Electronic Harassment and Gang Stalking – Audio and Text

“We need a program of psychosurgery and political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated.

“The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective.

“Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electrical stimulation of the brain.”

Dr. Jose Delgado

(MKULTRA experimenter who demonstrated a radio-controlled bull on CNN in 1985)
Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical School
Congressional Record No. 26, Vol. 118, February 24, 1974

Furthermore, since the perpetrators constantly work to prevent the public from knowing anything about gang stalking and electronic harassment, evidence is obtainable with great difficulty, and often the only evidence is of lower quality than would be accepted for a scientific treatise.

In short, everything in this article represents a struggle against immense odds. We ask readers to understand this and hope that those who are not under electronic attack and surveillance will try through independent channels to find better quality proof.

Up to Contents

II.   INTRODUCTION

Electronic harassment and control technology had it’s start in the
1950s, as an obscure branch of the CIA’s MKULTRA project group.
Just as organized crime is not stopped by hearings and court cases,
neither did this originally obscure branch of MKULTRA activity, when
the institutional/drug/child abuse phases were exposed by the U.S.
Senate’s Church-Inouye hearings in the late 1970s.  No criminal
proceedings followed, and only two civil law suits (Orlikow and
Bonacci) have succeeded.

This assembly of unclassified and commercial literature is to show
investigators and concerned citizens that in spite of the tightest
possible information blackout imposed in the early 1970s, enough of
the classified electronic harassment and control technology has
leaked out to show that significant classified accomplishments are
overwhelmingly likely, and in need of disclosure, here at the end of
the 20th century.

It is hoped that government and media, who have shied away from this
topic for decades, preferring the warm fuzzy feelings that “this can’t
be true”, will read about the unclassified and commercial devices and
understand the implications of continued turning the other way.

Up to Contents

III.  E-HARASSMENT EFFECTS

Since government-backed electronic harassment and control is classified
at the highest levels in all technologically capapble governments, the
description of effects is taken from the personal experiences of the
“2,000 or so” known gang stalking with electronic harassment targets.
The experimentees without exception report that once the harassment
begins, in virtually all cases it continues for life.  It continues in
every city, state, and country the target moves to.  It continues in
prisons and hospitals, even when the target is dying of cancer.

Many targets are young seniors, some in their 70s and 80s.

Some have children and the children are often subjected to the same
“testing” as their parent(s).  Pets are not only tortured, but even
killed, painfully and violently.

The effects pattern:

This article is about unclassified/commercial technologies which can
produce some of the effects of the harassment equipment:

– All harassment consists of unique, carefully engineered-unprovable
events to produce psychological stress in the victim.  There are
no events which do not fit that apparent purpose.
– In every series of stress event type, ONE introductory event of
very high energy/effect is staged.  The obvious purpose is to be
certain the victim KNOWS this is external harassment, and not just
“bad luck”.  From that time forward, the perpetrators appear to
apply “Pavlovian training” so that they can get the victim to “jump”
(or react in some way) to the same effect at a tiny fraction of the
initial “introductory” event.
– This type of harassment started during the Cold War, and shows every
characteristic of military and intelligence psychological warfare
operations.
– This type of harassment points to CONTROL of the test subject.
Endlessly repeated words generated inescapably within the skull
are just one hypnosis-like experience.
– The total number and type of crimes which make up gang stalking and
electronic harassment simply could not take place without cover
being supplied by government.  Bizarre court decisions in which the
target is forced into involuntary mental health treatment and a
criminal spouse (for example, a pedophile father discovered “doing”
his own child) clearly show that gang stalking and electronic
harassment are heavily protected by all levels of government and
the medical establishment.

The effect types categorized:

Here is a list of most of the common effects.  It is not exhaustive,
but is intended to show the reader how the perpetrators’ pallette
of stress effects is broken down.  Indent levels are used to show
categories and sub-categories:

1.  Invasive At-a-Distance Body Effects (including mind)

    a.  Sleep deprivation and fatigue
i.  Silent but instantaneous application of “electronic
caffeine” signal, forces awake and keeps awake
ii. Loud noise from neighbours, often SYNCHRONIZED
to attempts to fall asleep
iii.Precision-to-the-second “allowed sleep” and “forced
awakening”; far too precise and repeated to be natural
iv. Daytime “fatigue attacks”, can force the victim to sleep
and/or weaken the muscles to the point of collapse
b.  Audible Voice to Skull (V2S)
i.  Delivered remotely, at a distance
ii. Made to appear as emanating from thin air
iii.Voices or sound effects only the victim can hear
c.  Inaudible Voice to Skull (Silent Sound)
i.  Delivered by apparent at a distance radio signal;
manifested by sudden urges to do something/go somewhere
you would not otherwise want to; silent (ultrasonic)
hypnosis is possible
ii. Programming hypnotic “triggers” – i.e. specific phrases
or other cues which cause specific involuntary actions
d.  Violent muscle triggering (flailing of limbs)
i.  Leg or arm jerks to violently force awake and keep awake
ii. Whole body jerks, as if body had been hit by large jolt
of electricity
iii.Violent shaking of body; seemingly as if on a vibrating
surface but where surface is in reality not vibrating
e.  Precision manipulation of body parts (slow, specific purpose)
i.  Manipulation of hands, forced to synchronize with closed-eyes
but FULLY AWAKE vision of previous day; very powerful and
coercive, not a dream
ii. Slow bending almost 90 degrees BACKWARDS of one toe at a
time or one finger at a time
iii.Direct at-a-distance control of breathing and vocal cords;
including involuntary speech
iv. Spot blanking of memory, more than normal forgetfulness
f.  Reading said-silently-to-self thoughts
i.  Engineered skits where your thoughts are spoken to you
by strangers on street or events requiring knowledge of
what you were thinking
ii. Real time reading subvocalized words, as while the victim
reads a book, and BROADCASTING those words to nearby people
who form an amazed audience around the victim
g.  Direct application of pain to body parts
i.  Hot-needles-deep-in-flesh sensation
ii. Electric shocks (no wires whatsoever applied)
iii.Powerful and unquenchable itching, often applied precisely
when victim attempts to do something of a delicate or
messy nature
iv. “Artificial fever”, sudden, no illness present
v.  Sudden racing heartbeat, relaxed situation
h.  Surveillance and tracking
i.  Rapping under your feet as you move about your apartment,
on ceiling of apartment below
ii. Thru wall radar used to monitor starting and stopping
of your urination – water below turned on and off
in sync with your urine stream

2.  Invasive Physical Effects at a Distance, non-body

    a.  Stoppage of power to appliances (temporary, breaker ON)
b.  Manipulation of appliance settings
c.  Temporary failures that “fix themselves”
d.  Flinging of objects, including non-metallic
e.  Precision manipulation of switches and controls
f.  Forced, obviously premature failure of appliance or
parts

3.  External Stress-Generating “Skits”

    a.  Participation of strangers, neighbours, and in some cases
close friends and family members in harassment
i.  Rudeness for no cause
ii. Tradesmen always have “problems”, block your car, etc.
iii.Purchases delayed, spoiled, or lost at a high rate
iv. Unusually loud music, noise, far beyond normal
b.  Break-ins/sabotage at home
i.  Shredding of clothing
ii. Destruction of furniture
iii.Petty theft
iv. Engineered failures of utilities
c.  Sabotage at work
i.  Repetitive damage to furniture
ii. Deletion/corruption of computer files
iii.Planting viruses which could not have come from
your computer usage pattern
iv. Delivered goods delayed, spoiled, or lost at a high rate
v.  Spreading of rumors, sabotage to your working reputation
vi. Direct sabotage and theft of completed work; tradesmen
often involved and showing obvious pleasure

Illustration of the bodily effects

Up to Contents 

IV.   MAJOR TECHNOLOGY CLASSES

These technology classes are for the UNclassified and commercial
equipment which can emulate the “real” classified electronic
harassment equipment.

Effect section 2, “Invasive Physical Effects at-a-Distance”, clearly
establishes the existence of remote precision manipulation of objects
which is far beyond the capabilities of unclassified and commercial
equipment at the time of writing.

REMOTE PHYSICAL MANIPULATION is not covered in this article, but
the reader should know that both NASA and IEEE have noted successes in
creating very small antigravity effects (which are not due to simple
magnetism.)

TRANSMISSION METHODS FOR NEURO-EFFECTIVE SIGNALS:

    – pulsed microwave (i.e. like radar signals)
– ultrasound and voice-FM (transmitted through the air)

While transmission of speech, dating from the early 1970s,
was the first use of pulsed microwave, neuro-effective
signals of as yet unknown type can now cause many other
nerve groups to become remotely actuated.  At time of
writing, that technology appears to be classified.

PAVLOVIAN HYPNOTIC TRIGGERS:

A [Pavlovian] hypnotic trigger is a phrase or any other
sensory cue which the victim is programmed to involuntarily
act on in a certain way.  The 50s-70s MKULTRA survivors can
still be triggered from programming done decades ago.  A name
“manchurian candidate”, from a novel by John Marks, is used
to describe a person who carries Pavlovian triggers.

One of the main goals of the institutional/drug/child
abuse phases of the CIA MKULTRA atrocities (1950’s through
1970’s) was to implant triggers using a “twilight
state” (half-conscious) medication and tape recorded
hypnosis.  The ultimate goal was to have the acting out
of Pavlovian triggers erased from the victim’s memory.

Using a combination of Joseph Sharp voice to skull and
Lowery Silent Sound technologies, these triggers can now
be planted with the subject being unaware, or just barely
aware of a very high tone in his or her hearing sense.

THROUGH-WALL SURVEILLANCE METHODS:

So-called “millimeter wave” scanning.  This method uses the
very top end of the microwave radio signal spectrum just
below slightly into the infra-red frequency region.  To view
small objects or people clearly, the highest frequency that
will penetrate non-conductive or poorly- conductive walls is
used.  Millimeter wave scanning radar can be used in two modes:

    – passive (no signal radiated, uses background
radiation already in the area to be scanned,
totally UNdetectable)
– active (low power millimeter wave “flashlight”
attached to the scanner just as a conventional
light mounted on a camcorder), or, the use of
archaeological ground penetrating radar

THOUGHT READING:

Thought reading can be classed as a “through wall
surveillance” technology.  Thought reading, in the
unclassified/commercial realm, can be broken down as
follows:

    – magnetic skull-proximity or throat (vocal cord
proximity) reading
– EEG (electroencephalogram) interpretation,
particularly by way of inside the brain pickup
wires

The ability to read and display what the eyes are
seeing using implanted pickups is one form of
technology almost the same as “thought reading”.

BRAIN ENTRAINMENT:

    The reverse of biofeedback.  Those low frequency electrical
brain rhythms which are characteristics of various moods
and states of sleep can not only be read out using
biofeedback equipment or EEG machines, but using radio,
sound, contact electrodes, or flashing lights, the moods
and sleep states can be generated or at least encouraged
using brain entrainment devices.

Brain entrainment signals cannot carry voice, which is a
much higher frequency range.  Brain entrainment can,
however, be used to “set up” a target to make him/her more
susceptible to hypnosis by inducing a relaxed and/or
sleeping state.  (This is the same state used by remote
viewers.)

These major technology classes can produce some of the observed
electronic harassment effects, FROM HIDING AND UNDETECTABLY, with the
exception of remote physical manipulation.

IMPLANTATION is sometimes used to assist the above technologies
but with current devices.  Implants do not appear to be required,
based on large numbers of people who have had no surgery, no
unexplained wounds, and no missing time.

Diagram showing the overall method, based entirely on unclassified
1974 technology, of how SILENT hypnosis may be transmitted to a
target without the target’s being aware.  This technique is probably
the most insidious, because it allows months and years of programming
and Pavlovian trigger-setting, while the target cannot resist
because the target can’t hear the programming.

Up to Contents 

V.    PULSED MICROWAVE

Pulsed microwave voice-to-skull (or other-sound-to-skull) transmission
was discovered during World War II by radar technicians who found they
could hear the buzz of the train of pulses being transmitted by radar
equipment they were working on.  This phenomenon has been studied
extensively by Dr. Allan Frey, whose work has been published in a number
of reference books.

What Dr. Frey found was that single pulses of microwave could be heard
by some people as “pops” or “clicks”, while a train of uniform pulses
could be heard as a buzz, without benefit of any type of receiver.

Dr. Frey also found that a wide range of frequencies, as low as 125 MHz
(well below microwave) worked for some combination of pulse power and
pulse width.  Detailed unclassified studies mapped out those frequencies
and pulse characteristics which are optimum for generation of “microwave
hearing”.

Very significantly, when discussing electronic harassment, is the
fact that the PEAK PULSE POWER required is modest – something like
0.3 watts per square centimeter of skull surface, and this power level
is only applied for a very small percentage of each pulse’s cycle time.
0.3 watts/sq cm is about what you get under a 250 watt heat lamp at
a distance of one meter.  It is not a lot of power.

When you take into account that the pulse train is OFF (no signal) for
most of each cycle, the average power is so low as to be nearly
undetectable.

Frequencies that act as voice-to-skull carriers are not single freq-
uencies, as, for example TV or cell phone channels are.  Each sensitive
frequency is actually a range or “band” of frequencies.  A technology
used to reduce both interference and detection is called “spread
spectrum”.  Spread spectrum signals have the carrier frequency “hop”
around within a specified band.

Unless a receiver “knows” the hop schedule in advance, there is virtually
no chance of receiving or detecting a coherent readable signal.  Spectrum
analyzers, used for detection, are receivers with a screen.  A spread
spectrum signal received on a spectrum analyzer appears as just more
“static” or noise.

My organization was delighted to find the actual method of the first
successful UNclassified voice to skull experiment in 1974, by Dr.
Joseph C. Sharp, then at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.

Dr. Sharp’s basic method is shown in Appendix PM6, below.  A Frey-
type audible pulse was transmitted every time the voice waveform
passed down through the zero axis, a technique easily duplicated by
ham radio operators who build their own equipment.

A pattern seems to be repeated where research which could be used for
mind control starts working, the UNclassified researchers lose funding,
and in some cases their notes have been confiscated, and no further
information on that research track is heard in the unclassified press.

Pulsed microwave voice-to-skull research is one such track.

Illustration showing the principle behind pulsed microwave voice-to-skull

Appended articles:

PM1 http://www.raven1.net/lida.htm, photo and description of
the old medical device, the Korean War vintage LIDA machine, a
radio frequency BRAIN ENTRAINMENT device developed by Soviet Russia
as a drugless tranquilizer.  BRAIN ENTRAINMENT IS INCLUDED IN THE
RADIO FREQUENCY SECTION BECAUSE THE MOST INSIDIOUS METHOD OF BRAIN
ENTRAINMENT IS TO SILENTLY USE RADIO SIGNALS.

PM2 http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm, Human Auditory System Response
To Modulated Electromagnetic Energy, Allan H. Frey, General Electric
Advanced Electronics Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

PM3 http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm, NASA technical report
abstract stating that speech-to-skull is feasible

PM4 http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htm, DOD/EPA small business
initiative (SBIR) project to study the UNclassified use of voice-to-
skull technology for military uses.  (The recipient, Science and Engin-
eering Associates, Albuquerque NM, would not provide me details on the
telephone)

PM5 http://www.raven1.net/bioamp.htm, Excerpts, Proceedings of
Joint Symposium on Interactions of Electromagnetic Waves with
Biological Systems, 22nd General Assembly of the International
Union of Radio Science, Aug 25 – Sep 2, 1987, Tel Aviv, Israel
SHOWS BIOLOGICAL AMPLIFICATION OF EM SIGNALS, pointing to relative
ease with which neuro-electromagnetic signals can trigger effects

PM6 http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm, Excerpt, Dr. Don R.
Justesen, neuropsychological researcher, describes Dr. Joseph C.
Sharp’s successful transmission of WORDS via a pulse-rate-
modulated microwave transmitter of the Frey type.

PM7 http://www.raven1.net/russ.htm, FOIA article circulated among
U.S. agencies describing the Russian TV program “Man and Law”,
which gives a glimpse into the Russian mind control efforts.
(Dr. Igor Smirnov, a major player, was used as a consultant to
the FBI at the Waco Branch Davidian standoff.)

Up to Contents 

VI.   ULTRASOUND AND VOICE-FM

Ultrasound is vibration of the air, a liquid, or a solid, above the
upper limit of human hearing which is roughly 15,000 Hz in adults.
Voice-FM uses a tone at or near that upper limit, and the speaker’s
voice VARIES the frequency slightly.  Either a “tinnitus-like sound”
or nothing is heard by the target.

Ultrasound/voice-FM can be transmitted in these ways:

– directly through the air using “air type transducers”
– directly to the brain using a modulated microwave pulse train
– through the air by piggybacking an ultrasound message on top
of commercial radio or television

The use of commercial radio or television requires that the input signal
at the transmitter be relatively powerful, since radio and TV receivers
are not designed to pass on ultrasound messages.  However, the average
radio and TV receiver does not simply stop ultrasound, rather, the ability
to pass ultrasound messages “rolls off”, i.e. decreases, as the frequency
is increased.

Today’s radios and TVs can carry enough ultrasound messaging to be “heard”
by the human brain (though not the ear) to be effective in conveying
hypnosis.  This was proven by the U.S. military forces in the Gulf War.

Ultrasound’s (and voice-FM’s) main advantage in mind electronic harassment
work is that it can carry VERBAL hypnosis, more potent than simple
biorhythm entrainment.

The brain CAN “hear” and understand this “inaudible voice”, while the ear
and conscious hearing cannot.  Once you can convey hypnotic suggestion
which cannot be consciously heard, you have eliminated a major barrier to
the subject’s acceptance of the words being transmitted.

In previous decades, “subliminal advertising” using voice and images at
normal frequencies were “time sliced” into an apparently normal radio or
TV broadcast.  This apparently did not work well, and now voice-FM
“subliminal learning tapes” commercially available have superseded the
old time slice method.

Illustration showing the operation of “silent sound” with the human
hearing system, using near-ultrasound, FREQUENCY MODULATED voice

One method for projecting either audible voice or voice-FM over long distances, virtually undectable if line of sight, is the “acoustic heterodyne” or “HyperSonic Sound” system, patented by American Technologies Corporation, San Diego CA, http://www.atcsd.com

Illustration showing the principle of an ultrasound projection system
capable of true ventriloquism at a distance, by American Technologies
Corporation (licensor), Akai Japan (licensee)

Appended articles:

US1

http://www.raven1.net/silsoun2.htm, ITV Silent Sound report
with comments by Judy Wall, Editor, Resonance, newsletter of MENSA’s
bioelectromagnetic special interest group

US2

http://www.raven1.net/commsolo.htm, an article by Judy Wall
outlining instances of UNclassified, openly-admitted-to, electronic
mind control operations by government agencies.

US3

http://www.raven1.net/armyparw.htm, an SBIR (small business
initiative contract) which clearly shows intent to use ultrasound as
an anti-personnel weapon, including one-man portability and with power
to kill

US4

http://www.raven1.net/ssnz.htm, a commercial New Zealand company,
Altered States Ltd., sells tapes which perform “suggestions” (i.e.
hypnosis but not called such) using the Lowery patent voice-FM
method, to hypnotize without the subject being aware.  This is a key
feature of neuro-electromagnetic involuntary experiments.

US5

http://www.raven1.net/acouspot.htm, a page originally from the
MIT Media Lab’s acoustic engineer, Joseph Pompeii.  Describes a similar
technique under commercial and military development (American Techno-
logies Corp., San Diego) under the trade name “Hypersonic Sound”.
Shows that sound can be focussed to the extent of targetting just one
person in a crowd, acoustically, using ultrasound.

Up to Contents

VII.  THROUGH-WALL RADAR

When “millimeter wave” microwave signals are received, the waves are so
small that they can display a two-dimensional outline of an object.  Lower
frequency radar can only show a “blip” which indicates an object’s presence
or motion, but not it’s outline.

Incoming millimeter wave signals are channeled on to a plate with a two-
dimensional array of elements sensitive to millimeter wave frequencies, in
exactly the same way a camcorder focusses light on to array of sensitive
light pickups.  Each of the sensitive elements is scanned in a definite
order, just as with a TV camera and screen, and a picture showing the
outline of an object is formed.

If no signal is sent out by the scanner, it is called “passive” millimeter
wave radar.  If the subject is illuminated by a separate source of
millimeter wave signals, it is an “active” scanner.  Since passive systems
can penetrate clothing and non-conductive walls UNDETECTABLY, it is obvious
that with just a small millimeter wave “flashlight”, non-conductive walls
can be scanned through and still very little detectable signal is present.

Millimeter wave through-clothing, through-luggage is currently in use
at airports, but can be a powerful tool for stalking gangs wishing to
harass a target at home.

The subject is portrayed in the nude.

Appended articles:

TWR1

http://www.raven1.net/lads.htm, LADS, Life Assessment Detector
System, a product of VSE Corporation, can scan through more than
a hundred feet of non-conductive or poorly-conductive material to
detect a beating human heart

TWR2

http://www.raven1.net/nij_p44.htm, Prototype version of the
“radar flashlight”, which is a more portable version of the LADS
system above.  Can also be used to illuminate a subject for use
with a Millivision thru-clothing/thru-nonconductive wall scanner

TWR3

http://www.raven1.net/millitec.htm, October 1995 blurb from
Popular Mechanics, with photos showing hidden guns used for demo
purposes (Millitech sold the rights to Millivision)

TWR4

http://www.raven1.net/psradar.htm, March 22 text taken from
Patriot Scientific Corporation’s web site, their ground-penetrating
radar section.  Patriot’s GPR overcomes the limitation of the
Millivision passive radar, i.e. inability to penetrate partially
conductive walls.

Up to Contents 

VIII. THOUGHT READING

“Thought reading”, at least of words “silently said-to-self”, appears to
be not that difficult to do.  NASA is experimenting with sensitive
pickup coils on the throat of a pilot, for example.

Thought reading by way of pickup wires or coils on the head is an enhanced
version of computer speech recognition, with EEG waves being substituted
for sound waves.

The easiest “thought” reading is actually remote picking up of the electro-
magnetic activity of the speech-control muscles in the vocal cords.

When we “say words to ourselves, silently”, or, read a book, we can actually
FEEL the slight sensations of those words in our vocal muscles – all that is
absent is the passage of air.  Coordinated speech signals are relatively
strong and relatively consistent.

The other kind of “thought reading”, i.e. “MINING” someone’s brain for
information from a distance is SPECULATIVE.  We targeted individuals have
no way to verify that is happening, however, we do know that we are “fed”
hypnotic signals to force consistent “neutral” content (but of different
character than prior to becoming test subjects,) DREAMS.

These forced, neutral content (“bland” content) dreams occur every single
night and may represent the harassers’ (or experimenters’) efforts to have
our experiences portray themselves in such dreams, in effect, MINING our
experiences.  Again, this is SPECULATION, but it seems very logical.

Appendix TR4, referenced below, confirms the ability of current unclassified
technology to actually see what a living animal sees, electronically.  It is
therefore extremely likely that these forced dreams can be displayed on the
experimenters’ screens.

Finally, among the “couple of thousand” known gang stalking and electronic
harassment, we sometimes have strangers either tell us what we are thinking,
say they can pick up our broadcast thoughts, or tell us about events inside
our homes at times when they could not have seen from the outside.  BUGS
and covert cameras are not used, and they have been searched for.

Appended articles:

TR1

http://www.raven1.net/thotuncl.htm, Commercially available
thought-reading devices, both implant-style and non-implant

TR2

http://www.raven1.net/ratrobot.htm, Implanted rats can control
devices with their thoughts

TR3

http://www.raven1.net/ebrain.htm, from the July 1973 issue of
Popular Electronics, a system to read EEG signals (the stuff of which
thought reading is made) at a distance by passing a radio signal through
the human head and analyzing the passed-through signal.  THIS IS NOT
PROVEN TECHNOLOGY but it is one experimenter’s suggestion.

TR4

http://www.raven1.net/elecvisn.htm, an article describing
electronically reading a cat’s brain waves and constructing a real-time
image on screen from the EEG traces

TR5

http://www.raven1.net/m_switch.htm, the text from a site describing
a mind-controlled “switch”, which can not only turn appliances on or off,
but also adjust controls like volume.

Up to Contents 

IX.   IMPLANTS

Electronic implants are actually one of the older forms of electronic mind
control technology.  Implants can either receive instructions via radio
signals, passing them to the brain, or, can be interrogated via external
radio signals to read brain activity at a distance.

Implants are currently used, however, many of our group have had no
surgery, unexplained wounds, or missing time since becoming targets, and
we suspect that both implant and non-implant technology may be in use.
Implants are significant for these reasons:

1.  Their use, since World War II and continuing to the present day,
associated with MKULTRA atrocities, is a crystal clear indication
that a MOTIVE POOL of unethical researchers has existed through
the late 1970s.  The same people, none jailed, are still working,
by and large.  The reader can see that the existence of the same
motive pool is overwhelmingly likely, given that no social changes
have occurred which would prevent that.

2.  The fact that to date (autumn 1999) no victim who has had implants
removed has ever been able to get custody of the removed implant
shows that research programmes using implants are still quite active
and obviously quite important to someone.  Implants, even though
not in the hands of the victim, were photographed and are quite
real:

See http://www.ritualabuse.net/MCF/,
the Mind Control Forum for details on involuntary experimentees’
implantation and removal experiences.

3.  The use of implants shows that, in the field of involuntary human
experimentation, not every perpetrator group has access to the
most sophisticated (implant-less) technology.  Since implants for
beneficial purposes are actively being promoted by NIH, it is
obvious they will not disappear any time soon.

Appended articles:

IMP1

http://www.raven1.net/centneur.htm, an article showing that
human implantation is being done and even encouraged by the U.S.
NIH (National Institutes of Health).  While this public information
is for the public good, it is a small step to move from publicly
known and VOLUNTARY implantation to CONCEALED implantation for
INvoluntary and criminal purposes.

IMP2

 http://www.raven1.net/italydoc.htm, a testimonial by an
Italian psychiatrist who has been assisting involuntary experimentees;
this doctor began by assisting [Satanic or other] ritual abuse victims.
Apparently involuntary brain implantation is alive and well in Italy,
why not elsewhere?

IMP3

 http://www.raven1.net/telectro.htm, a project abstract by
AF, awarded to perform unclassified research and development of human
implants which can read both physio- and PSYCHO- parameters.

IMP4

 http://www.raven1.net/stimocvr.htm, an excerpt describing
human implantation for purposes of two-way communication with the brain
by way of implants and FM VHF radio.  Blows away any doubts that human
implantation has not been done, and even more, that the U.S. military
are involved.

IMP5

 http://www.raven1.net/sattrack.htm, describes an unclassified
human implant satellite tracking system, ostensibly for benevolent use.
(No method for avoiding unethical uses is described.)  Applied Digital
Solutions, Inc., Palm Beach, Florida.

Up to Contents

X.    CONCLUSION

Conclusion?  While the documentary evidence in this report, attached as
appendices below, does not exactly “prove” we are being targeted by
intelligence/defense contractors using classified electronic weapons, it
certainly eliminates the argument that such devices are impossible, don’t
exist, or that government has “no interest” in them, or that the “were
tried years ago but didn’t work”.

Add in the experiences of victims of the Tuskegee untreated syphilis exper-
iments, the feeding of radioactive food to uninformed U.S. citizens, and
the atrocities perpetrated under the institutional/drug/child abuse phases
of the CIA’s MKULTRA programmes, and you have more than enough grounds to
petition for an independent, open investigation of electronic harassment
capable technologies.

No doubt there were citizens of ancient Pompeii who argued that Vesuvius
could not possibly erupt in their lifetimes.

Eleanor White

If any doubts as to the importance of this issue remain, please see below
what the U.S. NSA (National Security Agency) says would be the result of
releasing information on electronic mind control, which is one motive
for developing weapons which can be used for electronic harassment:

Up to Contents 

XI.    APPENDICES

UP TO THIS PAGE, THIS REPORT HAS BEEN A NARRATIVE AUTHORED BY ELEANOR WHITE.  THE APPENDICES ARE A COLLECTION OF THE BEST QUALITY FACTUAL MATERIAL FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES OUTSIDE THE GANG STALKING AND ELECTRONIC HARASSMENT GROUP. 

THIS MATERIAL MAY BE INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED FROM REFERENCES PROVIDED.

Up to Contents

APPENDIX  PM1 … THE LIDA MACHINE

Associated Press (Exact date not shown on copy but tests took place 1982/83) Loma Linda (Veterans Hospital research unit)
San Bernardino County

An old medical, Russian-made device that transmits pulses
of 40 MHz radio signal at pulse rates designed to match
relaxed and sleeping states originally.

The machine, known as the LIDA, is on loan to the Jerry L.
Pettis Memorial Veterans Hospital through a medical exchange
program between the Soviet Union and the United States.

Hospital researchers have found in changes behavior in
animals.

“It looks as though instead of taking a valium when you want
to relax yourself it would be possible to achieve a similar
result, probably in a safer way, by the use of a radio field
that will relax you” said Dr. Ross Adey, chief of research
at the hospital.  [Dr. Adey is now deceased.]

[Missing one line on the photocopy] … manual shows it
being used on a human in a clinical setting, Adey said.
The manual says it is a “distant pulse treating apparatus”
for psychological problems, including sleeplessness, hyper-
tension and neurotic disturbances.

The device has not been approved for use with humans in this
country, although the Russians have done so since at least
1960, Adey Said.

Low frequency radio waves simulate the brain’s own electromagnetic
current and produce a trance-like state.

Adey said he put a cat in a box and turned on the LIDA.

“Within a matter of two or three minutes it is sitting there
very quietly … it stays almost as though it were transfixed”
he said.

Tho hospital’s experiment with the machine has been underway
for three months and should be completed within a year,
Adey said.

Eleanor White’s comments (Dr. Byrd’s statement follows):

1.  Heavy “fatigue attacks” are a very common experience among
involuntary neuro-electromagnetic experimentees.  The LIDA device
could, right out of the box, be used as a fatigue attack weapon,
FROM HIDING, thru non- or semi-conductive walls.

2.  If the LIDA machine is tuned for tranquilizing effect, then
it might also be tuned for “force awake” and other effects too.
This device is an electronic harassment weapon, AS IS.  A TV
documentary stated the Russian medical establishment considers
this 1950s device obsolete.  (Wonder what has taken it’s place?)

Below is a statement from Dr. Eldon Byrd, U.S. psychotronic
researcher who funded Dr. Adey’s work with the LIDA machine:

“The LIDA machine was made in the 1950’s by the Soviets.  The CIA
purchased one through a Canadian front for Dr. Ross Adey, but
didn’t give him any funds to evaluate it.

“I provided those funds from my project in 1981, and he determined
that the LIDA would put rabbits into a stupor at a distance and
make cats go into REM.

“The Soviets included a picture with the device that showed an
entire auditorium full of people asleep with the LIDA on the
podium.  The LIDA put out an electric field, a magnetic field,
light, heat, and sound (of course light and heat are
electromagnetic waves, but at a much higher frequency than the low
frequencies of the electric and magnetic fields mentioned above).

“The purported purpose of the LIDA was for medical treatments;
however, the North Koreans used it as a brain washing device
during the Korean War.  The big question is:  what did they do
with the technology?  It could have been improved and/or made
smaller.  It is unlikely that they abandoned something that
worked.

“Direct communication with Ross Adey:  While he was testing the
LIDA 4, an electrician was walking by and asked him where he got
the “North Korean brain washing machine”.  Ross told him that is
was a Russian medical device.

“The guy said he had been brain-washed by a device like that when
he was in a POW camp. They placed the vertical plates alongside
his head and read questions and answers to him.  He said he felt
like he was in a dream.  Later when the Red Cross came and asked
questions, he responded with what had been read to him while under
the influence of the device.  He said he seemed to have no control
over the answers.

“The LIDA is PATENTED IN THE US.  Why?  They are not sold in the
US–the only one I know that exists is the one that was at Loma
Linda Medical Center where Adey used to work.  Eldon”

Involuntary neuro-experimentation activist Cheryl Welsh, Davis CA,
sent in this clipping from an article by Dr. Ross Adey but without
complete bibliographic references:

“Soviet investigators have also developed a therapeutic device
utilizing low frequency square wave modulation of a radiofrequency
field.  This instrument known as the Lida was developed by L.
Rabichev and his colleagues in Soviet Armenia, and is designed  for
“the treatment of neuropsychic and somatic disorders, such as
neuroses, psychoses, insomnia, hypertension, stammering, bronchia
asthma, and asthenic and reactive disturbances”.

It is covered by U.S. Patent # 3,773,049.  In addition to the
pulsed RF field, the device also delivers pulsed light, pulsed
sound, and pulsed heat.  Each stimulus train can be independently
adjusted in intensity and frequency.

The radiofrequency field has a nominal carrier frequency of 40 MHz
and a maximum output of approximately 40 Watts.  The E- field is
applied to the patient on the sides of the neck through two disc
electrodes approximately 10 cm in diameter.  The electrodes are
located at a distance of 2-4 cm from the skin.

[Eleanor White’s comment:  The fact that Dr. Ross Adey mentioned
an “audience” being put to sleep by the LIDA suggests that the
“E-field” electrodes may not play an essential role.  The radio
signal appears to be the primary cause of the sleep/trance effect.]

Optimal repetition frequencies are said to lie in the range from 40
to 80 pulses per minute.  Pulse duration is typically 0.2 sec.  In
an 8 year trial period, the instrument was tested on 740 patients,
including adults and children.  Postivive therapeutic effects were
claimed in more…”

Up to Contents

APPENDIX PM2 – FREY’S PAPER

Human Auditory System Response To Modulated Electromagnetic Energy

ALLAN H. FREY

General Electric Advanced Electronics Center Cornell University Ithaca, New York

TRANSCRIPTION, Courtesy of MindNet Archives, Mike Coyle
posted at http://www.ritualabuse.net/MCF/

Frey, Allan H., Human Auditory system response to modulated
electromagnetic energy. J. Appl. Physiol. 17(4): 689-692.  1962.

(*) Asterisks indicate unreadable characters in the original copy.

NOTE:  In 1962, frequencies were expressed as kiloCYCLES,
megaCYCLES, etc., with abbreviations being kc, mc

–The intent of this paper is to bring a new phenomena to the
attention of physiologists.  Using extremely low average power
densities of electromagnetic energy, the perception of sounds was
induced in normal and deaf humans.  The effect was induced several
hundred feet from the antenna the instant the transmitter was turned
on, and is a function of carrier frequency and modulation. Attempts
were made to match the sounds induced by electromagnetic energy and
acoustic energy.

The closest match occurred when the acoustic amplifier was driven by
the rf transmitter’s modulator. Peak power density is a critical
factor and, with acoustic noise of approximately 80 db, a peak power
density of approximately 275 mw / rf is needed to induce the
perception at carrier frequencies 125 mc and 1,310 mc.  The average
power density can be at rf as low as 400 _u_w/cm2.  The evidence for
the various positive sites of the electromagnetic energy sensor are
discussed and locations peripheral to the cochlea are ruled out.

Received for publication 29 September 1961.

A significant amount of research has been conducted with the effects
of radio-frequency (rf) energy on organisms (electro- magnetic energy
between 1 kc and ** Gc). Typically, this work has been concerned with
determining damage resulting from body temperature increase.  The
average power densities used have been on the order of 0.1-t w/cm2
used over many minutes to several hours.

In contrast, using average power densities measured in microwatts per
square centimeter, we have found that ****r effects which are
transient, can be induced with rf energy.  Further, these effects
occur the instant the transmitter is turned on.  With appropriate
modulation, the perception of different sounds can be induced in
physically deaf, as well as normal, in human subjects at a distance
of inches up to thousands of feet from the transmitter.  With
somewhat different transmission parameters, you can induce the
perception of severe buffeting of the head, without such apparent
vestibular symptoms as dizziness or nausea.  Changing transmitter
parameters down, one can induce a “pins-and-needles” sensation.

Experimental work with these phenomena may yield information on
auditory system functioning and, more generally, in the nervous
system function.  For example, this energy could possibly be used as
a tool to explore nervous system coding, possibly using Neider and
Neff’s procedures (1), and for stimulating the nervous system without
the damage caused by electrodes.

Since most of our data have been obtained of the “rf sound” and only
the visual system has previously been shown to respond to
electromagnetic energy, this paper will be concerned only with the
auditory effects data.  As a further restriction, only data from
human subjects will be reported, since only this data can be
discussed meaningfully at the present time.  The long series of
studies we performed to ascertain that we were dealing with a
biological significant phenomena (rather than broadcasts from sources
such as loose fillings in the teeth) are summarized in another paper
(2), which also reports on the measuring instruments used in this
work.

The intent of this paper is to bring this new phenomenon to the
attention of physiologists.  The data reported are intended to
suggest numerous lines of experimentation and indicate necessary
experimental controls.

Since we are dealing with a significant phenomenon, we decided to
explore the effects of a wide range of transmitter parameters to
build up the body of knowledge which would allow us to generate
hypotheses and determine what experimental controls would be
necessary.  Thus, the numbers given are conservative; they should not
be considered precise, since the transmitters were never located in
ideal laboratory environments.  Within the limits of our
measurements, the orientation of the subject in the rf field was of
little consequence.

Most of the transmitters used to date in the experimentation have
been pulse modulated with no information placed on the signal.  The
rf sound has been described as being a buzz, clicking, hiss, or
knocking, depending on several transmitter parameters, i.e., pulse
width and pulse-repetition rate (PRF).  The apparent source of these
sounds is localized by the subjects as being within, or immediately
behind the head.  The sound always seems to come from within or
immediately behind the head no matter how the subjects twists or
rotates in the rf field.

Our early experimentation, preformed using transmitters with very
short square pulses and high pulse-repetition rates, seemed to
indicate that we were dealing with harmonics of the PRF.  However,
our later work has indicated that this is not the case; rather, the
rf sound appears to be incidental modulation envelope on each pulse,
as shown in Fig 1.

Some difficulty was experienced when the subjects tried to match the
rf sound to ordinary audio.  They reported that it was not possible
to satisfactorily match the rf sound to a sine wave or to white
noise.  An audio amplifier was connected to a variable bypass filter
and pulsed by the transmitter pulsing mechanism.  The subjects, when
allowed to control the filter, reported a fairly satisfactory match.
The subjects were fairly well satisfied with all frequencies below
5-kc audio were eliminated and the high- frequency audio was extended
as much as possible.  There was, however, always a demand for more
high-frequency components.  Since our tweeter has a rather good
high-frequency response, it is possible that we have shown an
analogue of visual phenomenon in which people see farther into the
ultraviolet range when the lenses is eliminated from the eye.  In
other words, this may be a demonstration that the mechanical
transmission system of the ossicles cannot respond to as high a
frequency as the rest of the auditory system.  Since the rf bypasses
the ossicle system and the audio given the subject for matching does
not, this may explain the dissatisfaction of our subjects in the
matching.

FIG. 1. Oscilloscope representation of transmitter output over
time (pulse-modulated).

TRANSMITTER ELECTRONIC NOISE
|–(INCIDENTAL MODULATION)
|
\/
:.:.:.:             :.:.:.:
|     |             |     |
|     |             |     |
|     |             |     |
—     —————     ———–
ON     OFF          ON     OFF

FIG. 2. Audiogram of deaf subject (otosclerosis) who had a “normal”
rf sound threshold.

-10|—-|—-|—-|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|
|    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
0|—-|—-|—-|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|–| A = RIGHT BONE
|    |    A    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|—-|—-B—-A–|–|–|–|–|–|–|–| B = LEFT BONE
|    |    |  B |  A  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
LOSS(db) 20|—-|—-|—-B–B–AB-B–B–B–AB-|–| C = LEFT AIR
|    |    |    |  |  |  |  A  |  |  |  |
|—-|—-|—-|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|–| D = RIGHT AIR
|    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  C
40|—-|—-|—-|–|–|–|–|–|–|–C–|
|    |    C C  C  |  |  |  |  |  C  |  |
|—-C—-|—-D–|–C–C–C–|–D–D–D
|    |    D    |  D  |  |  D  |  |  |  |
60|—-D—-|—-|–|–D–|–|–|–|–|–|
|    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|—-|—-|—-|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|
|    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
80|—-|—-|—-|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|
|    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|—-|—-|—-|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|
|    |    |    |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
100|—-|—-|—-|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|–|
125  250  500   1000  2000  4000  8000
FREQUENCY (cps)

TABLE 1. Transmitter parameters

Trans-   Frequency,    Wave-     Pulse Width,  Pulses Sec.   Duty Cy.
mitter      mc       length, cm    _u_sec

A       1,310        22.9           6           244         .0015
B       2,982        10.4           1           400         .0004
C         425        70.6         125            27         .0038
D         425        70.6         250            27         .007
E         425        70.6         500            27         .014
F         425        70.6        1000            27         .028
G         425        70.6        2000            27         .056
H       8,900         3.4           2.5         400         .001

FIG. 3. Attenuation of ambient sound with Flent antinoise stopples
(collated from Zwislocki (3) and Von Gierke (4).

|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|–|-|||
|    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||
|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|–|-||| A = FLENTS
|    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||
10|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|–|-||| B = THEORETICAL LIMIT
|    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||     OF ATTENUATION BY
FUNCTION(db) |—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|–|-|||     EAR PROTECTORS
A    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||
|—-A—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|–|-|||
B    |   A  A  A | A AAA   A|   |  | |||
|—-B—B–|–|-A-|-|||—-A—|–|-|||
|    |   |  |  B | | |||    | A |  | |||
30|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-B||—-|—A–|-A||
|    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  A |A|
|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||B—|—|–|-||A
|    |   |  |  | | | |||  B |   |  | |||
|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|–|-||B
|    |   |  |  | | | |||    B   |  | B||
|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|-B|-|||
|    |   |  |  | | | |||    | B |  | |||
50|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|–|-|||
|    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||
|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|–|-|||
|    |   |  |  | | | |||    |   |  | |||
|—-|—|–|–|-|-|-|||—-|—|–|-|||
100                    1000           10000
FREQUENCY

TABLE 2. Theshold for perception of rf sound (ambient noise level 70-
90 db).
Peak
Avg        Peak     Peak    Magnetic
Power      Power   Electric   Field
Trans-   Frequency,  Duty Cy.  Density,   Density   Field      amp.
mitter      mc                 mw, cm2    mw, cm2   v cm     turns, m

A       1,310      .0015      0.4         267      14         4
B       2,982      .0004      2.1       5,250      63        17
C         425      .0038      1.0         263      15         4
D         425      .007       1.9         271      14         4
E         425      .014       3.2         229      13         3
F         425      .028       7.1         254      14         4

FIG. 4. Threshold energy as a function of frequency of electromagnetic
energy (ambient noise level 70-90 db).

10000|———|————-|————–|
|———|————-|————–|
PEAK       |———|————-|————–|
POWER      |———|————-|————-*|
DENSITY    |———|————-|————*-|
(mw/cm2)   |         |             |          *   |
|———|————-|———*—-|
|         |             |       *      |
|———|————-|——*——-|
|         |             |    *         |
|         |             |   *          |
|         |             | *            |
1000|———|————-*————–|
|———|———–*-|————–|
|———|———*—|————–|
|         |       *     |              |
|———|—–*——-|————–|
| * * * * * * *         |              |
|———|————-|————–|
|         |             |              |
|         |             |              |
|         |             |              |
100|———|————-|————–|
200       1000          2000           3000
FREQUENCY (mc)

FIG. 5. Microwave power distribution in a forehead model neglecting
resonance effects and considering only first reflections
(from Nieset et al. (5), modified).

|    REFLECTED                    ABSORBED
1.5|— FREQUENCIES                  FREQUENCIES
|                   * *
|                  *    *         * = 10% OF INCIDENT
CENTIMETERS |Cortical         *                       POWER
|Tissue                    *
|                *                @ = 20% OF INCIDENT
1.0|—                         *            POWER
|                *
|                *              *
|Bone
|               *                 *
|
0.5|—           *      @  @   @       *
|Muscle     *    @               @
|Fat          @                     @    *
|Skin       @                          @ @
0|———–|———–|———–|———–|—
0          100        1000        10000       100000
FREQUENCY (mc)

FIG. 6. Area most sensitive to electromagnetic energy (shaded portion).

*   *  * * * *
*                    *
*                        *
* *       ::::::           *
*  *   :::::::::          *
*  O  *  ::::::::          *
*              * *           *
*               *          *
*               *         *
***         **          *
*        *             *
*  * * *             *
*              *
*               *
* * * * * * * * *                          

At one time in our experimentation with deaf subjects there seemed to
be a clear relationship between the ability to hear audio above 5 kc
and the ability to hear rf sounds.  If a subject could hear above 5
kc, either by bone or air conduction, then he could hear the rf
sounds.  For example, the threshold of the subject whose audio gram
appears in Fig. 2 was the same average power density as our normal
subjects.  Recently, however, we have found people with a notch
around 5 kc who do not perceive the rf sounds generated by at least
one of our transmitters.

THRESHOLDS

As shown in Table 1, we have used a fairly wide range of transmitter
parameters.  We are currently experimenting with transmitters that
radiate energy at frequencies below 425 mc, and are using different
types of modulation, e.g., pulse-repetition rates as low as 3 and
4/sec.

In the experimentation reported in this section, the ordinary noise
level was 70-90 db (measured with a General Radio Co. model 1551-B
sound level meter.)  In order to minimize the rf energy used in the
experimentation, subjects wore Flent antinoise ear stoppers whenever
measurements were made.  The ordinary noise attenuation of the Flents
is indicated in Fig. 3.  Although the rf sounds can be heard without
the use of Flents, eventhough they have an ambient noise evel of 90
db, it appears that the ambient noise to some extent “masked” the rf
sound.

Table 2 gives the thresholds for the perception of the sounds.  It
shows fairly clearly that the critical factor in the perception of
the rf sound is the peak power density, rather than the average power
density.  The relatively high value for transmitter B was expected
and will be discussed below.  Transmitter G has been omitted from the
table since the 20-mw/cm2 reading for it can be considered only
approximate.  The field-strength-measuring instruments used in that
experiment did not read high enough to give an accurate reading.  The
energy from transmitter H was not perceived, even when the peak power
density was as high as 25 w/cm2.

When the threshold energy is plotted as a function of the rf energy
(Fig. 4), a curve is obtained which is suggestive of the curve of
penetration of rf energy into the head.  Figure 5 shows the
calculated penetration, by frequency of rf energy, into the head. Our
data indicate that the calculated penetration curve may well be
accurate at the higher frequencies but the penetration at the lower
frequencies may be greater than that calculated on this model.

As previously noted, the thresholds were obtained in a high ambient
noise environment.  This is an unusual situation as compared to
obtaining thresholds of regular audio sound.  One recent
experimentation leads us to believe that, if the ambient noise level
were not so high, these threshold fields strengths would be much
lower. Since one purpose of this paper is to suggest experiments, it
might be appropriate to theories as to what the rf sound threshold
might be if we assumed that the subject is in an anechoic chamber.
It is also assumed that there is no transducer noise.

Given: As a threshold for the rf sound, a peak power density of 275
mw/cm2 determined in an ambient noise environment of 80 db. Earplugs
attenuate the ambient noise 30 db.

If: 1 mw/cm2 is set equal to o db, then 275 mw/cm2 is equal to 24 db.

Then: We can reduce the rf energy 50 db to -26 db as we reduce the
noise level energy from 50 db to o db.  We found that -26 db rf
energy is approximately 3 _u_w/cm2.

Thus:  If an anechoic room, rf sound could theoretically be induced
by a peak power density of 3 _u_w/cm2 measured in free space.  Since
only 10% of this energy is likely to penetrate the skull, the human
auditory system and a table radio may be one order of magnitude apart
in sensitivity to rf energy.

Up to Contents

RF DETECTOR IN AUDITORY SYSTEM

One possibility that seems to have been ruled out in our
experimentation is that of a capacitor-type effect with the tympanic
membrane and oval window acting as plates of a capacitor. It would
seem possible that these membranes, acting as plates of a capacitor,
could be set in motion by rf energy.  There are, however, three
points of evidence against this possibility.  First, when one rotates
a capacitor in an rf field, a rather marked change occurs in the
capacitor as a function of its orientation in the field.  When our
subjects rotate or change the positions of their heads in the field,
the loudness of the rf sound does not change appreciably.  Second,
the distance between these membranes is rather small, compared with
the wavelengths used.  As a third point, we found that one of our
subjects who has otosclerosis heard the rf sound.

Another possible location for the detecting mechanism is in the
cochlea.  We have explored this possibility with nerve-deaf people,
but the results are inconclusive due to factors such as tinnitus. We
are currently exploring this possibility with animal preparations.

The third likely place for the detection mechanism is the brain. Burr
and Mauro (6) presented evidence that indicates that there is an
electrostatic field about neurons.  Morrow and Sepiel (7) presented
evidence that indicates the existence of a magnetic field about
neurons.  Becker (personal communication) has done some work
indicating that there is longitudinal flow of charged carriers in
neurons.  Thus, it is reasonable to suspect that possibly the
electromagnetic field could interact with neuron fields.  As yet,
evidence of this possibility is inconclusive.  The strongest point
against it is that we have not found visual effects although we have
searched for them.  On the other hand, we have obtained other
nonauditory effects and have found that the sensitive area for
detecting rf sounds is a region over the temporal lobe of the brain.
One can shield, with a 2-in.2 piece of fly screen, a portion of the
stippled area shown in Fig. 6 and completely cut off the rf sound.

Another possibility should also be considered.  There is no good
reason to assume that there is only one detector site.  On the
contrary, the work of Jones et al. (8), in which they placed
electrodes in the ear and electrically stimulated the subject, is
sufficiently relevant to suggest the possibility of more than one
detector site. Also, several sensations have been elicited with
properly modulated electromagnetic energy.  It is doubtful that all
of these can be attributed to one detector.

As mentioned earlier, the purpose of this paper is to focus the
attention of physiologists on an unusual area and stimulate
additional work on which interpretations can be based.
Interpretations have been deliberately omitted from this paper since
additional data are needed before a clear picture can emerge. It is
hoped that the additional exploration will also result in an increase
in our knowledge of nervous system functions.

REFERENCES:

Neider, P.C. and W.D. Neff. Science 133: 1010, 1961.
Frey, A.H.  Aero Space Med. 32: 1140, 1961.
Zwislocki, J. Noise Control 4:42, 1958.
Von Gierke, H. Noise Control 2:37, 1956.
Nifset, R., Pinneo R. Baus J. Fleming, & R. McAfee.  Ann. Rept. USAF
Rome Air Development Command, TR-61-65, 1961.
Burr, H., & J.  Seipel, J. Wash Acad. Sci. 21: 455, 1949.
Morrow, R., & J.  Seipel. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 30: 1, 1969.
Jones, R.C., S.S.  Stevens, & M.H. Laurie. J. Acoust. Sci. Am. 12: 281, 1940.

Up to Contents

APPENDIX PM3 – NASA ARTICLE

TITLE: Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood flow of
conscious rats

Original web link, folded for readability
http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ntrs/hget.cgi?recon?2044/3=/raid5/index/star/80%2517043725%202044%20N19810004209recon1

Eleanor White’s inserted note:

See the ITALIC text below.  This abstract has implications
FAR beyond “rats”

Document ID:   19810004209  N (81N12720) File Series: NASA Technical Reports
Report Number: AD-A090426
Sales Agency & Price: CASI Hardcopy or Microfiche

Authors:
Oscar, K. J. (Army Mobility Equipment Command)

Published: Jun 01, 1980

Corporate Source:
Army Mobility Equipment Command (Fort Belvoir, VA, United States)
Pages: 10
Contract Number: None

NASA Subject Category: LIFE SCIENCES (GENERAL)

Abstract:

A decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to
remotely create the perception of noise in the heads of personnel by
exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves. When people are
illuminated with properly modulated low power microwaves the
sensation is reported as a buzzing, clicking, or hissing which seems
to originate (regardless of the person’s position in the field)
within or just behind the head. The phenomena occurs at average power
densities as low as microwatts per square centimeter with carrier
frequencies from 0.4 to 3.0 GHz. By proper choice of pulse
characteristics, intelligible speech may be created. Before this
technique may be extended and used for military applications, an
understanding of the basic principles must be developed. Such an
understanding is not only required to optimize the use of the concept
for camouflage, decoy and deception operations but is required to
properly assess safety factors of such microwave exposure.

Major Subject Terms:

AUDITORY PERCEPTION
BRAIN CIRCULATION
DECEPTION
MICROWAVES
PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
RADIATION EFFECTS

Minor Subject Terms:

BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
HEMODYNAMICS
MILITARY TECHNOLOGY
RADIATION DOSAGE
SOUND LOCALIZATION

Language Note: English

NASA Access Help Desk

E-mail:  help@sti.nasa.gov
Phone:   301-621-0390
FAX: 301-621-0134

Eleanor White’s comments:  I have received this report in it’s
entirety and I find that the article itself is about the title:
Cerebral blood flow in rats.  We involuntary experimentees are
extremely lucky that the authors mentioned the success of microwave
voice to skull transmission in this official document.

Below I have extracted some of the references to the full document
which appear to be more promising and specific.  This sub-list is
guesswork since the references omit article titles, but any articles
by Frey or Justesen are potentially useful.

1.  Frey, A.H., Messenger, R. and Eichert, E.,
National Technical Information Service,
Doc. No. AD747684 (1972)

5.  Justesen, D.R., IEEE Spectrum 16, 67-68 (1979)

7.  Frey, A.H., Feld, S.R., & Frey, B. Annals of
N.Y. Academy of Science, 247, 433-439 (1975)

18. Frey, A.H., & Messenger, R., Science  181,
356-358 (1973)

25. Frey, A.H., & Feld, S.R., Journal of Comp.
Physiology and Psychology,  89, 183-188
(1975)

27. King, N.W., Justesen, D.R., & Clarke, R.L.,
Science  172, 398-401 (1977)

Up to Contents

APPENDIX PM4 – SEA/KOHN’S PROJECTS

Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect

Web address:
http://es.epa.gov/ncerqa_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.html
Awarding Agency:  Department of Defense
SBIR Contract Number: F41624-95-C-9007
Title: Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect
Principal Investigator: Mr. Brian Kohn

Company Name:
Science & Engineering Assoc, Inc.
6100 Uptown Blvd NE
Albuquerque, NM 87110
Telephone Number: 505-884-2300
Business Representative:
Project Period:
Project Amount: $739,995
Research Category: Monitoring/Analytical

Description:

An innovative and revolutionary technology is described that offers a
means of low-probability-of-intercept Radio frequency (RF)
communications.    The feasibility of the concept has been
established using both a low intensity laboratory system and a
high power RF transmitter.  Numerous military applications exist in
areas of search and rescue, security and special operations.

Supplemental Keywords: small business, SBIR,
See also: http://www.seabase.com
Last Updated:  November 17, 1997

BRIAN KOHN’S PROJECT, EARLIER STUDY:

Program: SBIR
Agency: AF  Field
Office: AL
TOPIC Number: AF93-026
Control Number: 93AL -185
Contract Number: F41624-93-C-9013
Phase: 1
Awarded In: 93
Award Amount: $37,806
Award Start Date: 17 MAY 93
Award Completion Date: 17 DEC 93
Proposal Title: Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect
Principal Investigator Name:Brian Kohn
Principal Investigator Phone:505-884-2300
Firm SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ASSOC., INC.
SEA Plaza
6100 Uptown Blvd NE
SUITE 700
Albuquerque, NM 87110
Woman Owned:  N
Minority Owned:  N
Number of Employees:  95

Keywords:
MICROWAVE HEARING RF HEARING
BONE CONDUCTION THERMOELASTIC
COCHLEAR MICROPHONICS

Abstract:

In this research program, we plan to investigate a revolutionary new
form of communication based on the microwave auditory effect. This
proposed communication idea satisfies the requirements for an
innovative, natural interface requiring no learning or training for
efficient operation and effective communications. The purpose of the
program proposed here is to extend the results of a recent
feasibility study, performed for the Armstrong Laboratory/OEDR. The
study found that voice communications, via the microwave auditory
effect, are highly feasible. In Phase I of this SBIR, we propose to
investigate the range of potential applications for this radically
different form of voice communication and recommend hardware and
systems concepts suitable for laboratory and brassboard
demonstrations to be built under Phase II.

Up to Contents

APPENDIX PM5 – BIOLOGICAL AMPLIFICATION

Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems
edited by Dr. James C. Lin, University of Illinois
1989 Plenum Press, New York

Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Interactions of
Electromagnetic Waves with Biological Systems, held as part
of the Twenty-Second General Assembly of the International
Union of Radio Science, Aug 25 – Sept 2, 1987, in Tel Aviv,
Israel.

ISBN 0-306-43109-2
QP82.2.N64E44 1989
612.01448-dc19 88-38957
CIP

Eleanor White’s comments on this posting:

This book focusses on NON-ionizing radiation, and contains
detailed texts about NON-THERMAL effects.  In other words,
“right up our alley”.

The main use of this book is to show that it is easy for
electromagnetic signals to cause radio frequency hearing and other
effects at LOW power levels.  This in turn can be used to explain why
DETECTION is so very difficult.

I don’t understand the biological jargon, however, a few of the more
plain-language paragraphs STUNNINGLY verify that with careful choice
of signal frequency and modulation, not only can the body’s cells
detect the modulation envelope of an incoming radio signal (i.e.
function as a “cellular crystal set”) but even AMPLIFY these
carefully formed signals.  (Amplification of other effects, such as
proneness to disease, is also covered in the book.)

“Detection”, in terms of radio signal reception, means that some
portion of the reciever “rectifies”, that is, turns the AC of the
incoming signal into varying DC.  If this conversion is not done,
voice to skull wouldn’t work.

The book touches also on ways in which cells communicate, and
shows that electromagnetic fields of relatively weak power levels
can affect intercellular communication, which is, as I understand
the subject, what the brain is “all about”.

Bio-amplification is apparently why radio signals of very low average
power (“MICROwatts” per NASA) can still produce audio effects,
and no doubt plays a part in difficulties in detection.

When two more characteristics of voice to skull are factored in:

1. The carrier signal can be “hopped” continuously within the
bioeffective bandwidth, known as “spread spectrum” transmission,
and,

2. The voice modulation most effective for undetectable hypnosis
is evidently a voice shifted just above normal hearing, but still
audible to the brain,

…you have a recipe for incredibly difficult signals to detect.

This book is a mainstream publication, very well suited to use
in our publicity and persuasion campaigns, and our dealings with
authorities who claim radio signals don’t affect living tissue
except to heat it.

Finally, many thanks to Blanche Chavoustie for providing me
photocopies of this book – a saintly work!

Page 110:
…
At that time [1953] excitatory mechanisms in nerver fibers
and nerve cells were grouped under a common rubric of ionic
equilibrium mechanisms.  There was little interest in the
possibility that functional organization of mebranes of cell
bodies might involve threshhold sensitivities to both
oscillating EM fields and to molecular stimuli at energy
levels substantially lower than predicted by Hodgkin-
Huxley models, and substantially below typical threshholds
in nerve fibers.

Much recent research cited below has shown that imposed weak
low frequency fields (and radiofrequency fields amplitude-
modulated at ELF frequencies) that are many orders of
magnitude weaker in the pericellular fluid [fluid between
adjacent cells] than the membrane potential gradient [voltage
across the membrane] can modulate actions of hormone, anti-
body neurotransmitter and cancer-promoter molecules at their
cell surface receptor sites.

From their electrical characteristics, these sensitivities
appear to involve nonequilibrium and highly cooperative
processes that mediate a major amplification of initial
weak triggers associated with binding of these molecules at
their specific cell surface receptor sites.

(Adey, 1983, 1986, 1987; Adey and Lawrence, 1984; Lawrence
and Adey, 1982).

Page 122:

Cooperative Modification of Calcium Binding by RF Fields
at Cell Surfaces with Amplification of Initial Signals

Initial stimuli associated with weak perpindicular EM fields
and with binding of stimulating molecules at their membrane
receptor sites elicit a HIGHLY COOPERATIVE modification of
Ca++ binding to glycoproteins along the membrane surface.

As noted above, a longitudinal spread is consistent with
the direction of extracellular current flow associated with
physiological activity and imposed EM fields.  This cooper-
ative modification of surface Ca++ binding is an
AMPLIFYING STAGE, with evidence from concurent initial molecular
binding events by imposed RF fields that there is a far greater
increase in Ca++ efflux than is accounted for in the events of
receptor-ligand binding (Bawin and Adey, 1976; Bawin et al,
1975; Liu-Liu and Adey, 1982).

Page 124:
…
Enzymes are protein molecules that function as catalysts,
initiating and enhancing chemical reactions that would not
otherwise occur at tissue temperatures.  This ability resides
in the pattern of electrical charges on the molecular surface.
In the fashion of more familiar chemical catalysts, such as
the hydrocarbon oxidation systems which function only at very
high temperatures in automotive exhaust systems, a catalyst
emerges unchanged from these reactions and is thus able to
participate indefinitely in a specific reaction.

Activation of these enzymes and the reactions in which they
participate involve energies millions of times greater than
in the cell surface cell surface triggering events initiated
by the EM fields, emphasizing the MEMBRANE AMPLIFICATION
inherent in this trans-membrane signaling sequence.

Page 131:
…
Stimulus Amplification in Cooperative Systems
…
It is therefore clear that OBSERVED EM field interactions
with cells and tissues based on oscillating ELF tissue gradients
between 10 E-7 and 10 E-1 volts per centimeter would involve
cooperativity MANY ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE GREATER than envisaged in
the examples just cited.

In part this discrepancy appears to relate to far greater
sensitivities to low-frequency EM fields [EW: ELF, that is, the
“entrainment” frequencies] and to RF fields with low-frequency
amplitude-modulation [EW: this includes radar hearing signals]
than to imposed step functions or DC gradients [EW: common
with contact electrodes, not of interest in mind control at a
distance] used in many electrochemical experiments and models
to test levels of cooperativity in biological systems.
(Blank, 1972)

[EW: In plain language, both entrainment (ELF) fields and
pulsating radar-like (RF) fields are a hell of a lot more
influential on cells than some experimental work using DC
and electrode methods.]

Page 95:

[EW: This section is not part of the demonstration that EM
signals can be biologically amplified, as above.  It’s main
interest is that a magnetophosphene “gun” was under consider-
ation by the U.S. National Institute of Justice in 1993, along
with a “fever” gun and a “convulsion” gun, both using micro-
wave technology.  As of 1999, nothing has been heard from NIJ
on this development, however, page 95 here suggests that such
a microwave weapon is feasible.]

Magnetophosphenes

An effect of time-varying magnetic fields on humans was first
described by d’Arsonval (1896) [EW: Anyone doubt there has
been some progress since 1896?] is the induction of a flicker-
ing illumination within the visual field field known as
magnetophosphenes.  This phenomenon occurs as an immediate
response to stimulation by either pulsed or sinusoidal magnetic
fields with frequencies less than 100 Hz, and the effect is
completely reversible with no apparent influence on visual
acuity.  The maximum visual sensitivity to sinusoidal magnetic
fields has been found at a frequency of 20 Hz in human subjects
with normal vision.

[EW: Radio signals are a combination of electric and magnetic
fields.  To radiate a 20 Hz signal would require such huge
antennas that it is impractical to do so.  I’d recommend that
if someone has the facilities and skills, I’d try some VHF (or
microwave) pulsing at 20 Hz on an RF carrier at, say, the 2-meter
(144-148 MHz) ham band with a duty cycle, say, of 20% pulse-ON
time.]

Up to Contents

APPENDIX PM6 – VOICE TO SKULL, 1974 SUCCESS

Microwaves and Behavior
Dr. Don R. Justesen
Laboratories of Experimental Neuropsychology
Veterans Administration Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri
as published in
American Psychologist
Journal of the American Psychological Association
Volume 30, March 1975, Number 3

……………. Eleanor’s comments …………………….
This LAYS TO REST ANY DOUBTS THAT VOICE TO SKULL
TECHNOLOGY DOES NOT EXIST OR IS “IN THE FUTURE”!
PERIOD!

This article describes in precise terms how Dr. Joseph C.
Sharp and staff transmitted the WORDS for the digits 1 to 10
using a modulated version of an Allan Frey type pulsed
microwave transmitter.  A detailed description of Frey
transmitters can be viewed at:

Appendix PM2

The relevant text is below.

Page 396:

…

The demonstration of sonic transduction of microwave energy
by materials lacking in water LESSENS the likelihood that a
thermohydraulic principle is operating in human perception
of the energy.  Nonetheless, some form of thermoacoustic
transduction probably underlies perception.  If so, it is
clear that simple heating is NOT a sufficient basis for the
Frey effect; the requirement for pulsing of radiations
appears to implicate a thermodynamic principle.

Frey and Messenger (1973) and Guy, Chou, Lin, and Christen-
sen (1975) confirmed that a microwave pulse with a slow rise
time is INeffective in producing an auditory response; only
if the rise time is SHORT, resulting in effect in a square
wave with respect to the leading edge of the envelope of
radiated radio-frequency energy, does the auditory response
occur.

[Eleanor’s comment:  This is why we don’t “hear” ordinary
radio and TV signals.]

Thus the rate of change (the first derivative) of the
waveform of the pulse is a CRITICAL factor in perception.
Given a thermodynamic interpretation, it would follow that
information can be encoded in the energy and “communicated”
to the “listener”.

Communication has in fact been demonstrated.  A. Guy (Note
1), a skilled telegrapher, arranged for his father, a retired
railroad telegrapher, to operate a key, each closure and
opening of which resulted in a pulse of microwave energy.
By directing the radiations at his own head, complex mess-
ages via the Continental Morse Code were readily received
by Guy.

Sharp and Grove (note 2) found that appropriate modu-
lation of microwave energy can result in “wireless” and
“receiverless” communication of SPEECH.  The recorded by
voice on tape each of the single-syllable words for digits
between 1 and 10.  The electrical sine-wave analogs of each
word were then processed so that each time a sine wave
crossed ZERO REFERENCE IN THE NEGATIVE DIRECTION, a brief
pulse of microwave energy was triggered.

[Eleanor’s comment:  This is, in effect a form of what is
called pulse-RATE modulation.]

By radiating themselves with these “voice modulated”
microwaves, Sharp and Grove were READILY able to hear,
identify, and distinguish among the 9 words.  [Typo?]
The sounds heard were not unlike those emitted by persons
with artificial larynxes.

Communication of more complex words and of sentences was
not attempted because the averaged densities of energy
required to transmit longer messages would approach the
current 10 milliwatts per square centimeter limit of safe
exposure.

The capability of communicating directly with a human being
by “receiverless radio” has obvious potentialities both
within and without the clinic.  But the hotly debated and
unresolved question of how much microwave radiation a human
being can safely be exposed to will probably forestall
applications within the near future.

Up to Contents

APPENDIX PM7 – U.S. GOVT DOCUMENT RE: RUSSIAN MIND CONTROL

A Warning to the World from Russian Psychotronic Researchers

Unclassified FOIA document, courtesy Cheryl Welsh, which is a bulletin
circulated among U.S. government agencies reviewing an October 6, 1995
Russian TV news segment titled “Man and Law” on the topic of mind
control technology.  The images below complement another video produced
by German ZDF TV and shown on December 22, 1998.  The 1998 video’s
transcribed sound track, in English is posted at:

http://www.raven1.net/russvid.htm

Here are the images of the FOIA document:

Up to Contents

APPENDIX PM8 – OAK RIDGE LABS AND OTHER BULLETINS

THE FOLLOWING SET OF ARTICLES HIGHLIGHTS OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABS’
RESEARCH INTO RADIO FREQUENCY WEAPONS.  I HAVE PHONED THEM AND THE
1993 NEWS RELEASE BELOW IS GENUINE.  E.W.

Date sent:        Fri, 10 May 1996 17:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
To:               MindNet@c2.org
From:             vericomm@c2.org
Subject:          MindNet Journal – Vol. 1, No. 73

V E R I C O M M / MindNet         “Quid veritas est?”

Sender: Owner-MindNet@c2.org

The views and opinions expressed below are not necessarily the
views and opinions of VERICOMM, MindNet, or the editors unless
otherwise noted.

Permission is given to reproduce and redistribute, for
non-commercial purposes only, provided this information and the
copy remain intact and unedited.

Editor: Mike Coyle

Assistant Editor: Rick Lawler

Research: Darrell Bross

PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPMENT OF
LESS-THAN-LETHAL WEAPONS

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Physiological Responses Applicable to Development of
Less-Than-Lethal Weapons

Sponsored by National Institute of Justice

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Less-than-lethal weapons have a variety of applications in law
enforcement, including rescuing hostages, stopping fleeing
felons, and quelling prison disturbances. The National Institute
of Justice is sponsoring a broad program to develop new
techniques for “friendly force” as an alternative to the use of
deadly force. As part of this program, Oak Ridge National
Laboratory (ORNL) is examining approaches based on known
physiological responses to certain types of stimuli. These
“weapons” would temporarily incapacitate an individual or a
group with no lasting physiological damage. These concepts are
based on ORNL’s experience and expertise in biological-based
systems and biophysical responses, particularly in evaluating
the physical responses of humans to a variety of chemical,
physical and radiological agents. ORNL also has extensive
experience and expertise in risk analysis and in risk assessment
and modeling.

The ORNL less than-lethal weapons project sponsored by the
National Institute of Justice began in September 1993. The
following tasks are being performed:

*   Locate and compile data from tests, accidents, medical
literature, etc. on biological and biophysical responses
to energetic stimuli (such as electromagnetic fields).
*   Analyze the information and identify promising candidate
mechanisms for further development for a friendly force
*   Evaluate the applicability of the proposed approaches to
several realistic scenarios (such as hostage rescue or riot
control).

ORNL has already examined several possible concepts for
less-than-lethal weapons based on known physiological responses
to energetic stimuli, including a thermal gun, a seizure gun,
and a magnetophosphene gun. A thermal gun would have the
operational effect of heating the body to 105 to 107F, thereby
incapacitating any threat, based on the fact that even a slight
fever can affect the ability of a person to perform even simple
tasks. This approach is built on four decades of research
relating radio frequency exposure to body heating. A seizure gun
would use electromagnetic energy to induce epileptic-like
seizures in persons within the range of a particular
electromagnetic field. The magnetophosphene gun is designed
around a biophysical mechanism which evokes a visual response
and is thought to be centered in the retina, known as
magnetophosphenes. This effect is experienced when a person
receives a blow to the head and sees “stars”. This same effect
can be produced with electromagnetic energy. While there are a
number of technical challenges to be overcome in building
devices of these types, less-than-lethal weapons based on
physiological responses to energetic stimuli would provide a
safe and effective means of dealing with a number of law
enforcement situations where use of deadly force is not
desirable.

For further information contact:

Ray Downs, National Institute of Justice (202) 616-3509 Susan
Sherrow, Oak Ridge Special Projects Office (615) 576-8024

Oak Ridge National Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy
Laboratory Managed by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.

MindNet Journal Archive Filename: [mn173.txt]
To receive the MindNet Journal via email:

Send message: [subscribe mindnet] to: .

To unsubscribe:

Send message: [unsubscribe mindnet] to: .

Back issues of the MindNet Journal are available at our=20
FTP Archive site:=20

[/pub/users/vericomm/mindnet/]

MindNet Journal Publication Index: [mnindex.txt]

Submission of articles for publication within the MindNet
Journal on the subjects of mind control, directed-energy
weapons, non-lethal weapons, ritual abuse, UFO abductions,
bioelectromagnetics, hypnosis, and other related topics
will be accepted with the author’s statement of permission
to publish. The editor reserves the right to accept or
reject for publication. The publisher disclaims all
responsibility to return unsolicited matter. Send articles
for submission to:

, or VERICOMM BBS 510.891.0303, or VERICOMM,
POB 32314, Oakland, CA 94604-2314 USA.

VERICOMM / MindNet and its agents disclaim any and all
responsibility or liability for any and all claims and/or
guarantees, express or implied, and delivery of products,
merchandise, and/or services offered for sale by
advertisers and/or authors within the MindNet Journal.

The MindNet mailing list is owned and maintained by Mike Coyle,
, VERICOMM / MindNet, POB 32314 Oakland, CA
94604-2314 USA.

The MindNet Journal is published by VERICOMM / MindNet in=20
cooperation with the Freedom Of Thought Foundation, POB 35072,
Tucson, AZ 85740-5072 USA.

Los Angeles Herald Examiner, Section A, November 22, 1976

Mind-Altering Microwaves:  Soviets Studying Invisible Ray

A newly declassified U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency report
says extensive Soviet research into microwaves might lead to
methods of causing disoriented human behavior, nerve disorders,
and even heart attacks.

…

A copy of the study was provided by the agency to the Associated
Press in response to a request under the Freedom of Information
Act.

…

Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating
intercranially (within the head) can be induced by signal
modulation at very low average power densities, the study said.

…

One physiological effect which has been demonstrated is heart
seizure, the report said.

It said this has been accomplished experimentally in frogs
by synchronizing the pulses of a microwave signal with the
animal’s heartbeat and beaming the radiation at the chest
area.

Microwave News, January-February 1987

ZAP!

Six hundred scientists and engineers with security clearances
spend the first week of December at Kirtland Air Force Base in
New Mexico examining the potential of high-power microwaves to
zap enemy electronics…

… Many branches of the Department of Defense were represented,
including the Air Force, the Army and the Navy, together with
DARPA, DIA, and DNA.  The Lawrence Livermore Labs were also
well represented, as were most of the big defense contractors –
General Dynamics, Physics International and TRW each have a
high-power microwave testing facility.

In addition to these sources, susceptibility and hardening,
there was one on biological effects:  Dr. David Erwin and
Major Robert Downs represented the Air Force and Howard Bassen
and Dr. John D’Andrea described the Army and Navy programs,
respectively.  Dr. Frank Barnes of the University of Colorado
in Boulder presented a poster paper on his and Dr. Howard
Wachtel’s research on the effects of pulsed microwaves.

Chuck de Caro, a former correspondent for the Cable News Network,
considers the possibility that the U.S. is falling behind the
U.S.S.R. in microwave weapons in “The Zap Gap”, to be published
in the March issue of “The Atlantic” (see also MWN November-
December 1986).

Microwave News, January-February 1996

RF WEAPONS – Disabling People and Electronics

The military continues to explore development of RF weapons
for the conflicts of the future.  For instance, the “First
Directed Energy Warfare (DEW) Conference”, held last year
at the Mitre Corp. in McLean VA, featured Dr. David Erwin
of the Armstrong Lab at Brooks AFB, San Antonio, TX, on
“Directed Energy Warfare RF Effects”, and D.r Jose Pina of
the CIA on “Ground Combat Applications of RF”.  Other topics
included “Personnel Vulnerability” and Directed Energy
Warfare Biological Effects”.

The June meeting was organized by the Association of Old
Crows, whose members are specialists in electronic warfare.
Conference participants had to have security clearances of
“Secret” or higher, as has been the case at similar meetings
in the past (See MWN, J-F 87 and N-D 93).

Public discussions of RF/MW weapons have focussed on dis-
rupting technology.  But a recent Article in the Airpower
Journal revealed “for the first time that the military is
developing high-powered microwave weapons for use against
human beings”, reports Peter Cassidy in the January 1996
“Progressive” (see p. 14).

RF/MW and EMF-based weapons are also being studied for
civilian law enforcement.  Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(ORNL) in Oak Ridge TN will soon complete a literature
review for the National Insitute of Justice on the
feasibility of “thermal guns” which could heat the body to
105 to 107 degrees F and incapacitate the target; “seizure
guns” which would use EM energy to induce epileptic-like
seizures; and “magnetophosphene guns” which would cause
the target to “see stars”.

The institute’s Ray Downs in Washington cautioned that the
report may not be made public.  ORNL’s Dr. Clay Easterly
has said that some effects not associated with heating
could be useful in developing nonlethal weapons.
(See MWN, N-D 93.)

Microwave News, September-October 1996, page 19

Stop That Car or We’ll Zap You

They’re the sexiest gadgets in this year’s action movies:
EMP weapons, which use electromagnetic pulses to zap
electronics.  They have starring roles in Goldeneye, the
latest James Bond movie, as well as in Broken Arrow, Escape
From LA, and Eraser.  And soon they may be coming to a
police car near you.

Law Enforcement News (September 30) reports that the U.S.
Army and the National Institute of Justice are running a
$500,000 field test to see if EMP guns can force a car to
stop by disabling its electrical systems.  The plan is to
use EMP to do away with high speed chases (another Hollywood
staple).  This is another example of the growing interest in
using nonlethal weapons developed by the military.

Up to Contents