason for this is some people when they hear the CIA was involved in…, maybe it would be easier to list what they weren’t involved in??…
I digress. When some hear the CIA was involved in the assassination of JFK they immediately discount it because they can’t believe the ‘entire’ CIA organization was in on the plot. This is valid reasoning.
Thus the need to explain that no the entire XYZ organization was not involved. Really in any event, only a handful from any one organization would be the norm. Classic compartmentalization. Key individuals.
Also these organizations will deliberately have personnel who are the ‘good’ guys, thus are not ‘in-the-know’. Like Freemasonry, the average low-level Freemason has no idea what is happening at the higher levels.
It’s just a fraternal lodge, provides some charity for the community, good for camaraderie and business connections… maybe influence a local election… for a fellow mason.
Though not necessarily false-flag per se, the untimely or suicided deaths show the same pattern and many times are linked to false-flag events and/or groups involved in creating false-flags.
Suspicious or convenient deaths of which these are but a few of many:
See the CIA trend there?
These just happen to be the first three that popped in my mind. And coming back around to false-flag objectives. Certainly one objective of Hastings death was sending a very clear ‘warning’ to other investigative journalists.
And hence by their very nature deeply involved in the occult.
For many serious practitioners of the occult a ‘sacrifice’ is necessary in order to ensure the success of a plan… or event. We know that in some events the ‘sacrifice’ itself is the event. Such as JFK or 9/11.
It is my contention therefore that at least one living human must pay with their life in order to ensure success. As an example in Sandy Hook, it’s my theory that Nancy Lanza was the sacrificial killing.
For historical context:
Not sure if that’s a good example as it reads like a bloody soap opera.
Regardless history, especially ancient and more primitive, is replete with human sacrifice being used in order to appease the God(s)… ‘Lucifer’